Effectiveness of Continence Promotion Interventions Among Community-dwelling Older Women
Self-management, Constructivism or Both as Knowledge Transfer Strategies for Reducing the Cost and Impact of Urinary Incontinence Among Community-dwelling Senior Women in the United Kingdom
1 other identifier
interventional
259
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Urinary incontinence is a common and bothersome condition that remains frequently untreated among senior women. The aim of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of two community-based continence promotion interventions aimed at improving rates of self-care and/or professional health-care seeking in older women with urinary incontinence. The main hypothesis posits that participation in a constructivist interactive workshop combined with use of an evidence-based self-management tool will yield rates of improvement in incontinence frequency and reduce the cost of pad use by 20% compared to either intervention alone, which individually are expected to yield minimal effect sizes of at least 0.3 compared to a sham intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 10, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 11, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2013
CompletedMay 15, 2013
May 1, 2013
2.3 years
November 10, 2010
May 14, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incontinence frequency
Reductions in incontinence frequency as indicated on a 72-hour voiding diary at 3-months post-intervention compared to baseline.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Cost of pad use
3 months
Self-efficacy for managing incontinence
3-months
Study Arms (4)
Self-management
EXPERIMENTALGeneral Health Lecture
SHAM COMPARATORCombined workshop and self-management
EXPERIMENTALWorkshop
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
A one hour interactive group workshop aimed at contradicting commonly held beliefs and maladaptive practices about incontinence. The interactive continence workshop was designed to create cognitive dissonance and challenge these beliefs and practices, as well as to promote more effective therapeutic strategies for correcting urine leakage.
Participants will receive a customized evidence-based risk factor modification self-management tool targeting up to 6 risk factors and associated therapeutic strategies. The six risk factors are pelvic floor muscle weakness, consumption of caffeinated drinks, obesity, constipation, vision loss and smoking.
Participants will attend a lecture on general women's health issues that does not address urinary incontinence.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female
- years or older
- Urinary incontinence twice weekly
- Women who have not sought medical advice for incontinence symptoms in the last 2 years.
- Fluent in English
You may not qualify if:
- Women who have received treatment for their urinary incontinence within the past two years from a health care provider with expertise in urinary incontinence management (i.e. nurse practitioners/physicians/surgeons who have a clinical practice that focuses on treating urinary incontinence).
- Women started on medications for urinary incontinence (i.e. antimuscarinic medication) within the 6 months prior to enrolment.
- Women with a history of a neurological condition (e.g. Multiple Sclerosis and spinal cord injury) because they require further investigation. Women identified to have these historical findings will be advised to speak to their physician immediately about their incontinence and the possible need for investigation.
- Women who do not consent to participate.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Brunel University
Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Tannenbaum C, Drali R, Holroyd-Leduc J, Richard L. Lessons learned: impact of a continence promotion activity for older community-dwelling women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010 Apr;29(4):540-4. doi: 10.1002/nau.20800.
PMID: 19693950BACKGROUNDTannenbaum C, Agnew R, Benedetti A, Thomas D, van den Heuvel E. Effectiveness of continence promotion for older women via community organisations: a cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 10;3(12):e004135. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004135.
PMID: 24334159DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cara Tannenbaum, MD
Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Eleanor van den Heuvel, PhD
Brunel University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2010
First Posted
November 11, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Study Completion
January 1, 2013
Last Updated
May 15, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-05