Study to Assess Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Who Are Administered VEGF Trap-Eye (Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection)
RE-VIEW
An Open-Label Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Intravitreal Administration of VEGF Trap-Eye (Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection) in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
1 other identifier
interventional
154
1 country
49
Brief Summary
This is a phase 4, open-label, single arm, multicenter, clinical study in patients with neovascular AMD designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) administered over 2 years , and to provide clinical information from the first year in the trial evaluating the adverse effects, if any, on the corneal endothelium following administration of IAI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Nov 2012
Typical duration for phase_4
49 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 22, 2017
CompletedDecember 22, 2017
November 1, 2017
2.8 years
November 2, 2012
September 11, 2017
November 21, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score From Baseline to Week 100 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Visual function of the study eye was assessed at a distance of 4 meters at every study visit using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score. A higher score represents better vision. LOCF approach was used if any ETDRS letter score was missed after start of treatment, but baseline data were not carried forward. No formal statistical analyses were performed.
Baseline to Week 100
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Percentage of Participants Whose Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Status Was "Dry" at Week 52 and at Week 100 (LOCF)
Baseline to Week 100
Percentage of Participants Who Gained ≥15 ETDRS Letters Compared With Baseline at Week 52 and Week 100 (LOCF)
At week 52 and At week 100
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score Through Week 52 (LOCF)
Baseline to Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Gained ≥0, ≥5, ≥10, or ≥30 Letters From Baseline in BCVA Through Week 100 (LOCF)
Baseline to Week 100
Percentage of Patients Who Lost >0, ≥5, ≥10, or ≥15 Letters From Baseline in BCVA Through Week 100 (LOCF)
Baseline to Week 100
Other Outcomes (1)
Percent Change From Baseline in Corneal Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) at Week 24 and Week 52 in the Study Eye and the Fellow Eye - Endothelial Cell Density Evaluable Set (EES)
At week 24 and At week 52
Study Arms (1)
Open label IAI
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men or women great than or equal to 50 years of age with unilateral neovascular AMD
- BCVA ETDRS letter score of 73 to 24 (20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye
- Active primary subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesions secondary to AMD, including juxtafoveal lesions that affect the fovea as evidenced by FA in the study eye
- The CNV area must be at least 50% of total lesion size
- Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures
- Provide signed informed consent
- Provide signed Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization
You may not qualify if:
- Neovascular AMD in the fellow eye
- Corneal endothelial measures as judged by an independent reading center
- Any prior use of intraocular anti-VEGF treatment for neovascular AMD in either eye
- Structural damage to the center of the macula in the study eye that is likely to preclude improvement in BCVA following the resolution of macular edema
- History of cataract surgery, or other intraocular surgery in either eye, within 1 year of screening
- History of cataract surgery, or other intraocular surgery in either eye, within 1 year of screening, or yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) Capsulotomy within 3 months of screening
- Contact lens wear in either eye within 6 months of screening
- History of angle closure glaucoma in either eye
- Intraocular laser therapy including selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT), YAG, prophylactic peripheral iridotomy (PI) in either eye within 1 year of screening, or YAG Capsulotomy within 3 months of screening
- History of cataract surgery requiring an anterior chamber intraocular lens implant at any time in either eye
- Any prior ocular trauma (blunt or penetrating) in either eye
- Embedded corneal foreign body in either eye
- Evidence of infectious blepharitis, keratitis, scleritis, or conjunctivitis in either eye
- Ocular media of insufficient quality to obtain fundus and OCT images in the study eye
- Any prior ocular inflammation/infection in either eye within 3 months of the screening visit
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (49)
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Oakland, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Palm Desert, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Sacramento, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Santa Ana, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Westlake Village, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Golden, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Boynton Beach, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Pensacola, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Plantation, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Winter Haven, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Augusta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Oak Park, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
New Albany, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Wichita, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Jackson, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Unknown Facility
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States
Unknown Facility
Bloomfield, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Lawrenceville, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Northfield, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Rochester, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Asheville, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Salem, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Kingston, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Florence, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Ladson, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
West Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Arlington, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Seattle, Washington, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Trial Administrator
- Organization
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Trial Management
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2012
First Posted
November 6, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 22, 2017
Results First Posted
December 22, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11