NCT01696084

Brief Summary

To confirm the efficacy of CPX-351 compared to 7+3 as first line therapy in elderly patients (60-75 yrs) with high risk (secondary) Acute Myeloid Leukemia. The primary efficacy endpoint will be overall survival.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
309

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2012

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
2 countries

43 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 26, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 28, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 13, 2012

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2015

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 2, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

August 10, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

September 26, 2012

Results QC Date

September 3, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 28, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

AMLAcute Myeloid Leukemiahigh risk AMLsecondary AMLAML in elderly

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Overall Survival

    Overall survival was measured from the date of randomization to death from any cause, subjects not known to have died by the last follow-up were censored on the date they were last known to be alive.

    From the date of randomization to death from any cause

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Proportion of Subjects With a Response

    Post Induction

  • Event-free Survival

    From the date of randomization to the date that persistent disease was documented or the date of relapse after CR or death, whichever came first

  • Remission Duration

    From the date of achievement of a remission until the date of relapse or death from any cause

  • Rate of Achieving Morphologic Leukemia-free State

    Day 14

  • Proportion of Subjects Receiving a Stem Cell Transplant

    Post Induction

Study Arms (2)

Arm A (CPX-351)

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects are eligible to receive up to 2 inductions and up to 2 consolidations with CPX-351. The number of inductions and consolidations a subject received depended on response.

Drug: CPX-351

Arm B (7+3)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects are eligible to receive up to 2 inductions and up to 2 consolidations with cytarabine and daunorubicin given as a 7 + 3, or 5 days of continuous infusion of cytarabine and 2 days of daunorubicin (5+2, second induction, consolidation courses) therapy. The number of inductions and consolidations a subject received depended on response.

Drug: 7+3 (cytarabine and daunorubicin)

Interventions

First induction: 100 units/m2 by 90-minute IV infusion on Days 1, 3, 5. Second induction: 100 units/m2 by 90-minute IV infusion on Days 1 and 3. Consolidation therapy: 65 units/m2 by 90-minute IV infusion on Days 1 and 3.

Arm A (CPX-351)

First induction: 7+3 was administered as: cytarabine at a dose of 100 mg/m2/day on Days 1 through 7 by continuous infusion, and daunorubicin at a dose of 60 mg/m2/day on Days 1, 2, and 3. Second induction: 5+2 was administered as: cytarabine at a dose of 100 mg/m2/day on Days 1 through 5 by continuous infusion and daunorubicin at a dose of 60 mg/m2/day on Days 1 and 2. Consolidation therapy: 5+2 was administered as: cytarabine at a dose of 100 mg/m2/day on Days 1 through 5 by continuous infusion, and daunorubicin at a dose of 60 mg/m2/day on Days 1 and 2.

Also known as: cytarabine and daunorubicin
Arm B (7+3)

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Ability to understand and voluntarily give informed consent
  • Age 60-75 years at the time of diagnosis of AML
  • Pathological diagnosis of AML according to WHO criteria (with at least 20% blasts in the peripheral blood or bone marrow)
  • Confirmation of:
  • Therapy related AML: t-AML must have a documented history of prior cytotoxic therapy or ionizing radiotherapy for an unrelated disease
  • AML with a history of myelodysplasia: MDSAML must have bone marrow documentation of prior MDS
  • AML with a history of CMMoL: CMMoLAML must have bone marrow documentation of prior CMMoL
  • De novo AML with karyotypic abnormalities characteristic of MDS: de novoAML must have cytogenetics with abnormalities per WHO.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
  • Laboratory values fulfilling the following:
  • Serum creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dL
  • Serum total bilirubin \< 2.0 mg/dL, patients with Gilbert's Syndrome should contact the medical monitor
  • Serum alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase \< 3 times the ULN Note: If elevated liver enzymes, above the ULN, are related to disease; contact medical monitor to discuss.
  • Cardiac ejection fraction ≥ 50% by echocardiography or MUGA
  • +1 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Except for CMMoL, patients with history of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) (defined as a history of essential thrombocytosis or polycythemia vera, or idiopathic myelofibrosis prior to the diagnosis of AML) or combined MDS/MPN are not eligible.
  • Acute promyelocytic leukemia \[t(15;17)\] or favorable cytogenetics, including t(8;21) or inv16 if known at the time of randomization.
  • Clinical evidence of active CNS leukemia
  • Patients with active (uncontrolled, metastatic) second malignancies are excluded.
  • Prior treatment intended for induction therapy of AML; only hydroxyurea is permitted for control of blood counts. For example, a patient with MDS that changes HMA dose and schedule after the diagnosis of AML is excluded. AML-type therapy, such as cytarabine alone (\>1g/m2/day) or cytarabine plus an anthracycline as well as prior HSCT are also excluded.
  • Administration of any therapy for MDS (conventional or investigational) must be completed by 2 weeks prior to of the first dose of study drug; in the event of rapidly proliferative disease use of hydroxyurea is permitted until 24 hours before the start of study treatment. Toxicities associated with prior MDS therapy must have recovered to grade 1 or less prior to start of treatment.
  • Any major surgery or radiation therapy within four weeks.
  • Patients with prior cumulative anthracycline exposure of greater than 368 mg/m2 daunorubicin (or equivalent).
  • Any serious medical condition, laboratory abnormality or psychiatric illness that would prevent obtaining informed consent
  • Patients with myocardial impairment of any cause (e.g. cardiomyopathy, ischemic heart disease, significant valvular dysfunction, hypertensive heart disease, and congestive heart failure) resulting in heart failure by New York Heart Association Criteria (Class III or IV staging)
  • Active or uncontrolled infection. Patients with an infection receiving treatment (antibiotic, antifungal or antiviral treatment) may be entered into the study but must be afebrile and hemodynamically stable for ≥72 hrs.
  • Current evidence of invasive fungal infection (blood or tissue culture); patients with recent fungal infection must have a subsequent negative cultures to be eligible; known HIV (new testing not required) or evidence of active hepatitis B or C infection (with rising transaminase values)
  • Hypersensitivity to cytarabine, daunorubicin or liposomal products
  • History of Wilson's disease or other copper-metabolism disorder

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (43)

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States

Location

UCLA

Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States

Location

University of CA San Diego

San Diego, California, 92037-0706, United States

Location

Stanford University

Stanford, California, 94305, United States

Location

Yale University

New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States

Location

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States

Location

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center

Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States

Location

Northside Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States

Location

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, 60208, United States

Location

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States

Location

University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States

Location

Franciscan St. Francis Health

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46237, United States

Location

University of Kansas Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States

Location

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States

Location

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

Location

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States

Location

University of Missouri

Columbia, Missouri, 65211, United States

Location

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center

Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States

Location

Hackensack University Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601, United States

Location

North Shore LIJ Health System

Long Island City, New York, United States

Location

Columbia University

New York, New York, 10032, United States

Location

Cornell U, Weill Medical College

New York, New York, 10065, United States

Location

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, 10467, United States

Location

New York Medical College

Valhalla, New York, 10595, United States

Location

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-1651, United States

Location

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States

Location

Wake Forest University Health Services

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States

Location

Providence Portland Medical Center

Portland, Oregon, 97213, United States

Location

Oregon Health and Science University

Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

Location

Fox Chase Cancer Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111, United States

Location

UPMC

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15219, United States

Location

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States

Location

Sarah Cannon Research Institute

Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States

Location

Vanderbilt University

Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States

Location

Baylor Research Insitute

Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States

Location

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, 770303, United States

Location

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Seattle, Washington, 98109, United States

Location

Medical College of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States

Location

University of Alberta Hospital

Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2C8, Canada

Location

British Columbia Cancer Center

Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada

Location

Princess Margaret Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5G2M9, Canada

Location

Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Shimony S, Murdock HM, Keating JH, Tsai HK, Sasi A, Gibson CJ, Faderl S, Wagner A, Dronamraju N, Lin TL, Prebet T, Cortes JE, Uy GL, Lancet JE, Reilly CR, Neuberg DS, Stone RM, Lindsley RC. CPX-351 Selectively Benefits Patients with AML and Myelodysplasia-Related Mutations in the Pivotal Randomized Trial. Blood Adv. 2026 Feb 2:bloodadvances.2025019378. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025019378. Online ahead of print.

  • Cortes JE, Lin TL, Asubonteng K, Faderl S, Lancet JE, Prebet T. Efficacy and safety of CPX-351 versus 7 + 3 chemotherapy by European LeukemiaNet 2017 risk subgroups in older adults with newly diagnosed, high-risk/secondary AML: post hoc analysis of a randomized, phase 3 trial. J Hematol Oncol. 2022 Oct 26;15(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01361-w.

  • Cortes JE, Lin TL, Uy GL, Ryan RJ, Faderl S, Lancet JE. Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis of CPX-351 versus 7 + 3 in older adults with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary AML. J Hematol Oncol. 2021 Jul 13;14(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01119-w.

  • Lancet JE, Uy GL, Newell LF, Lin TL, Ritchie EK, Stuart RK, Strickland SA, Hogge D, Solomon SR, Bixby DL, Kolitz JE, Schiller GJ, Wieduwilt MJ, Ryan DH, Faderl S, Cortes JE. CPX-351 versus 7+3 cytarabine and daunorubicin chemotherapy in older adults with newly diagnosed high-risk or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia: 5-year results of a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2021 Jul;8(7):e481-e491. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00134-4.

  • Lin TL, Rizzieri DA, Ryan DH, Schiller GJ, Kolitz JE, Uy GL, Hogge DE, Solomon SR, Wieduwilt MJ, Ryan RJ, Faderl S, Cortes JE, Lancet JE. Older adults with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary AML who achieved remission with CPX-351: phase 3 post hoc analyses. Blood Adv. 2021 Mar 23;5(6):1719-1728. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003510.

  • Kolitz JE, Strickland SA, Cortes JE, Hogge D, Lancet JE, Goldberg SL, Villa KF, Ryan RJ, Chiarella M, Louie AC, Ritchie EK, Stuart RK. Consolidation outcomes in CPX-351 versus cytarabine/daunorubicin-treated older patients with high-risk/secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Mar;61(3):631-640. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1688320. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

  • Lancet JE, Uy GL, Cortes JE, Newell LF, Lin TL, Ritchie EK, Stuart RK, Strickland SA, Hogge D, Solomon SR, Stone RM, Bixby DL, Kolitz JE, Schiller GJ, Wieduwilt MJ, Ryan DH, Hoering A, Banerjee K, Chiarella M, Louie AC, Medeiros BC. CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin) Liposome for Injection Versus Conventional Cytarabine Plus Daunorubicin in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 10;36(26):2684-2692. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6112. Epub 2018 Jul 19.

  • Stein EM, Tallman MS. Emerging therapeutic drugs for AML. Blood. 2016 Jan 7;127(1):71-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-07-604538. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

Interventions

CPX-351CytarabineDaunorubicin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leukemia, MyeloidLeukemiaNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CytidinePyrimidine NucleosidesPyrimidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsArabinonucleosidesNucleosidesNucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and NucleosidesAnthracyclinesNaphthacenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsPolycyclic CompoundsAminoglycosidesGlycosidesCarbohydrates

Results Point of Contact

Title
Associate Director, Clinical Trial Disclosure & Transparency
Organization
Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2012

First Posted

September 28, 2012

Study Start

December 13, 2012

Primary Completion

December 31, 2015

Study Completion

December 31, 2015

Last Updated

August 10, 2020

Results First Posted

October 2, 2017

Record last verified: 2020-07

Locations