Decision Support Workshop for Breast Reconstruction
DSW
Breast Reconstruction Decision Workshop Pilot RCT (Randomized Controlled Trial)
1 other identifier
interventional
41
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a pre-consultation decision support workshop for breast reconstruction after breast cancer, in facilitating the decision-making process, compared to routine pre-surgical education.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Sep 2012
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 6, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 17, 2015
CompletedJune 17, 2015
June 1, 2015
10 months
May 6, 2013
March 19, 2015
June 16, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Decision Self-efficacy Scale
Decision self-efficacy (DSE) scale is a prospectively designed instrument to evaluate patient self-confidence in decision-making, including shared decision-making. It has been validated among women facing treatment decisions for osteoporosis and used in cancer patients. Psychometric evaluation has shown high levels of internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.90). Decision self-efficacy is correlated with decision conflict subscales of feeling informed (r = 0.47) and supported (r = 0.45). This instrument has never been tested in the breast cancer or breast reconstruction population. The total score is calculated by summing the 11 items, dividing by 11 and multiplying by 25. Scores range from 0 (extremely low self-efficacy) to 100 (extremely high self-efficacy). The mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated at baseline and after the initial consultation. Change in score was defined as the difference in total score between baseline and after consultation.
Change from baseline decision self-efficacy at 1 week after surgical consultation
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Decision Conflict Scale
Change from baseline decision conflict at 1 week after surgical consultation
Decision Preference and Decision Choice
baseline
Patient Involvement in Care Scale (PICS)
T1 (1 week after surgical consultation)
Satisfaction With Information (Sub-scale of BREAST-Q)
T1 (1 week after surgical consultation)
Qualitative Interview Assessment
Within three months after initial consultation
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Recruitment Rate-feasibility Outcome
Duration of recruiting, expected on average two months
Retention After Randomized Treatment Assignment (Workshop and Consultation Attendance)-Feasibility Outcome
Duration of treatment-8 hours on day of treatment
Completion of Primary Outcome Measure-feasibility Outcome
1 week after initial consultation
Study Arms (2)
Decision Support Workshop
EXPERIMENTALThe decision support workshop will be 2 hours in duration on the morning of the consultation and will be facilitated by a dedicated social worker from psycho-oncology.
Standard Care
NO INTERVENTIONRoutine pre-consultation education
Interventions
Incorporates the key components of shared decision-making and decision support with the philosophy of delivering supportive care to cancer patients. * Surgeon (30 mins): treatment options for breast reconstruction with indications/ contraindications, advantages / disadvantages, expected post-operative course, aesthetic result and complications with probabilities * Registered nurse (30 mins): preparing for surgery, postoperative recovery and how to navigate the health care system * Social worker (30 mins): values clarification exercise * Breast reconstruction patient volunteer (30 mins) questions and answers about her personal experience
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient age: 18 - 79 years at the time of consultation
- In situ or invasive biopsy confirmed breast adenocarcinoma
- Considered for immediate or delayed breast reconstruction
- First consultation for breast reconstruction
You may not qualify if:
- Chest wall or atypical breast malignancy (ex: angiosarcoma) or inflammatory adenocarcinoma of the breast
- Completion any phase of reconstruction, or for revision reconstruction
- Patient cannot read or write in English.
- Cognitive impairment or uncontrolled psychiatric diagnosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Causarano N, Platt J, Baxter NN, Bagher S, Jones JM, Metcalfe KA, Hofer SO, O'Neill AC, Cheng T, Starenkyj E, Zhong T. Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2015 May;23(5):1365-75. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2479-6. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
PMID: 25351455RESULTPlatt J, Baxter N, Jones J, Metcalfe K, Causarano N, Hofer SO, O'Neill A, Cheng T, Starenkyj E, Zhong T. Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Jul 6;14:199. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-199.
PMID: 23829442DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Toni Zhong
- Organization
- University Health Network
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Toni Zhong, MD, MHS
University Health Network, Toronto
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 6, 2013
First Posted
May 20, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2013
Last Updated
June 17, 2015
Results First Posted
June 17, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-06