A Study to Collect Blood Biomarker Samples From Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) Who Received Treatment With Pegasys (Peginterferon Alfa-2a) ± Nucleoside/Nucleotide Analogue
A Phase IV, Blood Sample Collection Study For Exploratory Evaluation of the Association of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms With Treatment Responses From Subjects With HBe-Antigen Positive or Negative Chronic Hepatitis B, Who Received Therapy for Hepatitis B With Peginterferon Alfa-2a 40kD (Peg-IFN) ± Nucleos(t)Ide Analogue
1 other identifier
observational
1,669
15 countries
84
Brief Summary
This Phase 4 study is designed for the collection of blood biomarker samples from participants who have completed CHB treatment with at least 24 weeks of a pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Peg-IFN alfa-2a) containing regimen and at least 24 weeks post-treatment follow-up. Participants may be enrolled from historical studies supported or sponsored by Roche, ongoing studies supported or sponsored by Roche, or from general medical practice. The follow-up of individuals who choose to participate in this study will be in accordance with the ongoing studies or with the general medical practice of the physician. Data from whole blood deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) samples collected in the GV28555 study or available from previously collected Roche Clinical Repository (RCR) samples will be used for combined analysis with data from other applicable studies. Procedures will include blood sample collection (not applicable for participants who previously have consented and donated RCR DNA samples) and medical record capture.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2013
84 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 20, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 28, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 28, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 8, 2016
CompletedApril 5, 2017
March 1, 2017
1.3 years
May 8, 2013
March 8, 2016
March 8, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (32)
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion or Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive East Asian (CN) Population: Additive Model
Genome-wide association study (GWAS) approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of the antibody to HBeAg (anti-HBe). HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of the antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs). Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive CN Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as HBV DNA level below the lower limit of detection (LLD) of 2000 international units per milliliter (IU/mL). HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative Non-East Asian (Non-CN) Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs17037122) was included in the analysis.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative Non-CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs17037122) was included in the analysis.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative CN Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs2464266) was included in the analysis.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With Undetectable HBV DNA or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Negative Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs17037122) was included in the analysis.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBeAg Seroconversion Plus Undetectable HBV DNA, HBsAg Clearance, or Undetectable HBV DNA ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBeAg and detection of anti-HBe. Undetectable HBV DNA was defined as an HBV DNA level below the LLD of 2000 IU/mL. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA were a combined criterion in treatment response. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs12992677) was included in the analysis.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in Non-CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs12992677) was included in the analysis.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs7549785) was included in the analysis.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in CN Population: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs7549785) was included in the analysis.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Additive Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to additive models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
SNPs Associated With HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment: Dominant Model
GWAS approach was used to evaluate the association of SNPs with treatment response. HBsAg clearance was defined as the loss of HBsAg, with or without detection of anti-HBs. Associations with treatment response were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for covariates. Markers were coded according to dominant models of inheritance. Markers surpassing p-value thresholds of p\<10\^-5 and p\<5x10\^-8 were considered suggestive and genome-wide significant, respectively. Larger beta coefficients correspond to greater likelihood of treatment response. Only a single SNP (rs6592052) was included in the analysis.
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
Other Outcomes (18)
Number of Participants With HBeAg Seroconversion or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive Population
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
Number of Participants With HBeAg Seroconversion or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive CN Population
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
Number of Participants With HBeAg Seroconversion or HBsAg Clearance ≥24 Weeks Post-Treatment in HBeAg-Positive Non-CN Population
Single blood sample ≥24 weeks post-treatment
- +15 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Adult CHB Participants Treated With Peg-IFN Alfa-2a
Adult participants with CHB infection, and who have completed at least 24 weeks of Peg-IFN alfa-2a with/without nucleoside analogue therapy and at least 24 weeks of follow-up, will be included. Participants will be recruited from Roche clinical trials or general practice; no treatment will be administered in this non-interventional study.
Interventions
Participants received Peg-IFN alfa-2a prior to enrollment for at least 24 weeks. Dosing was chosen according to standard of care or at the discretion of the treating physician.
Eligibility Criteria
Participants with CHB who received therapy with Peg-IFN ± nucleoside/nucleotide analogue will be included.
You may qualify if:
- Adults greater than or equal to (≥) 18 years of age
- CHB
- Previously enrolled in a Roche study and treated for CHB for ≥24 weeks with Peg-IFN ± nucleoside analogue (lamivudine or entecavir) or Peg-IFN ± nucleotide analogue (adefovir) and with ≥24 weeks post-treatment follow-up; or
- Treated in general practice for CHB with Peg-IFN according to standard of care and in line with the current Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC)/local labeling who have no contraindication to Peg-IFN therapy as per local label and have been treated with Peg-IFN for ≥24 weeks and have ≥24 week post-treatment response available at the time of blood sample collection
You may not qualify if:
- Hepatitis A, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (84)
Medizinische Universität Wien; Univ.Klinik für Innere Medizin III - Gastroenterologie & Hepatologie
Vienna, 1090, Austria
MHAT Tokuda Hospital Sofia; Department of Gastroenterology at Clinic of Internal Deseases
Sofia, 1407, Bulgaria
Mhat Sveta Marina; Clinic of Gastroenterology
Varna, 9010, Bulgaria
Beijing Ditan Hospital
Beijing, 100011, China
Beijing 302 Hospital; No. 2 Infectious Disease Section
Beijing, 100039, China
Peking University People's Hospital
Beijing, 100044, China
Beijing You An Hospital; Digestive Dept
Beijing, 100069, China
Xiangya Hospital of Centre-South University
Changsha, 410008, China
West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu, 610041, China
The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, 400010, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
Fuzhou, 350005, China
The Eighth People's Hospital of Guangzhou
Guangzhou, 510060, China
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Guangzhou, 510515, China
Guangdong General Hospital
Guangzhou, China
Hangzhou Sixth People's Hospital
Hangzhou, China
The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
Harbin, 150001, China
Jinan Infectious Diseases Hospital
Jinan, 250021, China
Nanjing No.2 Hospital; Liver Disease Department
Nanjing, 210003, China
The First Affiliate Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
Nanning, 530021, China
Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Shanghai, 200021, China
Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center
Shanghai, 201508, China
Shenzhen Donghu Hospital
Shenzhen, 518020, China
The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University
Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Hospital of Chinese Traditional Medicine
Ürümqi, 830001, China
Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med. Col, Huazhong Univ. of Sci. & Tech
Wuhan, 430030, China
The Second Affiliated Hospital of The Fourth Military Medical University (Tangdu Hospital)
Xi'an, 710038, China
General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
Yinchuan, 750004, China
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
Zhengzhou, 450003, China
Hopital Beaujon;Hepatologie
Clichy, 92118, France
Hopital Henri Mondor; Hepatologie Gastro Enterologie
Créteil, 94010, France
Hopital de Pontchaillou; Medicine Interne - Hepatologie
Rennes, 35033, France
Institut Arnault Tzanck; Medecine I Gastro Enterologie
Saint-Laurent-du-Var, 06721, France
Praxis Dr. med. Christine John
Berlin, 10117, Germany
Praxis Dr. Heyne
Berlin, 10969, Germany
Charité Uni.-medizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum; Med. Klinik m.S. Hepatologie Gastroenterologie
Berlin, 13353, Germany
Ifi- Studien und Projekte GmbH, An der Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
Hamburg, 20099, Germany
Medizinische Hochschule Zentrum Innere Medizin Abt.Gastroenterologie, Endokrinologie und Hepatologie
Hanover, 30625, Germany
Laiko General Hospital Athen; Uni Clinic of Gastrenterology
Athens, 115 27, Greece
University Hospital of Larissa; Pathological Clinic
Larissa, 41 110, Greece
Hippokratio Hospital; 4Th Internal Medicine Dpt
Thessaloniki, 546 42, Greece
Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Consorziale di Bari; Clinica Malattie Infettive
Bari, Apulia, 70124, Italy
Ospedale de Bellis; Reparto Medicina Generale
Castellana Grotte, Apulia, 70013, Italy
Az. Osp. S. Sebastiano; Divisione Malattie Infettive
Caserta, Campania, 81100, Italy
Az. Osp. Cardarelli; Unita Operativa A Struttura Complessa Di Epatologia
Napoli, Campania, 80131, Italy
UNI DEGLI STUDI - POLICLINICA S. ORSOLA; Dipartimento Malattie dell'Apparato Digerente e Medicina In
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40138, Italy
Az. Osp. Uni Ria Di Parma; Gastro-Enterology
Parma, Emilia-Romagna, 43100, Italy
Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Gastroenterologia
Milan, Lombardy, 20122, Italy
Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Iii Divisione Medicina Generale
Milan, Lombardy, 20122, Italy
Uni Di Cagliari; Dept. Di Scienze Mediche
Cagliari, Sardinia, 09042, Italy
Istituto Di Clinica Medica 1 A; Divisione Di Medicina Generale E Gastroenterologia
Palermo, Sicily, 90127, Italy
Ospedale Cisanello - Az. Osp. Pisana; Unità Operativa Di Gastroenterologia Ed Epatologia
Pisa, Tuscany, 56124, Italy
Az. Osp. Di Padova; Dipart. Scienze Chirurgiche E Gastroent.
Padua, Veneto, 35128, Italy
Auckland Hospital; New Zealand Liver Transplant Unit
Auckland, 100, New Zealand
Hospital For Infectious Diseases; Infectiology
Bydgoszcz, 85-030, Poland
Szpital Specjalistyczny; Oddzial Obserwacyjno - Zakayny
Chorzów, 41-500, Poland
Krakowski Szpital Specjalistyczny im. Jana Pawla II; Oddzial Wirusowego Zapalenia Watroby
Krakow, 31-202, Poland
Specjalistyczny Szpital Wojewódzki im. Biegańskiego; Klinika Chorób Zakaźnych i Hepatologii UM
Lodz, 91-347, Poland
Wojewodzki Szpital Zakazny; Klinika Chorob Zakaznych
Warsaw, 01-201, Poland
Centralny Szpital Kliniczny MSWiA; Oddzial Chorob Wewnetrznych i Hepatologii
Warsaw, 02-507, Poland
NZOZ Lubuska Specjalistyczna Poradnia Chorob Watroby
Zielona Góra, 65-044, Poland
Centrum Medyczne
Łańcut, 37-100, Poland
Hospital de Santa Maria; Servico de Gastrenterologia e Hepatologia
Lisbon, 1649-035, Portugal
Hospital Geral de Santo Antonio; Servico de Gastrenterologia
Porto, 4099-001, Portugal
Hospital de Sao Joao; Servico de Gastrenterologia
Porto, 4202-451, Portugal
Institutul De Boli Infectioase Matei Bals; Sectia Clinica II Boli Infectioase Adulti
Bucharest, 021105, Romania
The Hospital of Tropical and Infectious Disease Victor Babes
Bucharest, 030303, Romania
Clinical Infectious Diseases Hospital Victor Babes
Craiova, 200515, Romania
Inje University Busan Paik Hospital; Nephrology
Busan, 633-165, South Korea
Chooncheon Sacred Heart Hospital
Chooncheon, 200-060, South Korea
Samsung Medical Center; Gastroenterology
Seoul, 135-710, South Korea
Changhua Christian Hospital; Internal Medicine
Changhua, 500, Taiwan
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital; Dept of Internal Medicine
Kaohsiung City, 00833, Taiwan
Kaohsiung Medical Uni Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital; Dept of Internal Medicine
Kaohsiung City, 807, Taiwan
Chang Gung Medical Foundation - Keelung; Dept. of Hepato-Gastroenterology
Keelung, 204, Taiwan
China Medical University Hospital; Department of Rheumatology
Taichung, 404, Taiwan
National Taiwan Uni Hospital; Gastro-Enterology Dept.
Taipei, 100, Taiwan
Taipei Veterans General Hospital; Gastroenterology Division
Taipei, 112, Taiwan
Tri-Service Hospital; Dept. of Internal Medicine
Taipei, Taiwan
Chang Gung Medical Foundation - Linkou; Dept. of Hepato-Gastroenterology
Taoyuan District, 333, Taiwan
Siriraj Hospital
Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
Chiang Mai Uni Hospital; Faculty of Medicine
Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
Songklanagarind Hospital; Division of Gastroenterology
Songkhla, 90112, Thailand
The Royal London Hospital
London, E1 1BB, United Kingdom
Manchester Royal Infirmary; Department Of Medicine
Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Wei L, Pavlovic V, Bansal AT, Chen X, Foster GR, He H, Kao JH, Lampertico P, Liaw YF, Motoc A, Papatheodoridis GV, Piratvisuth T, Plesniak R, Wat C. Genetic variation in FCER1A predicts peginterferon alfa-2a-induced hepatitis B surface antigen clearance in East Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat. 2019 Sep;26(9):1040-1049. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13107. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
PMID: 30972912DERIVED
Biospecimen
Whole blood samples
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Communications
- Organization
- Hoffmann-LaRoche
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Trials
Hoffmann-La Roche
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2013
First Posted
May 17, 2013
Study Start
August 20, 2013
Primary Completion
November 28, 2014
Study Completion
November 28, 2014
Last Updated
April 5, 2017
Results First Posted
April 8, 2016
Record last verified: 2017-03