Study Stopped
Slow enrollment
EBMtrialcentral- Comparing Initial Diuretic Therapies Using a Collaborative Network
Creating an Active Collaborative Network of Comparative Effectiveness Researchers: A Randomized Study of Initial Diuretic Therapy for Hypertension.
2 other identifiers
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
- Clinical equipoise exists with respect to the important question, "What is the best initial diuretic for the treatment of Hypertension"? A pragmatic comparative effectiveness research (CER) study comparing Chlorthalidone to Hydrochlorthiazide (HCTZ) could help inform decision making for this common problem.
- The investigators aim to harness both the power of bioinformatics (using web-based data-capture and electronic health records) and of online media (through collaboration) in order to facilitate such a CER in "usual-care" settings. This process may also provide a foundation for testing a wealth of important clinical questions which commonly arise in the delivery of contemporary healthcare and would otherwise be left unanswered.
- To this end the investigators are developing a website, EBMtrialcentral, where eligible physicians can go online and join their collaborative network. Physicians can then enroll eligible patients in this study. These will include under-served urban patients. Clinical information will be entered online (using a secure database housed at Johns Hopkins), patient consent will be obtained electronically and treatment recommendations will be randomly allocated to either 25mg daily of oral HCTZ or 12.5mg daily of oral Chlorthalidone. The investigators aim to increase to 50mg HCTZ and 25mg Chlorthalidone over 8 weeks and compare their effects on BP measured with a 24 hour monitor.
- The investigators' primary hypothesis is that non-blinded, random, parallel allocation of 12.5mg daily Chlorthalidone (titrated to 25mg at 4 weeks) will demonstrate a clinically meaningful ≥5mmHg improvement in BP control (as measured by change in BP from baseline using 24hr ABPM) compared to 25mg daily HCTZ (titrated to 50mg at 4 weeks) in newly hypertensive patients followed in a usual-care clinic setting over 8 weeks. They will also analyze differences in side-effects or safety (serum electrolytes) between these two medications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Aug 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2018
CompletedAugust 18, 2017
August 1, 2017
10 months
December 10, 2012
August 15, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean systolic 24 Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Subjective Medication Side Effects
4 and 8 weeks
Other Outcomes (3)
Serum Potassium
4 and 8 weeks
Serum Magnesium
4 and 8 weeks
Office Systolic BP assessment
4 and 8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Chlorthalidone
ACTIVE COMPARATOR25mg daily orally for 8 weeks
Hydrochlorothiazide
ACTIVE COMPARATOR50mg daily orally for 8 weeks
Interventions
Initial dose of 12.5mg daily Chlorthalidone (force titrated to 25mg at 4 weeks)
Initial dose 25mg daily HCTZ (force titrated to 50mg at 4 weeks)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women are eligible if they have hypertension, are not receiving antihypertensive medications, and have average office BP values within the last 6 months ≥140/90 mmHg.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven P Schulman, MD
Johns Hopkins University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2012
First Posted
December 12, 2012
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2018
Last Updated
August 18, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08