Building Resiliency and Increasing Community Hope
BRICH
2 other identifiers
interventional
168
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to build a scientific evidence base for the training and delivery of a depressive symptoms education program, developed by local community members, called a Resiliency Class (RC). The RC has strong elements of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and is designed to be delivered as a psycho-educational class by non-professionals to improve mood. Depressive symptoms are common, especially in low-income, minority communities. Depressive symptoms that don't meet DSM-IV criteria for Major Depression still carry a significant amount of disability. Interventions that address sub-threshold depressive symptoms have been noted to result in a decreased likelihood of depression and diminished use of mental health services. Few interventions using a health education / health promotion focus are designed to be delivered by non-professionals to address individuals with mild to moderate depressive symptoms in low income, minority communities. This project will take place in the Centinela Valley, which roughly corresponds to Service Planning Area (SPA) 6 or South Los Angeles (SLA). This single-blind, randomized trial will utilize a wait-list control design where half of the participants enrolled in the study will be randomized to the Resiliency Class (7 sessions) and half will go to a wait-list control condition where they will receive 2 case management calls and referrals to social services. We propose to screen 1500 clients to detect about 450 participants with depressive symptoms (endorsed one item on the PHQ-2). We plan to enroll 400 participants, 200 in the resiliency class and 200 in the wait-list control condition. Primary outcomes measures will include depressive symptoms, function, and measures of resiliency. We will assess these measures at baseline and at 3 months after completion of the Resiliency Class or wait-list condition. After the completion of the first round of classes, we will conduct a preliminary analysis of the impact of the resiliency classes versus the wait-list control case management calls on depressive symptoms. If the resiliency classes improve depressive symptoms more than the wait-list control, we will offer wait-list controls access to the resiliency classes and then disseminate the resiliency class through trainings. We hypothesize that the resiliency classes will lead to greater reductions in client depressive symptoms than the wait-list case management calls in the randomized trial of this project.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2012
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 2, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedMay 9, 2017
May 1, 2017
1.4 years
September 26, 2012
May 4, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Depressive symptom count as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire 8
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 8 is a standard measure of depressive symptoms.
Change from Baseline in Depressive Symptoms at 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
mental health related quality of life (MCS-12) from the Short Form 12 item - Health Survey
Baseline, 3 months
Other Outcomes (12)
Client Use of Services
Baseline, 3 month
Current Medication Use
Baseline, 3 month
Satisfaction with Community Services
Baseline, 3 month
- +9 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Resiliency Class
EXPERIMENTALResiliency Classes (study group) Study participant randomized to the Resiliency classes will be offered and assigned a time and date to attend the classes. Each class will have up to 10 participants. Classes will be 90-120 minutes in duration and will be held weekly for six weeks. At the classes, participants will be offered a copy of the Resiliency Class Manual. And at each class, light snacks and refreshments will be offered. The Resiliency Class manual covers the following topics: Session 1 - "What Affects Your Mood and Resilience;" Session 2 - "Pleasant Activities Can Help Improve Your Mood and Make You Resilient;" Session 3 - "What Gets In The Way of Pleasant Activities: Harmful Thoughts and How to Change Them;" Session 4 - "How to Increase Your Resilience Through Support from Others;" Session 5 - "My Personal Resiliency Plan: Goal Setting;" Session 6 - "Celebrate Your Resiliency: Graduation"
Case Management
ACTIVE COMPARATORCase management phone calls (control group) Study participants randomized to the case management phone calls will be told that they will receive two calls over two months by study staff to offer them referrals based on their perceived need for services to local health care, mental health, substance use, social services, child welfare, housing, and food. In addition, study participants in this arm of the study will be told that if the study determines that the resiliency classes are better at improving mood than the case management calls, they will receive a call to invite them to participate in resiliency classes for free at the B-RICH partner agencies.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 or older
- Endorse one item on the PHQ-2
- Able to be contacted by phone
- Able to participate in the six, weekly 90-120 minute sessions of the Resiliency Classes
- English or Spanish speaker
You may not qualify if:
- Under age 18 years
- Endorse no items on PHQ-2 screener
- PHQ-8 score of 15 or greater on the baseline interview
- \) Unable to be contacted by phone 4) Unable to attend the weekly resiliency classes
- Age 18 or older
- Endorse one of the first two items on the PHQ-8: "In the past two weeks, how often have you been bothered by 1) little interest or pleasure in doing things, 2) feeling down depressed or hopeless."
- Able to be contacted by phone (voice or text message), e-mail, or Facebook.
- Able to participate in the seven, weekly 90-120 minute sessions of the Resiliency Classes
- English or Spanish speaker
- Under age 18 years
- PHQ-8 score of 20 or greater on the baseline interview
- PHQ-8 score of 15 or greater and not currently in care and unwilling to get a referral for care
- Currently homeless
- Has a prior diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder
- Has a prior diagnosis of Schizophrenia
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Healthy African American Families
Los Angeles, California, 90008, United States
1st African Presbyterian Church
Los Angeles, California, 90047, United States
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute
Torrance, California, 90509, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bowen Chung, MD
University of California, Los Angeles
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor-in-Residence
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2012
First Posted
October 2, 2012
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 9, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There are no current plans to share a de-identified, individual participant data as a publicly available dataset due to the original funding not including resources to support this activity; however on a case-by-case basis, the PI would consider additional analyses of the data by other investigators.