Tracheostomy in ICU With a Double Lumen Endotracheal Tube
Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Intensive Care Unit With a Dedicated Double Lumen Endotracheal Tube
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Percutaneous tracheostomy in Intensive care unit (ICU) is performed with the use of flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope inside the conventional single lumen endotracheal tube owned by the patients. This situation may lead to many disadvantages for ventilation and airway protection of critically ill patients during the procedures. The use of double lumen endotracheal tube dedicated to the percutaneous tracheostomies may:
- 1.improve the ventilation of patients during the procedure,
- 2.protect the posterior tracheal wall from damage related to the different step of tracheostomies,
- 3.protect the lungs from blood and secretions coming down from the chosen site of tracheostomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 30, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 24, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedJuly 3, 2013
July 1, 2013
2.4 years
August 30, 2012
July 2, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
change in gas-exchange
The investigator will perform an arterial blood gas to evaluate PaO2/FiO2 ratio
at the baseline and the end of the procedure (average time expected for the procedure is 30 minutes)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
change in arterial carbon dioxide
at the baseline and at the end of the procedure (average time expected for the procedure is 30 minutes)
change in peak airway pressure
at the baseline and at the end of the procedure (average time expected for the procedure is 30 minutes)
change in plateau airway pressure
at the baseline and at the end of the procedure (average time expected for the procedure is 30 minutes)
change in air-trapping
at the baseline and at the end of the procedure (average time expected for the procedure is 30 minutes)
early complications
in the first 24 hours from the end of the procedure
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Double lumen endotracheal tube tracheostomy
OTHERTracheostomy with a dedicated double lumen endotracheal tube
Interventions
Percutaneous tracheostomy in this study will be performed with the use of a dedicated double-lumen endotracheal tube. The dedicated double-lumen endotracheal tube (Deas S.R.L, Italy) has an upper and a lower lumen. The upper one will be occupied by flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope while the lower one is exclusively dedicated to patient ventilation during the procedure. The lower lumen has a a semi-elliptical cross section. This tube will be placed in the patient airway with a direct laryngoscopy. After this intubation, a percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy will be performed with the standard techniques recognised in the literature.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age ≥ 18 years and at least one of following criteria:
- prolonged endotracheal intubation
- prolonged mechanical ventilation
- difficult/prolonged weaning
- inability to protect the airway
You may not qualify if:
- infection of neck tissues
- previous surgical neck interventions
- recent surgical interventions or fracture of the cervical spine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
University of Genoa
Genoa, Italy, 16132, Italy
University of Naples "Federico II"
Naples, Italy, 80100, Italy
Related Publications (11)
Rana S, Pendem S, Pogodzinski MS, Hubmayr RD, Gajic O. Tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005 Dec;80(12):1632-8. doi: 10.4065/80.12.1632.
PMID: 16342657BACKGROUNDDe Leyn P, Bedert L, Delcroix M, Depuydt P, Lauwers G, Sokolov Y, Van Meerhaeghe A, Van Schil P; Belgian Association of Pneumology and Belgian Association of Cardiothoracic Surgery. Tracheotomy: clinical review and guidelines. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Sep;32(3):412-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.05.018. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
PMID: 17588767BACKGROUNDKing C, Moores LK. Controversies in mechanical ventilation: when should a tracheotomy be placed? Clin Chest Med. 2008 Jun;29(2):253-63, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2008.01.002.
PMID: 18440435BACKGROUNDDurbin CG Jr. Tracheostomy: why, when, and how? Respir Care. 2010 Aug;55(8):1056-68.
PMID: 20667153BACKGROUNDMallick A, Bodenham AR. Tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Aug;27(8):676-82. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833b1ba0.
PMID: 20523214BACKGROUNDCiaglia P, Firsching R, Syniec C. Elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A new simple bedside procedure; preliminary report. Chest. 1985 Jun;87(6):715-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.87.6.715.
PMID: 3996056BACKGROUNDFantoni A, Ripamonti D. A non-derivative, non-surgical tracheostomy: the translaryngeal method. Intensive Care Med. 1997 Apr;23(4):386-92. doi: 10.1007/s001340050345.
PMID: 9142576BACKGROUNDGriggs WM, Worthley LI, Gilligan JE, Thomas PD, Myburg JA. A simple percutaneous tracheostomy technique. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 Jun;170(6):543-5.
PMID: 2343371BACKGROUNDTrottier SJ, Hazard PB, Sakabu SA, Levine JH, Troop BR, Thompson JA, McNary R. Posterior tracheal wall perforation during percutaneous dilational tracheostomy: an investigation into its mechanism and prevention. Chest. 1999 May;115(5):1383-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.5.1383.
PMID: 10334157BACKGROUNDCampos JH. Update on tracheobronchial anatomy and flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy in thoracic anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Feb;22(1):4-10. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32831a43ab.
PMID: 19295287BACKGROUNDVargas M, Pelosi P, Tessitore G, Aloj F, Brunetti I, Arditi E, Salami D, Kacmarek RM, Servillo G. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy with a double-lumen endotracheal tube: a comparison of feasibility, gas exchange, and airway pressures. Chest. 2015 May;147(5):1267-1274. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1465.
PMID: 25375865DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Paolo Pelosi, Professor
Universita degli Studi di Genova
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Giuseppe Servillo, Professor
Federico II University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Full Professor chair of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Chief of Intensive Care Unit
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 30, 2012
First Posted
September 24, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
July 3, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-07