NCT01108237

Brief Summary

This investigation is intended to provide clinical information about alignment using TruMatch™ and to compare the results to a conventional total knee replacement. TruMatch™ will be compared to a historical control study, which compares alignment results of computer aided surgery (CAS) and conventional surgical techniques. The purpose of this investigation is to determine whether TruMatch™ alignment is non-inferior to alignment achieved with conventional instrumentation. This investigation will compare long leg alignment in total knee replacement achieved by the two types of procedures. Radiographic analysis will be performed by the same independent radiographic reviewer as the historical control study.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
78

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2009

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2009

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 1, 2010

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 21, 2010

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2011

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 21, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

October 24, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

April 1, 2010

Results QC Date

March 27, 2012

Last Update Submit

October 20, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Arthroplasties, Knee ReplacementArthroplasties, Replacement, KneeArthroplasty, Knee ReplacementKnee Replacement ArthroplastiesKnee Replacement ArthroplastyKnee Replacement, TotalReplacement Arthroplasties, KneeReplacement Arthroplasty, KneeReplacement, Total KneeTotal Knee Replacement

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mechanical Axis Alignment(Absolute Value Measured in Degrees)Using 51 Inch Long Leg Films

    Limb alignment in TKR is important for accurate implant positioning. It is measured by looking at the mechanical axis of the limb. This axis is an imaginary line that starts at center of the femoral head and ends in the center of the talus. In a knee with normal alignment, this line (axis) passes near the joint center. Before surgery, the planned joint angle is recorded. This study measured the difference between the mechanical axis angle reached after surgery and the planned angle. Subjects with a mechanical alignment within 3 degrees of the planned angle were considered a success.

    12 weeks postoperatively (when subject has reached full knee extension)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Compare Intraoperative Time Data During Procedure for Skin-to-skin Time in Minutes

    During the Procedure

  • Tourniquet Time Measured in Minutes During the Procedure for TruMatch and Conventional Instruments

    During the Procedure

  • Tourniquet to 1st Bone Cut Measured in Minutes During the Procedure for TruMatch and Conventional Instruments

    During the Procedure

  • Coronal Alignment Femoral and Tibial

    3-months

  • Sagittal Component Alignment

    Collected at Pre-Op, 3 months

Study Arms (2)

TruMatch™ Personalized Solutions

OTHER

Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using TruMatch™ Personalized Solutions

Other: TruMatch™ Personalized Solutions

Historical Control

OTHER

Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using conventional and CAS surgical techniques without TruMatch™ instrumentation.

Device: Total Knee Arthroplasty with Conventional Instrumentation.

Interventions

TruMatch™ Personalized Solutions is the brand name of DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. custom patient instrumentation. TruMatch™ is a pair of custom-made cutting blocks that allow distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts to be made according to a predefined surgical plan. The inner surface of the femoral block is manufactured to match the geometry of the patient's distal femur. The inner surface of the tibial block is manufactured to match the patient's proximal tibia. The geometric data is obtained from a CT scan and a preoperative plan approved by the surgeon.

TruMatch™ Personalized Solutions

Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using conventional instruments, not TruMatch™ instrumentation.

Historical Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects meeting all of the following specific criteria will be considered for participation in the study:
  • Subject is male or female and between the ages of 18 and 80 years old, inclusive.
  • Subject requires a primary total knee replacement and is considered by the Investigator to be suitable for the specific knee prosthesis identified in the protocol.
  • Subject has given voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation and has authorized the transfer of his/her information to DePuy.
  • Subject has given consent to the transfer of his/her information to DePuy.
  • Subject, who, in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator at the time of preoperative planning, are suitable for implantation using TruMatch™ instrumentation and whose surgical plan (patient proposal) is approved. For example, no femoral nails/bone plates that extend into the knee, i.e. within 8cm of joint line; no metal device that could cause CT scatter about the knee and no deformities greater than 15 degrees of fixed varus, valgus, or flexion

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects will be excluded from participation in the trial if they meet any of the following criteria:
  • The Subject has, in the opinion of the Investigator, an existing condition that would compromise their participation and follow-up in this study.
  • The Subject is a woman who is pregnant or lactating.
  • The Subject is a known drug or alcohol abuser or has a psychological disorder that could affect follow-up care or treatment outcomes.
  • The Subject has participated in a clinical investigation with an investigational product in the last 3 months.
  • The Subject is currently involved in any personal injury litigation, medical-legal or worker's compensations claims.
  • The Subject has previously had a prosthetic knee replacement device (any type including unicompartmental, total knee arthroplasty, patellofemoral arthroplasty) of the affected knee or a previous patellectomy.
  • The Subject presents ankylosis of the hip joint on the side to be treated or previous ipsilateral UTO/HTO.
  • The Subject requires simultaneous bilateral total knee replacements.
  • The Subject had a contralateral TKA and that knee was previously entered in the study.
  • Subject in whom the surgeon intends to implant a knee prosthesis that is not the cruciate retaining or posterior substituting PFC Sigma total knee arthroplasty.
  • Subjects who have inflammatory arthritis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Towson Orthopaedic Associates

Baltimore, Maryland, 21204, United States

Location

Summit Orthopaedics, LTD

Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102, United States

Location

OrthoCarolina

Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States

Location

Valley Orthopaedic Associates

Renton, Washington, 98055-5791, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Interventions

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arthroplasty, ReplacementArthroplastyOrthopedic ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativePlastic Surgery ProceduresProsthesis Implantation

Results Point of Contact

Title
Sam Himden
Organization
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Saleem Himden, BA

    DePuy Orthopaedics

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2010

First Posted

April 21, 2010

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion

March 1, 2011

Study Completion

March 1, 2011

Last Updated

October 24, 2023

Results First Posted

May 21, 2012

Record last verified: 2023-10

Locations