Study of SANGUINATE™ Versus Hydroxyurea in Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) Patients
A Phase I Open-label, Randomized, Safety and Efficacy Study of SANGUINATE™ at Two Doses Levels Versus Hydroxyurea in Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) Patients.
1 other identifier
interventional
24
2 countries
4
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety of SANGUINATE™ versus Hydroxyurea in patients suffering from Sickle Cell Disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started May 2013
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedDecember 3, 2014
December 1, 2014
1.2 years
April 23, 2013
December 2, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To Compare SANGUINATE™ and Hydroxyurea in Sickle Cell Disease patients.
Compare pain management between SANGUINATE™ and Hydroxyurea using 0-10 Numeric Pain Scale.
7 days
Study Arms (2)
SANGUINATE™
EXPERIMENTALPEG-bHb-CO
Hydroxyurea
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard of care for Sickle Cell treatment, 15 mg/kg.
Interventions
Standard of care for Sickle Cell treatment, 15 mg/kg.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with Homozygous (HbSS) Sickle Cell Anemia;
- Hb levels: \>6g/dL - \<10g/dL;
- Age : \>18 years old;
- Frequency of ER hospitalizations \< 6x/yr for SCD pain events documented "medical history".
You may not qualify if:
- Patients, who are on chronic transfusion program, defined as regular transfusions every 2-8 weeks;
- Allergic to Hydroxyurea;
- History of clinical significant disease, as determined by the Investigator;
- History of allergy or major allergic reaction considered to be clinically significant by the Investigator;
- Screening assessments considered to be abnormal by the Investigator;
- Patient has sever pulmonary hypertension (index \>3 meters per sec);
- Donated blood within 60 days of screening or otherwise experienced blood loss of \>250 mL within the same period;
- Intending to begin new concomitant drug therapy or over-the-counter medication anytime from scree4nin to the time of administration of study drug;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Fundacion BIOS
Barranquilla, Colombia
Fundacion Reina Isabel
Cali, Colombia
Hospital Pablo TobinUribe
Medellín, Colombia
PAMRI
Panama City, Panama
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kenny M Galvez, MD
Hospital Pablo Tobin Uribe
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Luis F Uribe, MD
Fundacion Reina Isabel
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nestor Sosa, MD
Hospital Punta Pacifica
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Angel Hernandez, MD
Fundacion BIOS
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2013
First Posted
May 8, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
July 1, 2014
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 3, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-12