Evaluation of the Precision of the Microperimetry Function of the Spectral OCT/SLO
1 other identifier
observational
32
1 country
3
Brief Summary
To conduct a precision study to assess the microperimetry function of the Spectral OCT/SLO. The study will assess variability across measurements taken by three different operator-device configuration across clinical sites, variability between subjects within a given operator-device configuration, and variability within a subject for a single operator-device configuration.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Oct 2012
Shorter than P25 for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 30, 2015
CompletedMay 10, 2017
April 1, 2017
1 month
September 21, 2012
July 19, 2013
April 3, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Standard Deviation and Mean Test Results of Normal and With Pathology Participants Taken by 3 Different Operator-device Configurations
A precision study was conducted that used 3 devices (each with a different operator). Each device was used to measure 4 normal subjects and 4 subjects with relevant eye pathology, with a total of 24 subject eyes (12 normal, 12 with pathology) measured across all three devices. For each subject, one eye was evaluated using 3 tests with repositioning at the start of each test. Test results were given in decibels which is the unit used in microperimetry testing. Overall mean and standard deviation in decibels were calculated for the two groups: normal and with pathology.
1 Month
Repeatability of Microperimetry Tests in Normal and With Pathology Participants Based on 3 Microperimetry Tests Taken for Each Participant for a Given Operator-device Combination.
A precision study was conducted that used 3 devices (each with a different operator). Each device was used to measure 4 normal subjects and 4 subjects with relevant eye pathology, with a total of 24 subject eyes (12 normal, 12 with pathology) measured across all three devices. Test results were given in decibels as that is the standard measurement in microperimetry testing. For each subject, one eye was evaluated using 3 microperimetry tests with repositioning at the start of each test. Overall Repeatability SD and Repeatability SD Limit were calculated for the two groups: normal and with pathology.
1 Month
Study Arms (2)
No Retinal Disease
Retinal Disease
Eligibility Criteria
Twenty-four subjects, 12 without retinal disease (Cohort 1) and 12 with retinal disease (Cohort 2) will be recruited. Any subjects that do not comply with or complete the study protocol will be replaced to ensure that a total of 24 subjects complete the protocol. Subjects will be screened and recruited based on the Inclusion/Exclusion criteria outlined within this protocol. Subjects fulfilling the stated criteria and who are willing to comply must sign an informed consent prior form to study participation.
You may qualify if:
- Subject must be 21 years of age or older.
- Subjects recruited to Cohort 1 will have no known retinal disease except for refractive errors (-7.5 D to +7.5 diopters).Subjects who are recruited to Cohort 2 will have one or more of the following retinal pathologies: early and intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy, Diabetic Retinopathy (mild, moderate, severe), Macular Edema secondary to Diabetes, Retinal Vein Occlusion, Central Serous Retinopathy, Pattern Dystrophy, Epiretinal Membrane or Macular Hole.
- Subjects who have signed an informed consent form.
- Subjects who can comply with the protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects younger than 21 years of age.
- Subjects who cannot comply with the protocol.
- Subjects who cannot complete the Simple Test procedures
- Subjects who are not available to be testing 3 times during the day (Morning, Mid - Day, and Afternoon).
- Subjects with visual acuity worse than 20/100 (Best Corrected).
- Subjects with dense media opacities.
- Ocular surgery anticipated on the day of the study visit.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Optos, PLClead
- Johns Hopkins Universitycollaborator
- University of Southern Californiacollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Retina Group of Florida
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33334, United States
Johns Hopkins Unversity
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Valley Retina Institute
McAllen, Texas, 78503, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Quan Nguyen, MD Director of the Stanley M. Truhlsen Eye Institute
- Organization
- Stanley M. Truhlsen Eye Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Quan Nguyen
Johns Hopkins University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2012
First Posted
September 26, 2012
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
November 1, 2012
Study Completion
November 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 10, 2017
Results First Posted
November 30, 2015
Record last verified: 2017-04