NCT01810653

Brief Summary

The study design combines a long-term safety and a dose range determination objective. The first 8 weeks of the study were primarily intended for the dose range determination, while the later visits were used for the comparison of long-term safety between the groups.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
97

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2006

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2006

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2008

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 12, 2013

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 13, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

August 13, 2015

Status Verified

August 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

March 12, 2013

Last Update Submit

August 12, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Macrogol

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Symptom Based Weekly Total Sum Score (TSS) Over 52 Weeks

    Baseline (Week 0), Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52

  • Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Week 52

    Baseline, Week 52

  • Short Term Change of Total Sum Score (TSS): Average of Weeks 1 to 8 Minus Baseline

    Average of Weeks 1 to 8

  • Long Term Change of Total Sum Score (TSS): Average of Weeks 26 and 52 Minus Baseline

    Average of Weeks 26 and 52

  • Overall Change of Total Sum Score (TSS): Average of all Diaries Obtained Minus Baseline

    Average up to 52 weeks

  • Dose Range Determination: Mean Dose Based on Sachets Used

    Up to 52 weeks.

  • Dose Range Determination: Mean Dose per Kilogram Body Weight Based on Sachets Used

    Up to 52 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (20)

  • Percentage of Treatment Success

    Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52

  • Individual Symptoms: Defecation Frequency

    Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52

  • Individual Symptoms: Consistency of the Feces

    Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52

  • Individual Symptoms: Strains During Defecation

    Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52

  • Individual Symptoms: Quantity of Stools

    Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52

  • +15 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Macrogol (Transipeg)

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Macrogol (Transipeg, BAY81-8430)

Macrogol (Forlax)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Macrogol (Forlax)

Interventions

Up to 4 sachets per day based on individual titration

Macrogol (Transipeg)

Up to 4 sachets per day based on individual titration

Macrogol (Forlax)

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Months - 15 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Childhood functional constipation
  • months to \<16 years of age
  • Male or female
  • For females of childbearing potential (after menarche): negative pregnancy test
  • Moderately severe to severe constipation, defined as stool frequency \<3 stools/week
  • Informed consent signed by parent(s) or legal acceptable representative(s), after sufficient oral and written information before entering the study, to be documented by the investigators in the Case Report Form

You may not qualify if:

  • Functional non-retentive fecal incontinence
  • Known metabolic or endocrine disorders (s.a. hypothyroidism)
  • Neurologic disorders (s.a. spina bifida or spinal cord anomaly)
  • Hirschsprung's disease (congenital megacolon)
  • Anal anomaly
  • Gastrointestinal surgery
  • Drug induced constipation
  • Mental retardation
  • Cerebral palsy
  • Treatment with other laxatives
  • Drugs influencing gastrointestinal function (e.g., cisapride, erythromicin, imodium)
  • Prior bowel surgery, except appendectomy
  • Earlier participation in this trial
  • Concurrent participation in any other clinical trial

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Unknown Facility

Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Eindhoven, 5623 EJ, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Veldhoven, 5504 DB, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Woerden, 3447 GN, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bekkali NLH, Hoekman DR, Liem O, Bongers MEJ, van Wijk MP, Zegers B, Pelleboer RA, Verwijs W, Koot BGP, Voropaiev M, Benninga MA. Polyethylene Glycol 3350 With Electrolytes Versus Polyethylene Glycol 4000 for Constipation: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018 Jan;66(1):10-15. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001726.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Constipation

Interventions

Polyethylene Glycols

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ethylene GlycolsGlycolsAlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsPolymersMacromolecular SubstancesBiomedical and Dental MaterialsManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Officials

  • Bayer Study Director

    Bayer

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2013

First Posted

March 13, 2013

Study Start

April 1, 2006

Primary Completion

December 1, 2008

Study Completion

December 1, 2008

Last Updated

August 13, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-08

Locations