Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Post-Stroke Shoulder Pain Using the Smartpatch System
A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Control Multicenter Pivotal Study of the Smartpatch Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System for the Treatment of Chronic Post-Stroke Shoulder Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
88
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if electrical stimulation (small levels of electricity) reduces post-stroke shoulder pain. This study involves a device called the Smartpatch System. The Smartpatch System delivers mild electrical stimulation to the muscles in the shoulder. The Smartpatch System includes a small wire (called a "Lead") that is placed through the skin into the muscle of the shoulder. It also includes a device worn on the body that delivers stimulation (called the Smartpatch Stimulator).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 21, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 14, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 16, 2017
CompletedOctober 16, 2017
October 1, 2017
2.4 years
April 23, 2013
September 7, 2017
October 12, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline Shoulder Pain Intensity at End of Treatment (EOT)
A diary was used in the study to capture daily worst shoulder pain intensity over a 7-day period. The diary included a pain intensity question asked each day to the subject. The pain intensity question is excerpted from the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form Question 3 (BPI-3) and is stated as "please rate your pain by circling the one number that best describes your pain at its worst in the last 24 hours". BPI-3 is a scale of 0 to 10 where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain. The median scores were calculated for each diary period. The median diary score at End of Treatment (EOT) was compared to the median baseline diary score to calculate the change in pain intensity. The group mean of the median scores for treatment was compared to the group mean of the medians scores for the control group at baseline and at EOT.
Baseline, End of Treatment (4-weeks of Treatment/Control)
Number of Participants With Device Related Adverse Event Rates in Treatment and Control Groups
At each study visit following the baseline assessment, subjects were questioned if any changes in their medical status or condition had occurred. If the change was an adverse event, an adverse event form was completed by the site.
16 weeks total - 4 weeks from baseline visit to EOT visit, followed by 12 weeks post-treatment
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change From Baseline Shoulder Pain Interference at End of Treatment
Baseline, End of Treatment (4-weeks of Treatment/Control)
Durability of Change From Baseline Shoulder Pain Intensity at 12-weeks Beyond Treatment
Baseline, 12-wks post-treatment
Change From Baseline Quality of Life at End of Treatment
Baseline, End of Treatment (4-weeks of Treatment/Control)
Change From Baseline Average Pain Intensity at End of Treatment
Baseline, End of Treatment (4-weeks of Treatment/Control)
Patient Global Impression of Change at End of Treatment
End of Treatment (4-weeks of Treatment/Control)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
User Satisfaction With The Smartpatch System at End of Treatment
End of Treatment (4-weeks of Treatment/Control)
User Satisfaction With The Smartpatch System at 12-weeks Beyond Treatment
12-week post-treatment
Performance of the Smartpatch System
At completion of study, approximately 2.5 years
Study Arms (2)
Smartpatch Treatment Group
EXPERIMENTALSubjects in the Treatment Group will have a Smartpatch Lead placed in the shoulder, will use the Smartpatch Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System, and will receive electrical stimulation.
Smartpatch Control Group
SHAM COMPARATORSubjects in the Control Group will have a Smartpatch Lead placed in the shoulder, will use the Smartpatch Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System, but will not receive any electrical stimulation.
Interventions
The Smartpatch System is an Investigation Device which delivers mild electrical stimulation to the muscles in the shoulder. The Smartpatch System includes a small wire (called a "Lead") that is placed through the skin into the muscle of the shoulder. It also includes a device worn on the body that delivers stimulation (called the Smartpatch Stimulator).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 21 years of age
- Post-stroke shoulder pain
- At least 6 months after stroke that caused shoulder pain
You may not qualify if:
- Use of habit-forming (narcotic) medications
- Bleeding disorder
- History of recurrent skin infections
- Parkinson's Disease, Spinal Cord Injury, traumatic brain injury, Multiple Sclerosis, or Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
- Heart arrhythmia or artificial heart valves
- Uncontrolled seizures
- Implanted Electronic Device
- Pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Kessler Foundation Research Center
West Orange, New Jersey, 07052, United States
Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York, 10065, United States
Carolinas Rehabilitation/Carolinas Healthcare
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203, United States
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study included a pre-planned interim analysis for sample size re-estimation. The study was suspended because the treatment effect (both groups experienced clinically significant reductions in pain) required a sample size more than 90 subjects.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Affairs
- Organization
- SPR Therapeutics
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2013
First Posted
May 7, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
August 21, 2015
Study Completion
November 14, 2016
Last Updated
October 16, 2017
Results First Posted
October 16, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10