Microcurrent and Aerobic Exercise Effects on Abdominal Fat
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to analyze microcurrent short and long term effects used with aerobic exercise on abdominal fat.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 18, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 15, 2013
CompletedMay 15, 2013
May 1, 2013
2 months
April 18, 2013
May 9, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
subcutaneous abdominal fat and viceral abdominal fat
Ultrasound was performed at the end of expiration to measure subcutaneous abdominal fat between xiphoid apophysis and navel, below navel, and above left and right anterior superior iliac spine. Between xiphoid apophysis and navel was also measured visceral abdominal fat
five weeks after the intervencion
Secondary Outcomes (4)
bioimpedance values
five weeks after the intervencion
cholesterol, triglycerides and glucose levels
five weeks after intervention
perimeters measurements
five weeks after intervencion
Suprailiac, vertical and horizontal abdominal skinfolds
five weeks after intervencion
Other Outcomes (2)
International Physical Activity Questionnaire
five weeks after the intervencion
Food Frequency Questionnaire
five weeks after intervencion
Study Arms (5)
Exercise after, Transcutaneos, 25-10Hz
EXPERIMENTALExperimental group 1 performed aerobic exercise just after microcurrent in the abdominal region with four transcutaneous electrodes in a parallel position, intensity below the sensivity threshold and a maximum of 1 mA. Every 15 minutes changed from 25Hz to 10 Hz.
25-50Hz microcurrent
EXPERIMENTALExperimental group 2 performed aerobic exercise just after microcurrent in the abdominal region with four transcutaneous electrodes in a parallel position, intensity below the sensivity threshold and a maximum of 1 mA. Every 15 minutes changed from 25Hz to 50Hz.
percutaneous microcurrent
EXPERIMENTALExperimental group 3 performed aerobic exercise just after microcurrent in the abdominal region with four percutaneous electrodes in a parallel position, intensity below the sensivity threshold and a maximum of 1 mA. Every 15 minutes changed from 25Hz to 10 Hz.
Exercise at same time
EXPERIMENTALExperimental group 4 performed aerobic exercise at the same time microcurrent in the abdominal region with four transcutaneous electrodes in a parallel position, intensity below the sensivity threshold and a maximum of 1 mA. Every 15 minutes changed from 25Hz to 10 Hz.
Control Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORControl group performed aerobic exercise just after microcurrent in the abdominal region with four transcutaneous electrodes in a parallel position, but microcurrent device was switched off.
Interventions
Aerobic exercise just after microcurrent in the abdominal region, intensity below the sensivity threshold and a maximum of 1 mA. 30 minutes of aerobic moderate-intensity exercise (50%VO2 max) using Karvonen´s formula, performed on a cycloergometer. Were used Borg scale (12-13) and Polar® heart monitors to control heart rate.
Aerobic exercise at the same time microcurrent in the abdominal region, intensity below the sensivity threshold and a maximum of 1 mA. 30 minutes of aerobic moderate-intensity exercise (50%VO2 max) using Karvonen´s formula, performed on a cycloergometer. Were used Borg scale (12-13) and Polar® heart monitors to control heart rate.
Microcurrent device in the abdominal region with four transcutaneous electrodes in a parallel position, intensity below the sensivity threshold and a maximum of 1 mA.
Microcurrent device in the abdominal region with four percutaneous electrodes in a parallel position, intensity below the sensivity threshold and a maximum of 1 mA.
microcurrent device in the abdominal whith intensity below the sensivity threshold and a maximum of 1 mA. Every 15 minutes changed from 25Hz to 10 Hz.
microcurrent device in the abdominal whith intensity below the sensivity threshold and a maximum of 1 mA. Every 15 minutes changed from 25Hz to 50 Hz.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age between 18 and 30 years
- presenting a normal to pre-obese body mass index (18.5 - 29.9 Kg/m2)
- moderate physical activity level (between 600 and 3000 metabolic-minute/week (MET-min/week)) scored by International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
You may not qualify if:
- submitted to other fat reduce procedure
- to show cardiovascular risk factors or diseases and/or any physical condition limiting aerobic exercise
- to present any contra indications to microcurrent and/or aerobic exercise
- to take medication that influence lipid metabolism, and to be pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Andreia Noites
Vila Nova de Gaia, Porto District, 4400-303, Portugal
Andreia Noites
Vila Nova de Gaia, Porto District, 4400-330, Portugal
Related Publications (4)
Despres JP, Lemieux I. Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2006 Dec 14;444(7121):881-7. doi: 10.1038/nature05488.
PMID: 17167477BACKGROUNDDonnelly JE, Blair SN, Jakicic JM, Manore MM, Rankin JW, Smith BK; American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Appropriate physical activity intervention strategies for weight loss and prevention of weight regain for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Feb;41(2):459-71. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181949333.
PMID: 19127177BACKGROUNDRibeiro-Filho FF, Faria AN, Azjen S, Zanella MT, Ferreira SR. Methods of estimation of visceral fat: advantages of ultrasonography. Obes Res. 2003 Dec;11(12):1488-94. doi: 10.1038/oby.2003.199.
PMID: 14694213BACKGROUNDHamida ZH, Comtois AS, Portmann M, Boucher JP, Savard R. Effect of electrical stimulation on lipolysis of human white adipocytes. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Apr;36(2):271-5. doi: 10.1139/h11-011.
PMID: 21609289BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andreia Noites, MSc
Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde do Porto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 18, 2013
First Posted
May 15, 2013
Study Start
July 1, 2011
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
September 1, 2011
Last Updated
May 15, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-05