NCT01765751

Brief Summary

The purpose of the Manual Cervical Distraction: Measuring Chiropractic Delivery for Neck Pain Clinical Trial is to examine the patient-centered clinical and biomechanical outcomes, doctor treatment delivery, and believability characteristics of a commonly used chiropractic procedure for the treatment of neck- or neck-related arm pain or disability.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 30, 2012

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2013

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 10, 2013

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2013

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 4, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

January 4, 2018

Status Verified

January 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

May 30, 2012

Results QC Date

April 14, 2017

Last Update Submit

January 3, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Cervical painNeck painArm pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Range of Traction Forces

    We will evaluate the clinician's ability to deliver three randomly assigned manual interventions to the cervical spine within specified traction force ranges (\<20 Newtons \[N\], 20-50N, \>50N). The primary outcome of this study is to determine the accuracy and consistency of traction force delivery ranges both between clinicians and within individual clinicians. Traction force ranges (C5 contact level and Occiput contact level) will be measured at each study visit (visits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) for 2 weeks and averaged to calculate final outcome.

    Day 1, 4, 8, 11, 14 (Each Study Visit)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    Change from Baseline to Day 1 (Study Visit 1) and Day 14 (Study Visit 5)

  • Neck Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Change from Baseline, Day 1, 4, 8, 11, 14 (Pre- and Post-Study Visits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)

  • Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-43)

    Change from Baseline to Day 14 (Study Visit 5)

  • Cervical Range of Motion (cROM).

    Change from Day 1 (Study Visit 1) to Day 14 (Study Visit 5)

  • Procedure Believability Questionnaire

    Baseline (BL), Day 1 (Study Visit 1/T1), Day 14 (Study Visit 5/T5)

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Cervical Muscle Electromyographic (EMG) Activity

    Day 8 (Study Visit 3), Day 11 (Study Visit 4)

  • Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Day 14 (Study Visit 5)

Study Arms (3)

Manual Cervical Distraction High Force

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Manual Cervical Distraction forces will be limited to greater than 50N in the high force group. Dosing for this clinical trial is limited to 3 sets of 5 repetitions with a hand contact on one cervical vertebra of highest clinical importance and 3 sets of 5 repetitions with a hand contact on the occiput.

Procedure: Manual Cervical Distraction

Manual Cervical Distraction Medium Force

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Manual Cervical Distraction forces will be limited to between 20N-50N in the medium force group. Dosing for this clinical trial is limited to 3 sets of 5 repetitions with a hand contact on one cervical vertebra of highest clinical importance and 3 sets of 5 repetitions with a hand contact on the occiput.

Procedure: Manual Cervical Distraction

Manual Cervical Distraction Low Force

SHAM COMPARATOR

Manual Cervical Distraction forces will be limited to less than 20N in the low force group. Dosing for this clinical trial is limited to 3 sets of 5 repetitions with a hand contact on one cervical vertebra of highest clinical importance and 3 sets of 5 repetitions with a hand contact on the occiput.

Procedure: Manual Cervical Distraction

Interventions

Manual Cervical Distraction (MCD) is a form of Low Velocity Variable Amplitude Spinal Manipulation (LVVA-SM). MCD procedure is performed with participant lying prone on a load instrumented table with moveable headpiece allowing guided head movement while recumbent. Clinician gently grasps posterior aspect of participant's neck with a broad contact (contact hand) between thumb and index finger at specific vertebral level. With opposite hand, clinician grasps control handle. Using contact hand, clinician exhibits superior traction to maintain a contact at a single vertebral level and ensuring a gentle movement via contact with control handle. Goal is to create a slow rhythmic (1-3 sec) localized distractive movement. In this trial, only axial distraction (Cox protocol 1) will be used.

Manual Cervical Distraction High ForceManual Cervical Distraction Low ForceManual Cervical Distraction Medium Force

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 to 70 years (inclusive).
  • Mechanical neck pain or neck-related upper extremity pain lasting at least 4 weeks duration.
  • Mechanical neck pain or neck-related upper extremity pain classified as Quebec Task Force (QTF) 2-4.
  • Naïve to flexion-distraction manual therapy procedures to cervical area.
  • Average neck pain in the past 24 hours rated between 3 and 7 on a 0-10 Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Phone Screen and Baseline 1 Interview.
  • Signed Informed Consent Document.

You may not qualify if:

  • Doctor of chiropractic or current or former chiropractic student.
  • Average neck pain in past 24 hours rated 0-2 or 8-10 on a 0-10 Pain NRS at Phone Screen and Baseline 1 Interview.
  • Neck pain from other than somatic tissues as determined by history and clinical examination.
  • Surgery to cervical-thoracic area within the past 6 months.
  • Recent fracture in the cervico-thoracic spine or ribs within the past 8 weeks.
  • Injections for pain in neck, shoulders, arms or hands in the past 4 weeks.
  • Neck pain classified as QTF 1, 5-11.
  • Unwillingness to postpone use of all types of manual treatment for neck pain, except those provided in the study for the duration of the study.
  • Inability or unwillingness to comply with study protocols.
  • Bone or joint pathologies representing a contraindication to study procedures.
  • Any single or multisegmental fusion (surgical or congenital) of the 1st through the 7th cervical vertebrae.
  • Other safety concerns as determined by the clinical evaluation/opinion at case review.
  • Unable to tolerate study procedures.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension: systolic blood pressure ≥160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥100 mmHg.
  • Simultaneous clinical management for a health condition that compromises ability to deliver study treatment or assess health status.
  • +10 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research

Davenport, Iowa, 52803, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Gudavalli MR, Vining RD, Salsbury SA, Goertz CM. Training and certification of doctors of chiropractic in delivering manual cervical traction forces: Results of a longitudinal observational study. J Chiropr Educ. 2014 Oct;28(2):130-8. doi: 10.7899/JCE-14-18. Epub 2014 Sep 19.

    PMID: 25237767BACKGROUND
  • Vining RD, Salsbury SA, Pohlman KA. Eligibility determination for clinical trials: development of a case review process at a chiropractic research center. Trials. 2014 Oct 24;15:406. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-406.

    PMID: 25344427BACKGROUND
  • Gudavalli MR, Potluri T, Carandang G, Havey RM, Voronov LI, Cox JM, Rowell RM, Kruse RA, Joachim GC, Patwardhan AG, Henderson CN, Goertz C. Intradiscal Pressure Changes during Manual Cervical Distraction: A Cadaveric Study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:954134. doi: 10.1155/2013/954134. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

    PMID: 24023587BACKGROUND
  • Gudavalli MR, Vining RD, Salsbury SA, Corber LG, Long CR, Patwardhan AG, Goertz CM. Clinician proficiency in delivering manual treatment for neck pain within specified force ranges. Spine J. 2015 Apr 1;15(4):570-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

  • Gudavalli MR, Salsbury SA, Vining RD, Long CR, Corber L, Patwardhan AG, Goertz CM. Development of an attention-touch control for manual cervical distraction: a pilot randomized clinical trial for patients with neck pain. Trials. 2015 Jun 5;16:259. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0770-6.

  • Gudavalli MR, Vining RD, Salsbury SA, Long CR, Patwardhan AG, and Goertz CM. Forces and durations measured during delivery of a manual cervical distraction procedure. Abstract presented at the World Federation of Chiropractic Conference, 2015.

    RESULT

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Maruti R. Gudavalli, PhD
Organization
Palmer College of Chiropractic

Study Officials

  • Maruti R. Gudavalli, PhD

    Palmer College of Chiropractic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2012

First Posted

January 10, 2013

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion

October 1, 2013

Study Completion

October 1, 2013

Last Updated

January 4, 2018

Results First Posted

January 4, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Once the resulting manuscripts have been published, data sets will be provided for public access. Potential investigators can contact one of the Co-PIs to present their hypothesis, study design, instruments and/or data on which to focus, and resources required. Depending upon the needs and desires of the requesting party, the data that are shared may include analytic tables or de-identified or limited data sets that are transmitted to the requesting parties for additional analyses.

Locations