Comparison of Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Stents With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Stents
EVERBIOII
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of everolimus- and biolimus-bluting stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold stents. The null hypothesis to be rejected is that there is no significant difference with regard to lumen late loss at 9 months and a clinical end point of death, myocardial infarction and TVR at 12 months between everolimus-eluting and biolimus-eluting stents and everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold stents.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease
Started Oct 2012
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedOctober 22, 2021
May 1, 2014
1.2 years
October 18, 2012
October 14, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Lumen Late Loss
as assessed by quantitative coronary angiogram
9 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Device-oriented major adverse cardiac events
6 months, 1, 2, 5 years
Patient-oriented major adverse cardiac events
6 months, 1, 2, 5 years
Other Outcomes (2)
Stent thrombosis
up to 5 years
Periprocedural Complications (occurring <48 hours after the Intervention)
Periprocedural
Study Arms (3)
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold stents
ACTIVE COMPARATOREverolimus-eluting stent
ACTIVE COMPARATORBiolimus-eluting stent
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- elective PCI
- ability and willingness to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the previous 48 hours
- moderate to severe renal failure (defined as creatinine clearance of 30-60 ml/min and \<30ml/min respectively)
- known or presumed hypersensitivity to heparin, antiplatelet drugs and hypersensitivity to contrast dye incontrollable with premedication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fribourg Cantonal Hospital
Fribourg, 1708, Switzerland
Related Publications (4)
Arroyo D, Togni M, Puricel S, Gerard B, Sonja L, Corpataux N, Villeneuve H, Boute E, Stauffer JC, Goy JJ, Cook S. Comparison of everolimus-eluting and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: study protocol of the randomized controlled EVERBIO II trial. Trials. 2014 Jan 7;15:9. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-9.
PMID: 24398143RESULTBengueddache S, Cook M, Lehmann S, Arroyo D, Togni M, Puricel S, Cook S. Ten-year clinical outcomes of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents vs. everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds-insights from the EVERBIO-2 trial. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 10;11:1426348. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1426348. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39323753DERIVEDKallinikou Z, Arroyo D, Togni M, Lehman S, Corpataux N, Cook M, Muller O, Baeriswyl G, Stauffer JC, Goy JJ, Puricel SG, Cook S. Vascular response to everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents versus everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds--an optical coherence tomography substudy of the EVERBIO II trial. Swiss Med Wkly. 2016 Jan 14;146:w14274. doi: 10.4414/smw.2016.14274. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 26766027DERIVEDPuricel S, Arroyo D, Corpataux N, Baeriswyl G, Lehmann S, Kallinikou Z, Muller O, Allard L, Stauffer JC, Togni M, Goy JJ, Cook S. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 3;65(8):791-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.017.
PMID: 25720622DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Stéphane Cook, Professor
University of Freiburg
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mario Togni, Professor
University of Freiburg
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Serban Puricel, MD
University of Freiburg
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2012
First Posted
October 22, 2012
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
October 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2014-05