Effect of Acupuncture and Pain Medication on Radicular Pain Using QST
2 other identifiers
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this aim, we propose to conduct a double blinded, placebo-controlled, and randomized clinical trial to compare the clinical effectiveness of radicular pain relief by either acupuncture therapy or a course of pain medication (e.g., Gabapentin) using Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable pain
Started Dec 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 5, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 23, 2024
CompletedApril 23, 2024
April 1, 2024
9 years
August 31, 2012
December 13, 2023
April 1, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Changes in QST Measures in Response to Acupuncture or Gabapentin at Visit 1, Visit 4 and Visit 7 for CS, WS, HP, CP (CS: Cold Sensation; WS: Warm Sensation; HP: Heat Pain; CP: Cold Pain)
Changes in response to heat stimulation stated as pain, sensitivity and tolerance. Responses are measured with a quantitative sensory testing (QST) device. Measurements are taken before, during, and after acupuncture treatment and throughout the gabapentin medication regimen. Measurements are taken at Visit 1 (before any intervention), Visit 4 (after session 3 for acupuncture groups or within treatment week 2 for medication groups), and Visit 7 (after session 6 for acupuncture groups or within treatment week 3 for medication groups), up to a maximum of 3 weeks for each participant.
3 weeks apart. Taken at Visit 1 (before any intervention), Visit 4 (after session 3 for acupuncture groups or within treatment week 2 for medication groups), and Visit 7 (after session 6 for acupuncture groups.
Changes in QST Measures in Response to Acupuncture or Gabapentin at Visit 1, Visit 4 and Visit 7 HPT, CPT and Tol (HPT: Heat Pain Threshold; CPT: Cold Pain Threshold; Tol: Tolerance to 47°C Heat Stimulation)
Changes in response to heat stimulation stated as pain, sensitivity and tolerance. Responses are measured with a quantitative sensory testing (QST) device. Measurements are taken before, during, and after acupuncture treatment and throughout the gabapentin medication regimen. Measurements are taken at Visit 1 (before any intervention), Visit 4 (after session 3 for acupuncture groups or within treatment week 2 for medication groups), and Visit 7 (after session 6 for acupuncture groups or within treatment week 3 for medication groups), up to a maximum of 3 weeks for each participant.
3 weeks apart. Taken at Visit 1 (before any intervention), Visit 4 (after session 3 for acupuncture groups or within treatment week 2 for medication groups), and Visit 7 (after session 6 for acupuncture groups.
Study Arms (4)
True Acupuncture
ACTIVE COMPARATORPain subjects with radicular pain receiving 6, 30 minute acupuncture treatments.
Sham Acupuncture
SHAM COMPARATORPain subjects with radicular pain receiving 6, 30 minute sham acupuncture treatments.
Gabapentin
ACTIVE COMPARATORPain subjects with radicular pain receiving gabapentin. Medication treatment groups will titrate up to the standard clinical treatment dosage for one week and maintain that dosage for 1.5 weeks.
Sham Gabapentin
SHAM COMPARATORPain subjects with radicular pain receiving sham gabapentin. Medication treatment groups will titrate up to the standard clinical treatment dosage for one week and maintain that dosage for 1.5 weeks.
Interventions
Gabapentin is a commonly prescribed drug used to treat neuropathic pain.
Benadryl or diphenhydramine is used as a placebo as it could mimic some common side effects of gabapentin (i.e. sedation, drowsiness, lightheadedness)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject will be between ages 18 to 75 years. Both male and female subjects will be recruited.
- Subject should have had cervical or lumbar radicular pain for at least two months. This requirement is to avoid the uncertainty of an unstable pain condition and to minimize the study variation.
- Subject has a pain score of 4 or above (visual analog scale, VAS: 0 - 10 from no pain to worst pain).
- Cervical or lumbar radicular pain will include, but is not limited to, such clinical conditions as disk herniation, spinal stenosis, and post-laminectomy syndrome.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has detectable sensory deficits at the site of QST. Sensory deficits refer to such conditions resulting from neurological diseases or medical conditions causing peripheral polyneuropathy and sensory changes, which include but are not limited to diabetic neuropathy, alcoholic neuropathy, AIDS neuropathy, severe thyroid disease, and severe liver or kidney disorders.
- Subject has scar tissue, infection, or acute injury at the site of QST.
- Subject is pregnant.
- Subject tests positive for illicit drugs.
- Subject has a pacemaker.
- Subject is currently taking gabapentin.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
MGH Center for Translational Pain Research
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Related Publications (1)
Chen L, Deng H, Houle T, Zhang Y, Ahmed S, Zhang W, Sullivan S, Opalacz A, Roth S, Filatava EJ, Stabach K, Vo T, Malarick C, Kim H, You Z, Shen S, Mao J. Comparison between acupuncture therapy and gabapentin for chronic pain: a pilot study. Acupunct Med. 2021 Dec;39(6):619-628. doi: 10.1177/09645284211026683. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
PMID: 34325532DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
A major limitation is the limited number of study participants in each group. In addition, the use of a sham needle in this pilot study may not have fully differentiated sham versus true electroacupuncture. While the use of diphenhydramine as a placebo control for gabapentin may have mimicked certain side effects of gabapentin, it may have had other confounding effects on the data interpretation.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Lucy Chen
- Organization
- Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jianren Mao, M.D., Ph.D.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D., Ph.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2012
First Posted
September 5, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2021
Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
April 23, 2024
Results First Posted
April 23, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04