U0289-401: Eight Week, Split-face, Study to Determine and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY™ II to PROACTIV™
U0289-401: An Evaluator Blinded, 8 Week, Split-Face Study to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of MAXCLARITY II and PROACTIV in Subjects With Acne
1 other identifier
interventional
20
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
One of the main success factors in acne therapy is user compliance with treatment, product cost, availability and ease of use. Poor compliance may translate into decreased efficacy (either not improving symptoms well enough or not improving symptoms fast enough), tolerability issues or adverse effects (eg, erythema, dryness, or peeling of the skin), a lack of understanding of the instructions for use, or product cost/availability. Whatever the reason, poor compliance translates to decreased efficacy and increased frustration on the part of the user. The current study will evaluate and compare the efficacy and tolerability of 2 over-the-counter, topical benzoyl peroxide (BPO) product lines in subjects with acne: MAXCLARITY II (2.5% BPO) Foam Cleanser and Foam Treatment and (0.5% Salicylic Acid) Toner Foam compared with PROACTIV (2.5% BPO) Renewing Cleanser and Repairing Lotion and Revitalizing Toner.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Sep 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 25, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 11, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 15, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 20, 2017
CompletedAugust 23, 2017
April 1, 2017
4 months
October 11, 2012
April 4, 2017
July 19, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Percent Change in Inflammatory Lesion (IL), Non-inflammatory Lesion (NIL), and Total Lesion (TL) Counts From Baseline (BL) (Day 1) to Week (Wk) 8.
This was an efficacy variable. An expert grader evaluated each side of the face (included forehead, cheeks and chin), the left and the right side, for IL (presence of papules and pustules), NIL (presence of open and closed comedones) and the TLs. The mouth, nose, periocular area, nasogenian, and superior and inferior eyelids were excluded. The evaluator was also blinded. BL was defined as Day 1. The percent change was calculated as the value at Wk 8 minus the value at BL.
BL (Day 1) and Wk 8
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Mean Percent Change in IL Count From BL (Day 1) to Wks 1, 2 and 4
BL (Day1) to Wks 1, 2 and 4
Mean Percent Change in NIL Count From BL (Day 1) to Wks 1, 2 and 4
BL (Day 1) to Wks 1, 2 and 4
Mean Percent Change in TL Count From BL (Day 1) to Wks 1, 2 and 4
BL (Day 1) to Wks 1, 2 and 4
Mean Change in Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) From BL (Day 1) to Wks 1, 2, 4 and 8.
BL (Day 1) to Wks 1, 2, 4 and 8
Mean Change in Each of the Evaluator Tolerability Assessments-Erythema
BL (Day 1) to Wks 1, 2, 4 and 8
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
MAXCLARITY II
EXPERIMENTALMaxClarity II (2.5% BPO) Foam Cleanser and Foam Treatment and (0.5% Salicylic Acid) Toner Foam. Available over the counter. Each subject applies both arms (MaxClarity II and Proactiv) simultaneously for the entire duration of the study (8 weeks), each arm to be applied to one side of the face only (split-face study) according to randomization.
PROACTIV
ACTIVE COMPARATORProactiv (2.5% BPO) Renewing Cleanser and Repairing Lotion and Revitalizing Toner. Available over the counter. Each subject applies both arms (MaxClarity II and Proactiv) simultaneously for the entire duration of the study (8 weeks), each arm to be applied to one side of the face only (split-face study) according to randomization.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Capable of understanding and willing to provide signed and dated written voluntary informed consent (and any local or national authorization requirements) before any protocol specific procedures are performed.
- Male or female aged from 16 to 29 years, inclusive, at time of consent. No more than 50% of the subjects at each site can be enrolled under the age of 20.
- Mild facial acne vulgaris, characterized by at least 12 facial inflammatory lesions (papules and pustules) and/or noninflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) on the face.
- Able to complete the study and to comply with study instructions.
- Sexually active females of childbearing potential participating in the study must agree to use a medically acceptable method of contraception while receiving protocol-assigned product. A woman of childbearing potential is defined as one who is biologically capable of becoming pregnant; including perimenopausal women who are less than 2 years from their last menses. Acceptable contraceptive methods include the following:
- Hormonal contraception, including oral, injectable, or implantable methods started at least 2 months prior to screening. If hormonal contraception was started less than 2 months prior to screening, then a form of nonhormonal contraception should be added until the third continuous month of hormonal contraception has been completed.
- Two forms of reliable nonhormonal contraception, to include the use of either an intrauterine device plus a reliable barrier method or 2 reliable barrier methods. Reliable barrier methods include condoms or diaphragms. A cervical cap is also a reliable barrier method, provided that the female subject has never given birth naturally. The combined use of a condom and spermicide constitute 2 forms of acceptable nonhormonal contraception, provided that they are both used properly. The use of spermicide alone and the improper use of condoms are inferior methods of contraception. Subjects with surgical sterilization, including tubal sterilization or partner's vasectomy, must use a form of nonhormonal contraception. A barrier method or sterilization plus spermatocide is acceptable.
- Women who are not currently sexually active must agree to use a medically accepted method of contraception should she become sexually active while participating in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Female who is pregnant, trying to become pregnant, or breast feeding.
- Has active or chronic skin allergies.
- Has a history of acute or chronic disease that might interfere with or increase the risk of study participation.
- Had skin cancer treatment in preceding 12 months.
- Has damaged skin on facial areas (eg, sunburn, tattoo, or scar)
- Had any medical procedure (eg, laser resurfacing, chemical peel, or plastic surgery) on facial areas in preceding 12 months.
- Had any cosmetic procedure (eg, microdermabrasion) on facial areas within 8 weeks of the baseline visit.
- Has any dermatological disorder that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the accurate evaluation of the subject's facial appearance.
- Received any investigational drug or procedure within 28 days of the baseline visit or is scheduled to receive an investigational drug (other than the study products) or procedure during the study.
- Currently using any medication that in the opinion of the investigator may affect the evaluation of the study products or place the subject at undue risk (including but not limited to asthma medications, oral steroids, rifampin, anticonvulsants, and St John's wart).
- Has a history of known or suspected intolerance to any of the ingredients of the study products (ie, benzoyl peroxide).
- Considered unable or unlikely to attend the necessary visits.
- Live in the same household as currently enrolled subjects.
- Employee of the investigator, a contract research organization, or Stiefel Laboratories who is involved in the study, or an immediate family member (partner, offspring, parents, siblings or sibling's offspring) of an employee involved in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 11, 2012
First Posted
October 15, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 25, 2010
Last Updated
August 23, 2017
Results First Posted
June 20, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.