NCT01678586

Brief Summary

In this aim, we propose to conduct a double blinded, placebo-controlled, and randomized clinical trial to compare the clinical effectiveness of radicular pain relief by either acupuncture therapy or a course of pain medication (e.g., Gabapentin) using Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
56

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2012

Longer than P75 for not_applicable pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 31, 2012

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 5, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2012

Completed
9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2021

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 23, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 23, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

9 years

First QC Date

August 31, 2012

Results QC Date

December 13, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 1, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

PainPain management

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Changes in QST Measures in Response to Acupuncture or Gabapentin at Visit 1, Visit 4 and Visit 7 for CS, WS, HP, CP (CS: Cold Sensation; WS: Warm Sensation; HP: Heat Pain; CP: Cold Pain)

    Changes in response to heat stimulation stated as pain, sensitivity and tolerance. Responses are measured with a quantitative sensory testing (QST) device. Measurements are taken before, during, and after acupuncture treatment and throughout the gabapentin medication regimen. Measurements are taken at Visit 1 (before any intervention), Visit 4 (after session 3 for acupuncture groups or within treatment week 2 for medication groups), and Visit 7 (after session 6 for acupuncture groups or within treatment week 3 for medication groups), up to a maximum of 3 weeks for each participant.

    3 weeks apart. Taken at Visit 1 (before any intervention), Visit 4 (after session 3 for acupuncture groups or within treatment week 2 for medication groups), and Visit 7 (after session 6 for acupuncture groups.

  • Changes in QST Measures in Response to Acupuncture or Gabapentin at Visit 1, Visit 4 and Visit 7 HPT, CPT and Tol (HPT: Heat Pain Threshold; CPT: Cold Pain Threshold; Tol: Tolerance to 47°C Heat Stimulation)

    Changes in response to heat stimulation stated as pain, sensitivity and tolerance. Responses are measured with a quantitative sensory testing (QST) device. Measurements are taken before, during, and after acupuncture treatment and throughout the gabapentin medication regimen. Measurements are taken at Visit 1 (before any intervention), Visit 4 (after session 3 for acupuncture groups or within treatment week 2 for medication groups), and Visit 7 (after session 6 for acupuncture groups or within treatment week 3 for medication groups), up to a maximum of 3 weeks for each participant.

    3 weeks apart. Taken at Visit 1 (before any intervention), Visit 4 (after session 3 for acupuncture groups or within treatment week 2 for medication groups), and Visit 7 (after session 6 for acupuncture groups.

Study Arms (4)

True Acupuncture

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Pain subjects with radicular pain receiving 6, 30 minute acupuncture treatments.

Other: Acupuncture

Sham Acupuncture

SHAM COMPARATOR

Pain subjects with radicular pain receiving 6, 30 minute sham acupuncture treatments.

Other: Sham Acupuncture

Gabapentin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Pain subjects with radicular pain receiving gabapentin. Medication treatment groups will titrate up to the standard clinical treatment dosage for one week and maintain that dosage for 1.5 weeks.

Drug: Gabapentin

Sham Gabapentin

SHAM COMPARATOR

Pain subjects with radicular pain receiving sham gabapentin. Medication treatment groups will titrate up to the standard clinical treatment dosage for one week and maintain that dosage for 1.5 weeks.

Drug: Sham Gabapentin

Interventions

In true acupuncture the needles penetrate the skin.

True Acupuncture

In sham acupuncture the needles do not penetrate the skin.

Sham Acupuncture

Gabapentin is a commonly prescribed drug used to treat neuropathic pain.

Also known as: Neurontin
Gabapentin

Benadryl or diphenhydramine is used as a placebo as it could mimic some common side effects of gabapentin (i.e. sedation, drowsiness, lightheadedness)

Also known as: Benadryl, diphenhydramine
Sham Gabapentin

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject will be between ages 18 to 75 years. Both male and female subjects will be recruited.
  • Subject should have had cervical or lumbar radicular pain for at least two months. This requirement is to avoid the uncertainty of an unstable pain condition and to minimize the study variation.
  • Subject has a pain score of 4 or above (visual analog scale, VAS: 0 - 10 from no pain to worst pain).
  • Cervical or lumbar radicular pain will include, but is not limited to, such clinical conditions as disk herniation, spinal stenosis, and post-laminectomy syndrome.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject has detectable sensory deficits at the site of QST. Sensory deficits refer to such conditions resulting from neurological diseases or medical conditions causing peripheral polyneuropathy and sensory changes, which include but are not limited to diabetic neuropathy, alcoholic neuropathy, AIDS neuropathy, severe thyroid disease, and severe liver or kidney disorders.
  • Subject has scar tissue, infection, or acute injury at the site of QST.
  • Subject is pregnant.
  • Subject tests positive for illicit drugs.
  • Subject has a pacemaker.
  • Subject is currently taking gabapentin.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

MGH Center for Translational Pain Research

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Chen L, Deng H, Houle T, Zhang Y, Ahmed S, Zhang W, Sullivan S, Opalacz A, Roth S, Filatava EJ, Stabach K, Vo T, Malarick C, Kim H, You Z, Shen S, Mao J. Comparison between acupuncture therapy and gabapentin for chronic pain: a pilot study. Acupunct Med. 2021 Dec;39(6):619-628. doi: 10.1177/09645284211026683. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainAgnosia

Interventions

Acupuncture TherapyGabapentinDiphenhydramine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Complementary TherapiesTherapeuticsAminesOrganic Chemicalsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidAminobutyratesButyratesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsAcids, CarbocyclicCyclohexanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsAmino AcidsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsEthylaminesBenzhydryl CompoundsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, Aromatic

Limitations and Caveats

A major limitation is the limited number of study participants in each group. In addition, the use of a sham needle in this pilot study may not have fully differentiated sham versus true electroacupuncture. While the use of diphenhydramine as a placebo control for gabapentin may have mimicked certain side effects of gabapentin, it may have had other confounding effects on the data interpretation.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Lucy Chen
Organization
Massachusetts General Hospital

Study Officials

  • Jianren Mao, M.D., Ph.D.

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
M.D., Ph.D.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2012

First Posted

September 5, 2012

Study Start

December 1, 2012

Primary Completion

December 1, 2021

Study Completion

December 1, 2021

Last Updated

April 23, 2024

Results First Posted

April 23, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Locations