Vitamin D and Mammographic Breast Density
EVIDENSE
A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial of the Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Breast Density in Premenopausal Women
1 other identifier
interventional
405
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is some evidence that vitamin D could be used to reduce breast cancer risk. Randomized controlled trials would provide definitive evidence about this effect. However, trials with breast cancer as outcome are expensive and time-consuming. Use of surrogate outcomes has been advocated to accelerate progress in the identification of interventions that could prevent breast cancer. Mammographic breast density is one of the strongest breast cancer risk indicators and is already used as a surrogate outcome in several breast cancer prevention trials. The aim of this double-blind randomized controlled trial is to determine whether daily oral supplementation with vitamin D3 (1,000, 2,000 or 3,000 IU) over a period of 1 year reduces breast density in premenopausal women compared to placebo. A total of 376 women (94 per arm) who live in Quebec City will be recruited. Showing that vitamin D reduces breast density would provide strong support for the idea that vitamin D can be a safe and inexpensive approach for the prevention of breast cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Oct 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 17, 2017
CompletedMay 24, 2017
May 1, 2017
4.6 years
December 10, 2012
May 23, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mammographic breast density
Difference in breast density between baseline and at 12 months
12 months
Study Arms (4)
Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 1000 IU
EXPERIMENTALOral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation, 1000 IU daily, for 12 months
Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 2000 IU
EXPERIMENTALOral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation, 2000 IU daily, for 12 months
Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 3000 IU
EXPERIMENTALOral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation, 3000 IU daily, for 12 months
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORdaily, for 12 months
Interventions
Given orally
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- be premenopausal at baseline;
- have breast density of at least 20% at baseline;
- have normal baseline serum calcium (2,12-2,60 mmol/L) and serum creatinine (45-85 μmol/L);
- agree to have her mammogram at 12 months of follow-up at the same mammography clinic (same site) as the one where the mammogram at recruitment was done.
You may not qualify if:
- taking \> 400 IU/day of supplemental vitamin D and refusing to reduce (≤ 400 IU/day) or cease such intake;
- taking \> 600 mg/day of supplemental calcium and refusing to reduce (≤ 600 mg/day) or cease such intake;
- have contra-indications for use of vitamin D supplementation (hypersensitivity to vitamin D or its analogues; a history of renal calculi or hypercalcemia, hypervitaminosis D);
- taking medication suspected to interact with vitamin D: frequent use of antacids containing magnesium or aluminium; regular use of anticonvulsants (phenytoin, phenobarbital), digoxin, cholestyramine, colestipol, orlistat, mineral oil;
- have a personal history of breast cancer;
- have a personal history of cancer other than non-melanoma skin cancer within 5 last years;
- have had breast reduction or augmentation including breast implantation (or planning to undergo such surgery during the trial);
- be pregnant or planning a pregnancy in the next year.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- CHU de Quebec-Universite Lavallead
- Quebec Breast Cancer Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement
Québec, G1S 4L8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jacques Brisson, M.D., Sc.D.
Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, et Faculté de médecine de l'Université Laval
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2012
First Posted
December 12, 2012
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 17, 2017
Last Updated
May 24, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
We will not share IPD. Results of the study are published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention.