A Phase 4, Single-Blind, Randomized, Study to Compare the Tolerability and Efficacy of 0.1% Tazorac Cream When Used in Combination With Either Duac Gel or Acanya Gel for the Treatment of Facial Acne Vulgaris
C0000-411
1 other identifier
interventional
40
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
A single-blind (investigator-blinded), randomized, parallel group, single center study to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of combination therapy with Duac Gel / 0.1% Tazorac Cream and Acanya Gel / 0.1% Tazorac Cream for the treatment of facial acne vulgaris.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Oct 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 19, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 23, 2012
CompletedJanuary 30, 2017
December 1, 2016
6 months
November 19, 2009
January 19, 2012
December 1, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Mean Change From Baseline in Erythema at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean change from baseline was calculated as the average value at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 minus the value at baseline. Erythema (redness of the skin, due to increased blood flow in the capillaries in the lower layers of theh skin) was assessed by the investigator based on a 6-point scale: 0=none, which is normal; 1=trace, which is mild and localized; 2=mild, which is mild and diffuse; 3=moderate, which is moderate and diffuse; 4=marked, which is moderate and dense; 5=severe, which is prominent and dense.
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Dryness at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean change from baseline was calculated as the average value at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 minus the value at baseline. Dryness was assessed by the investigator based on a 6-point scale: 0=none, which is normal; 1=trace, which is mild and localized; 2=mild, which is mild and diffuse; 3=moderate, which is moderate and diffuse; 4=marked, which is moderate and dense; 5=severe, which is prominent and dense.
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Peeling at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean change from baseline was calculated as the average value at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 minus the value at baseline. Peeling was assessed by the investigator based on a 6-point scale: 0=none, which is normal; 1=trace, which is mild and localized; 2=mild, which is mild and diffuse; 3=moderate, which is moderate and diffuse; 4=marked, which is moderate and dense; 5=severe, which is prominent and dense.
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Burning/Stinging at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean change from baseline was calculated as the average value at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 minus the value at baseline. Burning/stinging was assessed by participants based on a 6-point scale: 0=none: normal, no discomfort; 1=trace: awareness, no discomfort, no intervention required; 2=mild: noticeable discomfort, intermittent awareness; 3=moderate: noticeable discomfort, continuous awareness; 4=marked: definite discomfort, continuous awareness, interferes occasionally with normal daily activities; 5=severe: definite continuous discomfort, interferes with normal daily activities.
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Itching at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean change from baseline was calculated as the average value at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 minus the value at baseline. Itching was assessed by participants based on a 6-point scale: 0=none: normal, no discomfort; 1=trace: awareness, no discomfort, no intervention required; 2=mild: noticeable discomfort, intermittent awareness; 3=moderate: noticeable discomfort, continuous awareness; 4=marked: definite discomfort, continuous awareness, interferes occasionally with normal daily activities; 5=severe: definite continuous discomfort, interferes with normal daily activities.
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Oiliness at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean change from baseline was calculated as the average value at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 minus the value at baseline. Oiliness was assessed by participants based on a 6-point scale: 0=none: normal, no discomfort; 1=trace: awareness, no discomfort, no intervention required; 2=mild: noticeable discomfort, intermittent awareness; 3=moderate: noticeable discomfort, continuous awareness; 4=marked: definite discomfort, continuous awareness, interferes occasionally with normal daily activities; 5=severe: definite continuous discomfort, interferes with normal daily activities.
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Skin Overall Comfort at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean change from baseline was calculated as the average value at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 minus the value at baseline. Skin comfort was assessed by participants based on 5-point scale: +2, very comfortable; +1, comfortable; 0, neutral; -1, somewhat uncomfortable; or -2, uncomfortable.
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Number of Participants With at Least a Two-grade Improvement in ISGA Score From Baseline to Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Count at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline for the Global Score of the Participant-completed Skindex-29 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline for the Symptomatic Score of the Participant-completed Skindex-29 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Duac & taz
ACTIVE COMPARATORClindamycin 1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 5% and 0.1% tazarotene
Acanya & taz
ACTIVE COMPARATORclindamycin phosphate 1.2%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% and 0.1% tazarotene
Interventions
Clindamycin 1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 5% and 0.1% tazarotene
clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% and 0.1% tazarotene
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Documented diagnosis of acne vulgaris.
- Lesion count: 20 to 50 inflammatory (papules and pustules) and 30 to 100 noninflammatory (open and closed - comedones) facial lesions excluding nose, and ≤ 1 small nodular lesion. Cystic lesions are not allowed at baseline.
- Investigator Static Global Assessment of 3 or 4 at Baseline.
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically relevant finding at baseline or medical history of severe systemic diseases or diseases of the facial skin, other than acne vulgaris.
- Subjects with cystic acne lesions.
- Facial hair that may obscure the accurate assessment of acne grade.
- History or presence of regional enteritis or inflammatory bowel disease (eg, ulcerative colitis, pseudomembranous colitis, chronic diarrhea, celiac disease or a history of antibiotic-associated colitis) or similar symptoms.
- Concurrent use of medications known to be photosensitizers (eg, thiazides, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, phenothiazines, and sulfonamides) because of the possibility of increased phototoxicity.
- Concomitant use of neuromuscular blocking agents. Clindamycin has neuromuscular blocking activities, which may enhance the action of other neuromuscular blocking agents.
- Use of topical anti-acne medications (eg, benzoyl peroxide, retinoids, azelaic acid, resorcinol, salicylates, sulfacetamide sodium and derivatives, and glycolic acid) within the past 2 weeks.
- Use of topical antibiotics on the face within the past 2 weeks or systemic antibiotics within the past 4 weeks.
- Use of topical corticosteroids on the face or systemic corticosteroids within the past 2 to 4 weeks, respectively. Use of inhaled, intra-articular or intra lesional (other than for facial acne lesions) steroids is acceptable.
- Use of systemic retinoids, such as Isotretinoin, within the past 6 months.
- Concomitant use of the following types of facial products: astringents, toners, abradants, hair removal wax, facials, peels containing glycolic or other acids, masks, washes or soaps containing benzoyl peroxide, sulfacetamide sodium or salicylic acid, non-mild facial cleansers, or moisturizers that contain retinol, salicylic acid, or α- or β hydroxy acids.
- Concomitant use of medications that are reported to exacerbate acne, (eg, vitamins such as vitamin D, vitamin A, vitamins B2, B6, B12; haloperidol, halogens such as iodide and bromide, lithium, cyclosporine, psoralen, sirolimus, imatinib, aripiprazole, isoniazid, valproate acid, hydantoin, and phenobarbital) as these may impact efficacy assessments. Iron supplements and folate are acceptable.
- Facial procedures (eg, chemical peel, lasers/lights, photodynamic therapy, microdermabrasion, artificial ultraviolet therapy) performed by an esthetician, beautician, physician, nurse, or other practitioner, within the past 4 weeks.
- Known hypersensitivity or previous allergic reaction to any component(s) or excipient(s) of the study products.
- Use of any investigational medications or treatments within the past 4 weeks.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stiefel, a GSK Companylead
- GlaxoSmithKlinecollaborator
Related Publications (1)
Dhawan SS, Gwazdauskas J. Clindamycin phosphate 1.2%-benzoyl peroxide (5% or 2.5%) plus tazarotene cream 0.1% for the treatment of acne. Cutis. 2013 Feb;91(2):99-104.
PMID: 23513559DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 19, 2009
First Posted
November 20, 2009
Study Start
October 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Study Completion
April 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 30, 2017
Results First Posted
February 23, 2012
Record last verified: 2016-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.