NCT01239836

Brief Summary

Urinary incontinence is a common and bothersome condition that remains frequently untreated among senior women. The aim of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of two community-based continence promotion interventions aimed at improving rates of self-care and/or professional health-care seeking in older women with urinary incontinence. The main hypothesis posits that participation in a constructivist interactive workshop combined with use of an evidence-based self-management tool will yield rates of improvement in incontinence frequency and reduce the cost of pad use by 20% compared to either intervention alone, which individually are expected to yield minimal effect sizes of at least 0.3 compared to a sham intervention.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
259

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2010

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 10, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 11, 2010

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

May 15, 2013

Status Verified

May 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

November 10, 2010

Last Update Submit

May 14, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

urinary incontinence, self-management, cost, self-efficacy, continence promotion

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incontinence frequency

    Reductions in incontinence frequency as indicated on a 72-hour voiding diary at 3-months post-intervention compared to baseline.

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Cost of pad use

    3 months

  • Self-efficacy for managing incontinence

    3-months

Study Arms (4)

Self-management

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Evidence-based self-management tool

General Health Lecture

SHAM COMPARATOR
Behavioral: General health lecture

Combined workshop and self-management

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Constructivist interactive workshop on urinary incontinenceBehavioral: Evidence-based self-management tool

Workshop

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Constructivist interactive workshop on urinary incontinence

Interventions

A one hour interactive group workshop aimed at contradicting commonly held beliefs and maladaptive practices about incontinence. The interactive continence workshop was designed to create cognitive dissonance and challenge these beliefs and practices, as well as to promote more effective therapeutic strategies for correcting urine leakage.

Combined workshop and self-managementWorkshop

Participants will receive a customized evidence-based risk factor modification self-management tool targeting up to 6 risk factors and associated therapeutic strategies. The six risk factors are pelvic floor muscle weakness, consumption of caffeinated drinks, obesity, constipation, vision loss and smoking.

Combined workshop and self-managementSelf-management

Participants will attend a lecture on general women's health issues that does not address urinary incontinence.

General Health Lecture

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Female
  • years or older
  • Urinary incontinence twice weekly
  • Women who have not sought medical advice for incontinence symptoms in the last 2 years.
  • Fluent in English

You may not qualify if:

  • Women who have received treatment for their urinary incontinence within the past two years from a health care provider with expertise in urinary incontinence management (i.e. nurse practitioners/physicians/surgeons who have a clinical practice that focuses on treating urinary incontinence).
  • Women started on medications for urinary incontinence (i.e. antimuscarinic medication) within the 6 months prior to enrolment.
  • Women with a history of a neurological condition (e.g. Multiple Sclerosis and spinal cord injury) because they require further investigation. Women identified to have these historical findings will be advised to speak to their physician immediately about their incontinence and the possible need for investigation.
  • Women who do not consent to participate.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Brunel University

Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Tannenbaum C, Drali R, Holroyd-Leduc J, Richard L. Lessons learned: impact of a continence promotion activity for older community-dwelling women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010 Apr;29(4):540-4. doi: 10.1002/nau.20800.

    PMID: 19693950BACKGROUND
  • Tannenbaum C, Agnew R, Benedetti A, Thomas D, van den Heuvel E. Effectiveness of continence promotion for older women via community organisations: a cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 10;3(12):e004135. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004135.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Incontinence

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urination DisordersUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesLower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Cara Tannenbaum, MD

    Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Eleanor van den Heuvel, PhD

    Brunel University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2010

First Posted

November 11, 2010

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion

January 1, 2013

Study Completion

January 1, 2013

Last Updated

May 15, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-05

Locations