Conventional Alignment System Versus Surgical Navigation System in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Conventional Tibial Extramedullary Alignment System Versus a Hand-Held, Surgical Navigation System for Tibial Component Placement in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a randomized, controlled, blinded prospective study comparing the use of the usual cutting guides with a palm-sized digital surgical navigation system in unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Analysis of pre- and post-operative X-rays will be used to compare alignment of the tibial (shinbone) implant components. The investigators expect that the FDA-approved hand-held surgical navigation device will increase the accuracy and precision of the tibial cut by telling the surgeon the exact position of the cutting block before the surgeon makes the cut, allowing minor adjustments to be made. The investigators expect the conventional device to take less time to use, but that this difference will decrease as the surgeon becomes more familiar with the device. The investigators expect the intraoperative measurements acquired by the KneeAlign system to strongly correlate with the radiographic alignments measured postoperatively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 16, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 11, 2017
CompletedJuly 11, 2017
July 1, 2017
2.2 years
February 7, 2013
March 28, 2017
July 10, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative Tibial Component Alignment
The primary outcome will be the number of patients (percentage of patients) that met a predetermined criteria for Alignment as defined by within 2° of perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis or 2° of a 3° posterior slope, postoperative tibial component alignment (mechanical varus/valgus, and posterior slope) as measured on postoperative standing anteroposterior hip-to-ankle radiographs, and standing, lateral knee-to-ankle radiographs, respectively.
6 weeks after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Time Required to Utilize System
Minutes during surgery ( Estimated time per surgery 1 hour)
Study Arms (2)
Conventional System
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional tibial extramedullary alignment system used by surgeon during surgery.
KneeAlign System
EXPERIMENTALDigital hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial component placement used by surgeon during surgery.
Interventions
Digital hand-held surgical navigation system used for tibial component placement in total knee arthroplasty
This is the standard of care for total knee arthroplasty.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- a history of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or post-traumatic arthritis
- patients who have been indicated for a primary, posterior-stabilized, total knee arthroplasty
- patients have had a preoperative standing anteroposterior hip-to-ankle radiograph and standing lateral knee-to-ankle radiographs
You may not qualify if:
- patients with proximal tibial defects requiring either a metal or allograft augment
- inadequate radiographic studies as required by the study protocol
- if they do not receive a total knee arthroplasty, or receive a unicondylar arthroplasty
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Related Publications (5)
Nam D, Weeks KD, Reinhardt KR, Nawabi DH, Cross MB, Mayman DJ. Accelerometer-based, portable navigation vs imageless, large-console computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of radiographic results. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Feb;28(2):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.023. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
PMID: 22704226RESULTNam D, Jerabek SA, Cross MB, Mayman DJ. Cadaveric analysis of an accelerometer-based portable navigation device for distal femoral cutting block alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg. 2012;17(4):205-10. doi: 10.3109/10929088.2012.689335. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
PMID: 22681247RESULTNam D, Nawabi DH, Cross MB, Heyse TJ, Mayman DJ. Accelerometer-based computer navigation for performing the distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Oct;27(9):1717-22. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
PMID: 22440228RESULTNam D, Dy CJ, Cross MB, Kang MN, Mayman DJ. Cadaveric results of an accelerometer based, extramedullary navigation system for the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2012 Oct;19(5):617-21. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.09.008. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
PMID: 22032868RESULTNam D, Jerabek SA, Haughom B, Cross MB, Reinhardt KR, Mayman DJ. Radiographic analysis of a hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec;26(8):1527-33. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
PMID: 21397455RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- David Mayman
- Organization
- Hospital for Special Surgery
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Mayman, MD
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2013
First Posted
February 22, 2013
Study Start
December 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
September 16, 2013
Last Updated
July 11, 2017
Results First Posted
July 11, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07