A Safety and Effectiveness Study of PRK Using the ALLEGRETTO WAVE® EYE-Q Excimer Laser System
Prospective Safety and Effectiveness Study of PRK for Myopia With or Without Astigmatism Using the ALLEGRETTO WAVE® EYE-Q Excimer Laser System
1 other identifier
interventional
176
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the ALLEGRETTO WAVE EYE-Q excimer laser system for the reduction of myopia with or without astigmatism in subjects undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 10, 2017
CompletedSeptember 30, 2019
May 1, 2018
2.9 years
September 27, 2012
January 3, 2017
September 26, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Percentage of Eyes Achieving Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or Better at Refractive Stability in Eyes With Best Spectacle-corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA) of 20/20 or Better Preoperatively
Visual acuity, with and without correction, was assessed monocularly using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions . The with-correction assessment was made with the manifest refraction at 4 meters.
Month 6 (post second eye surgery)
Percentage of Eyes Achieving Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Within ± 1.0 D of Zero at Refractive Stability
Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) is calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder. The sphere and cylinder values are from the manifest refraction assessment. The manifest refraction assessment was conducted monocularly with the ETDRS chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions using a phoropter.
Month 6 (post second eye surgery)
Percentage of Eyes Achieving MRSE Within ± 0.5 D of Zero at Refractive Stability
Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) is calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder. The sphere and cylinder values are from the manifest refraction assessment. The manifest refraction assessment was conducted monocularly with the ETDRS chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions using a phoropter.
Month 6 (post second eye surgery)
Percentage of Eyes Achieving Manifest Refractive Cylinder Within ± 1.0 D of Zero at Refractive Stability
Manifest refraction was performed monocularly under photopic lighting conditions using an ETDRS chart at 4 meters. The subject was manually refracted to his/her best correction using a phoropter.
Month 6 (post second eye surgery)
Percentage of Eyes Achieving Manifest Refractive Cylinder Within ± 0.5 D of Zero at Refractive Stability
Manifest refraction was performed monocularly under photopic lighting conditions using an ETDRS chart at 4 meters. The subject was manually refracted to his/her best correction using a phoropter.
Month 6 (post second eye surgery)
Percentage of Eyes That Have a Change of ≤ 1.0 D in MRSE and Manifest Refractive Cylinder Between Consecutive Scheduled Visits
MRSE is calculated as sphere + 1/2 cylinder. The sphere and cylinder values are from the manifest refraction assessment. The manifest refraction assessment was conducted monocularly with the ETDRS chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions using a phoropter.
Up to Month 24 (post second eye surgery)
Cumulative Incidence of Ocular Serious Adverse Events by Eye
Participants were followed for the duration of the study, an expected average of 24 months.
Up to Month 24 (post second eye surgery)
Percentage of Eyes With BSCVA Decrease of ≥ 2 Lines From Baseline at Refractive Stability
Visual acuity with correction was assessed monocularly using the ETDRS chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions . A decrease in 2 lines or more is considered clinically relevant (i.e. worse).
Month 6 (post second eye surgery)
Percentage of Eyes With a BSCVA Worse Than 20/40 (for Eyes With BSCVA of 20/20 or Better Preoperatively) at Refractive Stability
Visual acuity with correction was assessed monocularly using the ETDRS chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions .
Month 6 (post second eye surgery)
Percentage of Eyes With > 2.0 D of Induced Manifest Refractive Cylinder Magnitude, as Compared to Baseline, at Refractive Stability
Manifest refraction was performed monocularly under photopic lighting conditions using an ETDRS chart at 4 meters. The subject was manually refracted to his/her best correction using a phoropter. The cylinder value is from the manifest refraction assessment. The induced manifest refractive cylinder is the change in magnitude of cylinder compared to baseline.
Month 6 (post second eye surgery)
Study Arms (1)
PRK ALLEGRETTO
EXPERIMENTALPhotorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery using the ALLEGRETTO WAVE EYE-Q excimer laser system for myopic wavefront-optimized ablation
Interventions
In this corneal surgical procedure, the outer corneal epithelial layer will be removed, after which the corneal stroma will be reshaped by excimer laser ablation to reduce or eliminate refractive errors.
The ALLEGRETTO WAVE EYE-Q excimer laser system is used for corneal stroma reshaping during PRK surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects desiring refractive correction of myopia up to -6.00 Diopter (D) sphere with or without astigmatism 0 to -3.00 D and up to -6.00 D manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) at the spectacle plane measured by manifest refraction;
- Minimum best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) in the treated eye of 20/25;
- Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) 20/40 or worse in the treated eye;
- Less than 0.75 D spherical equivalent (SE) difference between cycloplegic and manifest refractions;
- Stable refraction (within ± 0.5 D), as determined by MRSE for a minimum of 12 months prior to surgery;
- Demonstrated stable refraction for contact lens wearers, as specified in protocol;
- Signed informed consent document;
- Willing and able to comply with schedule for follow-up visits;
You may not qualify if:
- Females who are pregnant, lactating, or planning a pregnancy during the time course of the study, or have another condition associated with the fluctuation of hormones that could lead to refractive changes;
- Participation in other clinical trials during this study;
- Acute or chronic disease or illness that would increase the operative risk or confound the outcomes of the study;
- Dry eye syndrome as determined by the short questionnaire for dry eye syndrome;
- Systemic medications that may confound the outcome of the study or increase the risk to the subject by affecting wound healing or tissue repair, including, but not limited to steroids, antimetabolites, immune response modifying drugs, etc.;
- Nystagmus or any other condition that would prevent a steady gaze during the PRK treatment or other diagnostic tests;
- Ocular condition that may predispose the subject to future complications;
- Previous intraocular or corneal surgery;
- Subjects who desire to have monovision;
- A known sensitivity to medications used for study procedures, including PRK;
- Presence or history of any condition or finding that makes the subject unsuitable as a candidate for PRK or study participation or may confound the outcome of the study, in the opinion of the Investigator;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Alcon Researchlead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Expert Clinical Project Lead, GCRA, Surgical
- Organization
- Alcon, A Novartis Division
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sr. Clinical Manager, GCRA Surgical
Alcon, a Novartis Company
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2012
First Posted
October 3, 2012
Study Start
August 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2015
Study Completion
July 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 30, 2019
Results First Posted
April 10, 2017
Record last verified: 2018-05