NCT01689883

Brief Summary

The overall objective of the study is to test whether the use of small electrical currents to stimulate proprioceptors of the upper limb has potential for improving robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation in stroke survivors.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2011

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2011

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 10, 2012

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 21, 2012

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

April 24, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

September 10, 2012

Last Update Submit

April 20, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

strokeelectrical stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Fugl-Meyer Assessment

    Subjects are asked to perform upper-limb movements from which a therapist can assess the severity of movement abnormalities (e.g. flexion synergies)

    Changes in Fugl-Meyer Assessment score with vs without stimulation

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test

    Changes in Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test score with vs without stimulation

  • Motor Activity Log

    Change in Motor Activity Log score with vs without stimulation

  • Modified Ashworth Scale

    Change in Modified Ashworth Scale score with vs without stimulation

  • Box and Block test

    Change in Box and Block test score with vs without stimulation

  • Grip strength

    Change in grip strength with vs without stimulation

Study Arms (1)

Current stimulator

OTHER

The investigators have developed a device to deliver very small currents to the arm. The device will be used while subjects perform upper-limb movements using a device for upper-limb rehabilitation. Subjects will perform multiple trials of movement. During half of the trials, they will receive actual stimulation. During the other half, they will receive sham stimulation.

Device: Current stimulator

Interventions

This is a device developed by the investigators to produce sub-sensory electrical stimulation delivered via subcutaneous electrodes placed on the skin.

Current stimulator

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • unilateral and cortical, subcortical, or cerebellar stroke
  • months post-stroke
  • Upper extremity impairments but able to move upper extremity against gravity 25% of the range
  • Ability to understand directions and follow simple instructions
  • Medically stable
  • Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer between 28 and 55
  • At least four (4) months since last botox treatment
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 23

You may not qualify if:

  • Participation in other forms of therapy/ intervention for upper extremity motor recovery
  • Upper extremity or trunk fractures
  • Severe fixed contractures affecting the upper limbs
  • Severe perceptual deficits or visual field impairments
  • Severe cognitive deficits
  • Pregnant women
  • Presence of an implanted electrically operated medical device
  • Evidence of more than one clinical stroke
  • Serious medical or neurological illness
  • History of head trauma or cerebral infectious disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston

Boston, Massachusetts, 02129, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Paolo Bonato, PhD

    Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: The investigators will use a system to inject small currents in the arm while subjects perform upper-limb movements. Subjects will perform multiple trials. During half of the trials, subjects will receive actual stimulation. During the other half, subjects will receive sham stimulation.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Physiatrist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2012

First Posted

September 21, 2012

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion

July 1, 2013

Study Completion

July 1, 2013

Last Updated

April 24, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations