NCT00153140

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of extended polyethyleneglycol3350 use to tegaserod in patients with chronic constipation.

Trial Health

80
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
239

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

25 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2004

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2004

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 7, 2005

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 12, 2005

Completed
Last Updated

February 7, 2013

Status Verified

February 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

September 7, 2005

Last Update Submit

February 6, 2013

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • A successful outcome is defined as no longer meeting the definition of constipation using ROME I criteria

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Analysis of individual ROME I criteria

  • Safety (adverse event review)

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 64 Years
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female outpatients at least 18 years of age
  • Constipated according to ROME I criteria
  • If female and of childbearing potential, patient must be surgically sterilized or using oral contraceptives, depot contraceptives, double- barrier method, intrauterine device, or testifies that she is monogamous with a vasectomized partner, or practices abstinence and will continue to do so during the duration of study
  • Are otherwise in good health, as judged by a physical examination
  • In the investigator's judgment, patient is mentally competent to sign an instrument of informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with heme positive stool at screening that is not associated with hemorrhoids or anal fissures.
  • Patients with hypo- or hyperthyroidism as determined by medical history.
  • Patients with severe renal impairment.
  • Patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment.
  • Patients with known or suspected perforation or obstruction.
  • History of gastric retention, inflammatory bowel disease, bowel resection, or colostomy.
  • Patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease, suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, or abdominal adhesions.
  • Patients with a known history of organic cause for their constipation.
  • Patients currently taking, or planning to take any of the following medications that are known to effect bowel habits:
  • Antidiarrheals
  • Antacids containing magnesium or aluminum salts
  • Anticholinergics
  • Antispasmodic agents
  • Erythromycin and other macrolides
  • Octreotide
  • +13 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (25)

Unknown Facility

Mobile, Alabama, 36693, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Glendale, Arizona, 85306, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Anaheim, California, 92801, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sacramento, California, 95825, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Diego, California, 92103, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lake Worth, Florida, 33461, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Largo, Florida, 33770, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St. Petersburg, Florida, 33707, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Laurel, Maryland, 20707, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St Louis, Missouri, 63017, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45236, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Greer, South Carolina, 29651, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Memphis, Tennessee, 38120, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Austin, Texas, 78705, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Dallas, Texas, 75234, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fort Worth, Texas, 76135, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Angelo, Texas, 76904, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84121, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Newport News, Virginia, 23606, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Norfolk, Virginia, 23502, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Richmond, Virginia, 23294, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Di Palma JA, Cleveland MV, McGowan J, Herrera JL. A randomized, multicenter comparison of polyethylene glycol laxative and tegaserod in treatment of patients with chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Sep;102(9):1964-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01365.x. Epub 2007 Jun 15.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Constipation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Jorge Herrera, MD

    University of South Alabama

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2005

First Posted

September 12, 2005

Study Start

July 1, 2004

Primary Completion

October 1, 2004

Last Updated

February 7, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-02

Locations