Study Stopped
PI no longer at University of Minnesota
Comparison of "Wet Suction" Technique to Contemporary "Dry Suction" Technique Using a 22 Gauge Needle for EUS FNA
1 other identifier
observational
128
1 country
2
Brief Summary
ROLE OF SUCTION IN EUS-FNA: Current suction technique involves suctioning the aspirate into the needle that has an air column. The needle is not flushed with any liquid prior to passing into the desired solid lesion. Suction is applied when the needle is within the lesion leading to aspiration of tissue into the needle. This is the standard technique and some have done with and without the stylet. There are some data that favor non use of a stylet. WET SCTION TECHNIQUE: Wet suction technique involves flushing the needle with 1-2 cc of saline to replace the column of air with saline. The needle is now passed into the desired lesion. Suction is applied at maximal strength and needle moved back and forth within the lesion to obtain as aspirate. Drops of saline can be seen moving into the suction syringe as the aspirate moves into the needle. Needle is now withdrawn and aspirate delivered on to a slide by using a stylet and or flushing air into the needle with a syringe. HYPOTHESIS The effect of suction for the purpose of aspirating cells and / or tissue during fine needle biopsy may be significantly improved by filling the column of the needle with a less compressible fluid. The volume of vacuum being pulled may be negatively impacted by the expansion of air within the needle. Replacing the air with sterile saline may thus improve the suction transferred to the needle tip by ensuring that the full volume of the vacuum syringe is transferred to the distal tip of the needle. This effect would be most pronounced in larger gauge needles which would have a larger internal volume. An additional benefit of filling the needle with saline prior to aspiration is the speed of the pressure transfer. The theory is that the air in the needle may absorb some of the force of the sudden application of vacuum. A column of saline in the needle may increase the velocity of the pressure transfer providing more tissue and less blood.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2012
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 2, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2014
CompletedNovember 1, 2019
October 1, 2019
1.9 years
October 25, 2012
October 30, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of cellularity obtained by wet suction and conventional dry suction technique
The aspirate will be evaluated by a pathologist, blinded to the suction technique, to reach a cytological diagnosis. The pathologist will determine the quality of aspirate, grading it based on cellularity.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Diagnostic ability of final cytopathology at cell-block
6 months
Presence of blood and other contaminants.
6 months
Study Arms (1)
EUS FNA
Patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasound for solid mass lesions with a 22 G needle at University of Minnesota Medical center and Aurora St.Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI
Eligibility Criteria
All patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasound examination of solid lesions in the mediastinum, pancreas and abdomen requiring fine needle aspiration are recruited.
You may qualify if:
- Solid mass lesions under going endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)
You may not qualify if:
- Coagulopathy
- Age below 18 years
- Cystic or solid-cystic lesions.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
University of Minnesota Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Aurora St.Luke's Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
RAJEEV ATTAM, MD
University of Minnesota
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2012
First Posted
November 2, 2012
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 1, 2014
Study Completion
September 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 1, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10