Compare the Tolerance of Clindamycin 1% /Benzoyl Peroxide (BPO) 5% Gel to Clindamycin 1.2%/ BPO 2.5% Topical Medications
Two-week Study to Determine and Compare the Tolerance and Irritation Potential of Duac® Topical Gel (Clindamycin 1% and Benzoyl Peroxide 5%) to ACANYA™ Gel (Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2% and Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5%) Topical Acne Medications
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a single-blind (blinded expert grader) study that will enroll 25-30 healthy volunteers without facial acne. On 1 side of the face, the subject will apply 1 of the 2 test products, clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide 5% or clindamycin phosphate and benzoyl peroxide 2.5% and the other side of the face will remain non-treated to serve as a control.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Aug 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 13, 2012
CompletedMarch 31, 2017
March 1, 2017
1 month
November 17, 2009
July 12, 2010
March 21, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Erythema (Redness)
Compare tolerability of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 5% and clindamycin phosphate and benzoyl peroxide 2.5% using visual assessments by an independent blinded grader. Erythema (redness) was evaluated using the following scale: Erythema Grade Description 0 = None 2 = Mild erythema 4 = Moderate confluent erythema 6 = Marked erythema with some edema 8 = Marked erythema, edema, possible erosion
14 days
Skin Dryness
Visual Dryness was evaluated using the following scale: Grade 0 = None 2 = Slight flaking 4 = Moderate flaking/scaling 6 = Marked scaling / slight fissuring 8 Severe scaling, fissuring
14 days
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Skin Moisture and Hydration
14 days
Changes in the Skin Surface Hydration
14 days
Subject Tolerability - Burning
2 weeks
Subject Tolerability - Stinging
2 weeks
Subject Assessment - Dryness
2 weeks
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Clindamycin and BPO 5% gel
EXPERIMENTALOnce-daily applications, to the randomized side of the face either left or right, of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 5% gel.
Clindamycin phosphate and BPO 2.5% gel
ACTIVE COMPARATOROnce Daily application of clindamycin phosphate and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 2.5% gel.
Interventions
Once-daily applications, to the randomized side of the face either left or right, of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 5% gel.
Once daily application of clindamycin phosphate and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 2.5% gel
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Capable of understanding and willing to provide signed and dated written voluntary informed consent (and any local or national authorization requirements) before any protocol specific procedures are performed.
- Male and female subjects aged from 18 to 45 years at time of consent.
- Is willing to discontinue use of all facial products (other than the cleanser provided and makeup or razor and facial shave product) on the face for the 3 days before their baseline/day 0 visit and use only the provided facial products and their normal makeup or razor and facial shaving product for the duration of the study.
- Is willing to not change brands of makeup or razor and facial shave product during the study.
- Is willing to refrain from using any facial product on the face other than study products and their normal makeup or razor and facial shave product for the duration of the study.
- Able to complete the study and to comply with study instructions.
- Sexually active females of childbearing potential participating in the study must agree to use a medically acceptable method of contraception while receiving protocol-assigned product
You may not qualify if:
- Female subjects who are pregnant, trying to become pregnant, or breast feeding.
- Male subjects that have facial beards (mustache and/or goatee is acceptable).
- Is a Type I diabetic.
- Has active or chronic skin allergies.
- Has a history of acute or chronic disease that might interfere with, or increase the risk of study participation.
- Has participated in other facial studies in the preceding 30 days or other clinical studies in preceding 14 days.
- Had skin cancer treatment in preceding 12 months.
- Has damaged skin on facial areas (eg, from sunburn, tattoos, scars).
- Had any medical procedure (eg, laser resurfacing, chemical peels, plastic surgery) to facial areas in preceding 12 months.
- Had any cosmetic procedure (eg, microdermabrasion, etc.) to facial areas within 8 weeks of the baseline visit.
- Use of topical retinoids or related agents for the treatment of acne or photoaging in the preceding 6 months.
- Any dermatological disorder, which in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with the accurate evaluation of the subject's facial appearance.
- Has known sensitivities or allergies to cosmetics, soaps, fragrances, or any of the ingredients in the test products.
- Is currently going through menopause and experiencing hot flashes.
- Received any investigational drug within 30 days of study day 0 or who are scheduled to receive an investigational drug other than the study product during the study.
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stiefel, a GSK Companylead
- GlaxoSmithKlinecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
cyberDERM
Broomall, Pennsylvania, 19008, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2009
First Posted
November 18, 2009
Study Start
August 1, 2009
Primary Completion
September 1, 2009
Study Completion
September 1, 2009
Last Updated
March 31, 2017
Results First Posted
February 13, 2012
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.