vNOTES vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Randomized Trial on Pain and Recovery"
VNOTES-TLH
Comparison of vNOTES and Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study of Pain, Opioid Use, and Quality of Recovery
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing two different minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques: vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). The aim is to evaluate whether vNOTES provides better postoperative comfort and recovery by reducing pain, lowering opioid analgesic requirements, and improving early recovery outcomes. Approximately 80 women undergoing elective hysterectomy will be randomly assigned to either vNOTES or TLH. All surgeries will be performed under standardized general anesthesia by the same experienced surgical team. Postoperative pain management will follow an identical protocol for all patients. Primary outcomes include postoperative pain scores (at 12 and 24 hours) and total opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes include Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores, fatigue scores, time to first mobilization, time to first flatus, and length of hospital stay. The results of this study may help identify which hysterectomy technique offers better patient-centered recovery and postoperative comfort.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 8, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 9, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 10, 2026
CompletedApril 15, 2026
April 1, 2026
3 months
December 2, 2025
April 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative Pain Intensity (NRS)
Postoperative pain intensity will be assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
At 12 and 24 hours postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Need for Rescue Analgesia Within 24 Hours
First 24 postoperative hours
Time to First Mobilization
From the end of surgery until the first ambulation out of bed, assessed up to 48 hours postoperatively.
Time to First Flatus
Time Frame: From the end of surgery until the first passage of flatus, assessed during the postoperative hospital stay, up to 7 days postoperatively or until hospital discharge, whichever comes first.
Length of Postoperative Hospital Stay
Time Frame: From the day of surgery until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days postoperatively or until discharge, whichever comes first.
Change in QoR-15 Score from Baseline to 24 Hours
Time Frame: Preoperative (within 24 hours before surgery) and 24 hours postoperatively
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
vNOTES Group
EXPERIMENTALPatients undergo vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy (vNOTES) using a transvaginal access port with a maximum pneumoperitoneum pressure not exceeding 15 mmHg.
TLH Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients undergo conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy using a camera port and accessory trocars from the umbilicus, and pneumoperitoneum is maintained at a pressure not exceeding 15 mmHg.
Interventions
Transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy is performed through a vaginal natural opening via transvaginal access using a self-adhering vaginal port.
It is a conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy performed using an umbilical cord port and two accessory trocars.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients aged 18 to 75 years
- ASA physical status I-II
- Scheduled for elective laparoscopic hysterectomy (benign indications such as myoma uteri, adenomyosis, endometrial hyperplasia)
- Able to understand study procedures and provide written informed consent
- Able to complete postoperative questionnaires (QoR-15 and Fatigue Assessment Scale)
You may not qualify if:
- ASA III-IV status
- Severe cardiopulmonary disease or contraindication to general anesthesia
- Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders
- Active pelvic infection
- History of extensive pelvic or abdominal surgery complicating minimally invasive access
- Cognitive impairment or inability to complete questionnaires
- Conversion to laparotomy
- Known allergy or intolerance to study medications (paracetamol, tramadol)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital
Diyarbakır, Turkey, 21070, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Fang S, Xia Y, Jin J, Zhang J, Lu L. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Vaginally Assisted NOTES Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Primary Hospitals: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Invest Surg. 2025 Dec;38(1):2515054. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2025.2515054. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
PMID: 40492370BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fatma Acil, M.D.
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Investigators responsible for postoperative data collection and analysis and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. These investigators were not involved in the surgical or anesthetic management of the patients. Due to the nature of the surgical procedures, blinding of participants and care providers was not feasible.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2025
First Posted
December 29, 2025
Study Start
January 8, 2026
Primary Completion
April 9, 2026
Study Completion
April 10, 2026
Last Updated
April 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04