Alignment Comparison Between TruMatch™ Personalized Solutions and Conventional Total Knee Replacement Instrumentation
Comparison of In Vivo Alignment With TruMatch™ Personalized Solutions Compared to Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Replacement (TKR)
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
4
Brief Summary
This investigation is intended to provide clinical information about alignment using TruMatch™ and to compare the results to a conventional total knee replacement. TruMatch™ will be compared to a historical control study, which compares alignment results of computer aided surgery (CAS) and conventional surgical techniques. The purpose of this investigation is to determine whether TruMatch™ alignment is non-inferior to alignment achieved with conventional instrumentation. This investigation will compare long leg alignment in total knee replacement achieved by the two types of procedures. Radiographic analysis will be performed by the same independent radiographic reviewer as the historical control study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2009
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 21, 2012
CompletedOctober 24, 2023
October 1, 2023
1.4 years
April 1, 2010
March 27, 2012
October 20, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mechanical Axis Alignment(Absolute Value Measured in Degrees)Using 51 Inch Long Leg Films
Limb alignment in TKR is important for accurate implant positioning. It is measured by looking at the mechanical axis of the limb. This axis is an imaginary line that starts at center of the femoral head and ends in the center of the talus. In a knee with normal alignment, this line (axis) passes near the joint center. Before surgery, the planned joint angle is recorded. This study measured the difference between the mechanical axis angle reached after surgery and the planned angle. Subjects with a mechanical alignment within 3 degrees of the planned angle were considered a success.
12 weeks postoperatively (when subject has reached full knee extension)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Compare Intraoperative Time Data During Procedure for Skin-to-skin Time in Minutes
During the Procedure
Tourniquet Time Measured in Minutes During the Procedure for TruMatch and Conventional Instruments
During the Procedure
Tourniquet to 1st Bone Cut Measured in Minutes During the Procedure for TruMatch and Conventional Instruments
During the Procedure
Coronal Alignment Femoral and Tibial
3-months
Sagittal Component Alignment
Collected at Pre-Op, 3 months
Study Arms (2)
TruMatch™ Personalized Solutions
OTHERCruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using TruMatch™ Personalized Solutions
Historical Control
OTHERTotal Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using conventional and CAS surgical techniques without TruMatch™ instrumentation.
Interventions
TruMatch™ Personalized Solutions is the brand name of DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. custom patient instrumentation. TruMatch™ is a pair of custom-made cutting blocks that allow distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts to be made according to a predefined surgical plan. The inner surface of the femoral block is manufactured to match the geometry of the patient's distal femur. The inner surface of the tibial block is manufactured to match the patient's proximal tibia. The geometric data is obtained from a CT scan and a preoperative plan approved by the surgeon.
Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using conventional instruments, not TruMatch™ instrumentation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects meeting all of the following specific criteria will be considered for participation in the study:
- Subject is male or female and between the ages of 18 and 80 years old, inclusive.
- Subject requires a primary total knee replacement and is considered by the Investigator to be suitable for the specific knee prosthesis identified in the protocol.
- Subject has given voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation and has authorized the transfer of his/her information to DePuy.
- Subject has given consent to the transfer of his/her information to DePuy.
- Subject, who, in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator at the time of preoperative planning, are suitable for implantation using TruMatch™ instrumentation and whose surgical plan (patient proposal) is approved. For example, no femoral nails/bone plates that extend into the knee, i.e. within 8cm of joint line; no metal device that could cause CT scatter about the knee and no deformities greater than 15 degrees of fixed varus, valgus, or flexion
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects will be excluded from participation in the trial if they meet any of the following criteria:
- The Subject has, in the opinion of the Investigator, an existing condition that would compromise their participation and follow-up in this study.
- The Subject is a woman who is pregnant or lactating.
- The Subject is a known drug or alcohol abuser or has a psychological disorder that could affect follow-up care or treatment outcomes.
- The Subject has participated in a clinical investigation with an investigational product in the last 3 months.
- The Subject is currently involved in any personal injury litigation, medical-legal or worker's compensations claims.
- The Subject has previously had a prosthetic knee replacement device (any type including unicompartmental, total knee arthroplasty, patellofemoral arthroplasty) of the affected knee or a previous patellectomy.
- The Subject presents ankylosis of the hip joint on the side to be treated or previous ipsilateral UTO/HTO.
- The Subject requires simultaneous bilateral total knee replacements.
- The Subject had a contralateral TKA and that knee was previously entered in the study.
- Subject in whom the surgeon intends to implant a knee prosthesis that is not the cruciate retaining or posterior substituting PFC Sigma total knee arthroplasty.
- Subjects who have inflammatory arthritis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Towson Orthopaedic Associates
Baltimore, Maryland, 21204, United States
Summit Orthopaedics, LTD
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102, United States
OrthoCarolina
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States
Valley Orthopaedic Associates
Renton, Washington, 98055-5791, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sam Himden
- Organization
- DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Saleem Himden, BA
DePuy Orthopaedics
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2010
First Posted
April 21, 2010
Study Start
October 1, 2009
Primary Completion
March 1, 2011
Study Completion
March 1, 2011
Last Updated
October 24, 2023
Results First Posted
May 21, 2012
Record last verified: 2023-10