NCT01847885

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if electrical stimulation (small levels of electricity) reduces post-stroke shoulder pain. This study involves a device called the Smartpatch System. The Smartpatch System delivers mild electrical stimulation to the muscles in the shoulder. The Smartpatch System includes a small wire (called a "Lead") that is placed through the skin into the muscle of the shoulder. It also includes a device worn on the body that delivers stimulation (called the Smartpatch Stimulator).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
88

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2013

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 23, 2013

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 7, 2013

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 21, 2015

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 14, 2016

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 16, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

October 16, 2017

Status Verified

October 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

April 23, 2013

Results QC Date

September 7, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 12, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

electrical stimulationneurostimulationneuromodulationpost-stroke shoulder painhemiplegic shoulder pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change From Baseline Shoulder Pain Intensity at End of Treatment (EOT)

    A diary was used in the study to capture daily worst shoulder pain intensity over a 7-day period. The diary included a pain intensity question asked each day to the subject. The pain intensity question is excerpted from the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form Question 3 (BPI-3) and is stated as "please rate your pain by circling the one number that best describes your pain at its worst in the last 24 hours". BPI-3 is a scale of 0 to 10 where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain. The median scores were calculated for each diary period. The median diary score at End of Treatment (EOT) was compared to the median baseline diary score to calculate the change in pain intensity. The group mean of the median scores for treatment was compared to the group mean of the medians scores for the control group at baseline and at EOT.

    Baseline, End of Treatment (4-weeks of Treatment/Control)

  • Number of Participants With Device Related Adverse Event Rates in Treatment and Control Groups

    At each study visit following the baseline assessment, subjects were questioned if any changes in their medical status or condition had occurred. If the change was an adverse event, an adverse event form was completed by the site.

    16 weeks total - 4 weeks from baseline visit to EOT visit, followed by 12 weeks post-treatment

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Change From Baseline Shoulder Pain Interference at End of Treatment

    Baseline, End of Treatment (4-weeks of Treatment/Control)

  • Durability of Change From Baseline Shoulder Pain Intensity at 12-weeks Beyond Treatment

    Baseline, 12-wks post-treatment

  • Change From Baseline Quality of Life at End of Treatment

    Baseline, End of Treatment (4-weeks of Treatment/Control)

  • Change From Baseline Average Pain Intensity at End of Treatment

    Baseline, End of Treatment (4-weeks of Treatment/Control)

  • Patient Global Impression of Change at End of Treatment

    End of Treatment (4-weeks of Treatment/Control)

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (3)

  • User Satisfaction With The Smartpatch System at End of Treatment

    End of Treatment (4-weeks of Treatment/Control)

  • User Satisfaction With The Smartpatch System at 12-weeks Beyond Treatment

    12-week post-treatment

  • Performance of the Smartpatch System

    At completion of study, approximately 2.5 years

Study Arms (2)

Smartpatch Treatment Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects in the Treatment Group will have a Smartpatch Lead placed in the shoulder, will use the Smartpatch Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System, and will receive electrical stimulation.

Device: Smartpatch Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System

Smartpatch Control Group

SHAM COMPARATOR

Subjects in the Control Group will have a Smartpatch Lead placed in the shoulder, will use the Smartpatch Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System, but will not receive any electrical stimulation.

Device: Smartpatch Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System

Interventions

The Smartpatch System is an Investigation Device which delivers mild electrical stimulation to the muscles in the shoulder. The Smartpatch System includes a small wire (called a "Lead") that is placed through the skin into the muscle of the shoulder. It also includes a device worn on the body that delivers stimulation (called the Smartpatch Stimulator).

Also known as: Smartpatch System, Smartpatch
Smartpatch Control GroupSmartpatch Treatment Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • At least 21 years of age
  • Post-stroke shoulder pain
  • At least 6 months after stroke that caused shoulder pain

You may not qualify if:

  • Use of habit-forming (narcotic) medications
  • Bleeding disorder
  • History of recurrent skin infections
  • Parkinson's Disease, Spinal Cord Injury, traumatic brain injury, Multiple Sclerosis, or Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
  • Heart arrhythmia or artificial heart valves
  • Uncontrolled seizures
  • Implanted Electronic Device
  • Pregnant

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Kessler Foundation Research Center

West Orange, New Jersey, 07052, United States

Location

Weill Cornell Medical Center

New York, New York, 10065, United States

Location

Carolinas Rehabilitation/Carolinas Healthcare

Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203, United States

Location

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Drug Delivery Systems

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Drug TherapyTherapeutics

Limitations and Caveats

This study included a pre-planned interim analysis for sample size re-estimation. The study was suspended because the treatment effect (both groups experienced clinically significant reductions in pain) required a sample size more than 90 subjects.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clinical Affairs
Organization
SPR Therapeutics

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2013

First Posted

May 7, 2013

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion

August 21, 2015

Study Completion

November 14, 2016

Last Updated

October 16, 2017

Results First Posted

October 16, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-10

Locations