NCT01711931

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of everolimus- and biolimus-bluting stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold stents. The null hypothesis to be rejected is that there is no significant difference with regard to lumen late loss at 9 months and a clinical end point of death, myocardial infarction and TVR at 12 months between everolimus-eluting and biolimus-eluting stents and everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold stents.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
240

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2012

Shorter than P25 for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2012

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 18, 2012

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 22, 2012

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

October 22, 2021

Status Verified

May 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

October 18, 2012

Last Update Submit

October 14, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

percutaneous coronary interventionbioresorbable vascular scaffold stentseverolimusbiolimus

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Lumen Late Loss

    as assessed by quantitative coronary angiogram

    9 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Device-oriented major adverse cardiac events

    6 months, 1, 2, 5 years

  • Patient-oriented major adverse cardiac events

    6 months, 1, 2, 5 years

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Stent thrombosis

    up to 5 years

  • Periprocedural Complications (occurring <48 hours after the Intervention)

    Periprocedural

Study Arms (3)

Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold stents

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: Implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold stent

Everolimus-eluting stent

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: Implantation of everolimus-eluting stents

Biolimus-eluting stent

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: Implantation of biolimus-eluting stents

Interventions

Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold stents
Everolimus-eluting stent
Biolimus-eluting stent

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • elective PCI
  • ability and willingness to provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the previous 48 hours
  • moderate to severe renal failure (defined as creatinine clearance of 30-60 ml/min and \<30ml/min respectively)
  • known or presumed hypersensitivity to heparin, antiplatelet drugs and hypersensitivity to contrast dye incontrollable with premedication

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fribourg Cantonal Hospital

Fribourg, 1708, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Arroyo D, Togni M, Puricel S, Gerard B, Sonja L, Corpataux N, Villeneuve H, Boute E, Stauffer JC, Goy JJ, Cook S. Comparison of everolimus-eluting and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: study protocol of the randomized controlled EVERBIO II trial. Trials. 2014 Jan 7;15:9. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-9.

  • Bengueddache S, Cook M, Lehmann S, Arroyo D, Togni M, Puricel S, Cook S. Ten-year clinical outcomes of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents vs. everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds-insights from the EVERBIO-2 trial. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 10;11:1426348. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1426348. eCollection 2024.

  • Kallinikou Z, Arroyo D, Togni M, Lehman S, Corpataux N, Cook M, Muller O, Baeriswyl G, Stauffer JC, Goy JJ, Puricel SG, Cook S. Vascular response to everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents versus everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds--an optical coherence tomography substudy of the EVERBIO II trial. Swiss Med Wkly. 2016 Jan 14;146:w14274. doi: 10.4414/smw.2016.14274. eCollection 2016.

  • Puricel S, Arroyo D, Corpataux N, Baeriswyl G, Lehmann S, Kallinikou Z, Muller O, Allard L, Stauffer JC, Togni M, Goy JJ, Cook S. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 3;65(8):791-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.017.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Stéphane Cook, Professor

    University of Freiburg

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Mario Togni, Professor

    University of Freiburg

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Serban Puricel, MD

    University of Freiburg

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2012

First Posted

October 22, 2012

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion

December 1, 2013

Study Completion

December 1, 2013

Last Updated

October 22, 2021

Record last verified: 2014-05

Locations