Group Versus Individual Physiotherapy for Urinary Incontinence in Aging Women
GROUP
Group Physiotherapy Compared to Individual Physiotherapy to Treat Urinary Incontinence in Aging Women: A Randomized Control Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
362
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The recommended treatment for urinary incontinence (UI) in women is individualised pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training, a costly and resource-intense approach; one Canada is currently unable to meet. This non-inferiority randomized control trial seeks to determine if group-based PFM training is as effective as individualised PFM training for treating UI in women 65 and over, and to establish the cost-effectiveness of both. Demonstrating that group-based treatment is at least as good as individualised one-on-one treatment and more cost-effective would warrant including group-based PFM training as a first-line UI treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 12, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
ExpectedSeptember 8, 2025
September 1, 2025
5.9 years
December 12, 2013
September 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the number of UI episodes
evaluated with a 7-day bladder diary
at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment, and 8 years after recruitment for those who completed the 12-month evaluation
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome
at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment, and 8 years after recruitment for those who completed the 12-month evaluation.
Symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome
at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment, and 8 years after recruitment for those who completed the 12-month evaluation.
Symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome
at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment.
Symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome
at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment.
Symptoms and degree to which UI-associated symptoms are troubling or bothersome
at recruitment, 13 weeks after recruitment and 12 months after recruitment.
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group physiotherapy
EXPERIMENTAL12 weekly treatment visit + daily home exercise program
Individual one-on-one physiotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATOR12 weekly treatment visit + daily home exercise program
Interventions
Multimodal Group physiotherapy 12 weeks of weekly Group physiotherapy treatments including education and pelvic floor muscle exercises
Multimodal Individual physiotherapy 12 weeks of weekly Individual physiotherapy treatments including education and pelvic floor muscle exercises
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or older
- suffering from stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) symptoms
- at least 3 urinary incontinence episodes per week x 3 months or more
- ambulatory without the need of assisted device
- understand French or English instruction
- hormonal replacement stable for 6 months
You may not qualify if:
- present risk factors known to interfere with the effects of PFM training
- \>2 degree Pop-Q
- body mass index \>35
- chronic constipation
- have received physiotherapy or surgical treatment within the last year
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Laboratoire incontinence et vieillissement CRIUGM
Montreal, Quebec, H3W 1W5, Canada
Related Publications (5)
Cacciari LP, Kouakou CR, Poder TG, Vale L, Morin M, Mayrand MH, Tousignant M, Dumoulin C. Group-based pelvic floor muscle training is a more cost-effective approach to treat urinary incontinence in older women: economic analysis of a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2022 Jul;68(3):191-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
PMID: 35753969BACKGROUNDDumoulin C, Morin M, Danieli C, Cacciari L, Mayrand MH, Tousignant M, Abrahamowicz M; Urinary Incontinence and Aging Study Group. Group-Based vs Individual Pelvic Floor Muscle Training to Treat Urinary Incontinence in Older Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1284-1293. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2993.
PMID: 32744599BACKGROUNDDumoulin C, Morin M, Mayrand MH, Tousignant M, Abrahamowicz M. Group physiotherapy compared to individual physiotherapy to treat urinary incontinence in aging women: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Nov 16;18(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2261-4.
PMID: 29145873BACKGROUNDCacciari LP, Morin M, Mayrand MH, Dumoulin C. Incontinence in Older Women: When to Expect Meaningful Leakage Reduction from Pelvic Floor Muscle Training. Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Dec 17. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06486-3. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41405686DERIVEDHay-Smith EJC, Starzec-Proserpio M, Moller B, Aldabe D, Cacciari L, Pitangui ACR, Vesentini G, Woodley SJ, Dumoulin C, Frawley HC, Jorge CH, Morin M, Wallace SA, Weatherall M. Comparisons of approaches to pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD009508. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009508.pub2.
PMID: 39704322DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chantal Dumoulin, Ph.D.
Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr Chantal Dumoulin, researcher and laboratory director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 12, 2013
First Posted
January 20, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
September 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09