A Comparison of Methods for Assisting Needle Angle Selection During Image-guided Tissue Biopsy
2 other identifiers
interventional
17
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: \- Currently, standard procedures for biopsies that are guided by computed tomography (CT) imaging involve CT scans and a computer program to plan and illustrate where the physician will place the needle to obtain the required cells or tissue. Inserting the biopsy needle at the planned angle is not an easy task, because the appropriate angle of insertion must be estimated based on prior experience. Researchers are studying experimental techniques that might provide better guidance about the right angle to insert the biopsy needle and thereby improve the collection of the appropriate biopsy cells or tissue. Objectives: \- To evaluate the effectiveness of two biopsy needle guidance methods in CT-guided tissue biopsy. Eligibility: \- Individuals at least 18 years of age who are scheduled to have CT-guided tissue biopsy. Design:
- Participants will have a tissue biopsy guided by CT scans and either a laser system or a plastic block to illustrate the appropriate angle of insertion. The skin will be numbed with anesthetic to minimize discomfort during the procedure.
- Before inserting the biopsy needle, the study physician will hold the needle in place so that a Food and Drug Administration-approved medical GPS (electromagnetic tracking) system can measure the needle angle as it enters the tissue.
- After the needle angle data has been collected, researchers will proceed with the actual biopsy procedure as it would normally occur, using standard methods.
- No additional treatment will be provided as part of this protocol.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Mar 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 8, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 11, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 20, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 16, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 16, 2016
CompletedSeptember 22, 2025
September 1, 2025
4.7 years
October 8, 2010
September 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Difference between L-NASS and standard method
Data is currently undergoing analysis
Completion of study
Differnce between B-NASS and standard method
Data is currently undergoing analysis
Completion of study
The difference between MD-NASS and standard method
Data is currently undergoing analysis
Completion of study
Study Arms (3)
B-NASS
EXPERIMENTALBlock assisted needle angle selection system
L-NASS
EXPERIMENTALlaser assisted needle angle selection system
MD-NASS
EXPERIMENTALmobile-device assisted needle angle selection system
Interventions
The tool for measuring the needle angles will be an FDA-approved EM tracking system. At no time will the needle enter tissue that it wouldn t have otherwise entered as neither system will be used to perform the biopsies at this time.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must fulfill all of the following criteria to be eligible for study admission:
- All patients must be undergoing a CT-guided biopsy.
- Age greater than 18 years.
- No serious concurrent medical illness that would preclude the patient from making a rational informed decision on participation.
- The ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent form, and to comply with the protocol. If in question, an ethics consult will be obtained.
- Ability to follow breathing instructions like holding breath (if procedure is to be performed without general anesthesia).
- Patients must be actively enrolled on an NIH protocol and be scheduled for a CT-guided biopsy.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with an altered mental status that precludes understanding or consenting for the biopsy procedure will be excluded from this study.
- Patients unlikely to be able to hold reasonably still on a procedure table for the length of the procedure.
- Patients with any known allergy to plastics or polymers (since the Ultem -polymer could theoretically induce a rash in these patients, even though it is hypoallergenic).
- Inability to follow breathing instructions, if without general anesthesia.
- Patients with pacemakers or automatic implantable cardiac defibrillators.
- Gross body weight above the CT table limit (450 pounds).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Related Publications (3)
Miaux Y, Guermazi A, Gossot D, Bourrier P, Angoulvant D, Khairoune A, Turki C, Bouche E. Laser guidance system for CT-guided procedures. Radiology. 1995 Jan;194(1):282-4. doi: 10.1148/radiology.194.1.7997570.
PMID: 7997570BACKGROUNDPereles FS, Baker M, Baldwin R, Krupinski E, Unger EC. Accuracy of CT biopsy: laser guidance versus conventional freehand techniques. Acad Radiol. 1998 Nov;5(11):766-70. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(98)80260-2.
PMID: 9809074BACKGROUNDJacobi V, Thalhammer A, Kirchner J. Value of a laser guidance system for CT interventions: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 1999;9(1):137-40. doi: 10.1007/s003300050644.
PMID: 9933397BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bradford J Wood, M.D.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2010
First Posted
October 11, 2010
Study Start
March 20, 2012
Primary Completion
November 16, 2016
Study Completion
November 16, 2016
Last Updated
September 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09