Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting Versus Everolimus-eluting Stent Trial
RESET
1 other identifier
interventional
3,206
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the newly-approved everolimus-eluting stent is not inferior to the sirolimus-eluting stent in terms of the rate of target-lesion revascularization at 1-year and death or myocardial infarction at 3-year after stent implantation in the real world clinical practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease
Started Feb 2010
Typical duration for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedDecember 10, 2015
December 1, 2015
4.1 years
December 16, 2009
December 9, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
target-lesion revascularization
1-year
all-cause death or myocardial infarction
3-year
Secondary Outcomes (15)
all-cause death
3-year
cardiac death
3-year
myocardial infarction
3-year
stent thrombosis (Academic Research Consortium definition)
3-year
ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes excluding transient ischemic attacks and secondary causes
3-year
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Everolimus-eluting stent
EXPERIMENTALSirolimus-eluting stent
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stents
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takeshi Morimotolead
Study Sites (1)
Division of Cardiology, Kyoto University Hospital
Kyoto, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
Related Publications (6)
Shiomi H, Kozuma K, Morimoto T, Kadota K, Tanabe K, Morino Y, Akasaka T, Abe M, Takeji Y, Suwa S, Ito Y, Kobayashi M, Dai K, Nakao K, Tarutani Y, Taniguchi R, Nishikawa H, Yamamoto Y, Nakagawa Y, Ando K, Kobayashi K, Kawai K, Hibi K, Kimura T; RESET Investigators. 7-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Trial Comparing the First-Generation Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus the New-Generation Everolimus-Eluting Stent: The RESET Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 8;12(7):637-647. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.234.
PMID: 30947938DERIVEDIto S, Watanabe H, Morimoto T, Yoshikawa Y, Shiomi H, Shizuta S, Ono K, Yamaji K, Soga Y, Hyodo M, Shirai S, Ando K, Horiuchi H, Kimura T. Impact of Baseline Thrombocytopenia on Bleeding and Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jun 1;121(11):1304-1314. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
PMID: 29628128DERIVEDWatanabe H, Morimoto T, Shiomi H, Yoshikawa Y, Kato T, Saito N, Shizuta S, Ono K, Yamaji K, Ando K, Kaji S, Furukawa Y, Akao M, Ishikawa T, Tamura T, Yamamoto Y, Muramatsu T, Suwa S, Nakagawa Y, Kadota K, Takatsu Y, Nishikawa H, Hiasa Y, Hayashi Y, Miyazaki S, Kimura T. Mortality impact of post-discharge myocardial infarction size after percutaneous coronary intervention: a patient-level pooled analysis from the 4 large-scale Japanese studies. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 Jan;34(1):47-58. doi: 10.1007/s12928-018-0517-x. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
PMID: 29508236DERIVEDShiomi H, Kozuma K, Morimoto T, Igarashi K, Kadota K, Tanabe K, Morino Y, Akasaka T, Abe M, Suwa S, Muramatsu T, Kobayashi M, Dai K, Nakao K, Uematsu M, Tarutani Y, Fujii K, Simonton CA, Kimura T; RESET Investigators. Long-term clinical outcomes after everolimus- and sirolimus-eluting coronary stent implantation: final 3-year follow-up of the Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun;7(3):343-54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.001322. Epub 2014 May 6.
PMID: 24803436DERIVEDKozuma K, Kimura T, Kadota K, Suwa S, Kimura K, Iwabuchi M, Kawai K, Miyazawa A, Kawamura M, Nakao K, Asano R, Yamamoto T, Suzuki N, Aoki J, Kyono H, Nakazawa G, Tanabe K, Morino Y, Igarashi K. Angiographic findings of everolimus-eluting as compared to sirolimus-eluting stents: angiographic sub-study from the Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial (RESET). Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2013 Oct;28(4):344-51. doi: 10.1007/s12928-013-0179-7. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
PMID: 23608784DERIVEDKimura T, Morimoto T, Natsuaki M, Shiomi H, Igarashi K, Kadota K, Tanabe K, Morino Y, Akasaka T, Takatsu Y, Nishikawa H, Yamamoto Y, Nakagawa Y, Hayashi Y, Iwabuchi M, Umeda H, Kawai K, Okada H, Kimura K, Simonton CA, Kozuma K; RESET Investigators. Comparison of everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents: 1-year outcomes from the Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting Versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial (RESET). Circulation. 2012 Sep 4;126(10):1225-36. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.104059. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
PMID: 22824435DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Takeshi Kimura, MD
Professor of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2009
First Posted
December 18, 2009
Study Start
February 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 10, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12