Evaluating the Effect of Acupuncture on Pain Relief Using Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)
2 other identifiers
interventional
254
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to explore a new approach in assessing the effectiveness of acupuncture therapy in the treatment chronic pain conditions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable pain
Started Jan 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 2, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2021
CompletedMay 2, 2022
April 1, 2022
6.4 years
March 19, 2010
April 10, 2018
April 4, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Heat Pain Tolerance - Baseline: Maximum Temperature (Heat) That Could be Tolerated by Participants
Changes in response to heat stimulation stated as tolerance to heat. Responses are measured with a quantitative sensory testing (QST) device. Measurements were taken before the course of a 4 week acupuncture treatment schedule.
Start of Week 1
Heat Pain Tolerance - Visit 2 or 4: Maximum Temperature (Heat) That Could be Tolerated by Participants
Changes in response to heat stimulation stated as tolerance to heat. Responses are measured with a quantitative sensory testing (QST) device. Measurements were taken during the course of a 4 week acupuncture treatment schedule. Those in the no treatment groups were attending their 2nd visit, which occured on the same timeline as if they were attending the 4th visit as a treatment group subject.
End of Week 2
Heat Pain Tolerance - Visit 3 or 7: Maximum Temperature (Heat) That Could be Tolerated by Participants
Changes in response to heat stimulation stated as tolerance to heat. Responses are measured with a quantitative sensory testing (QST) device. Measurements were taken after the course of a 4 week acupuncture treatment schedule. Those in the no treatment groups were attending their 3rd visit, which occured on the same timeline as if they were attending the 7th visit as a treatment group subject.
End of Week 4
Cold Pain Tolerance - Baseline: Maximum Temperature (Cold) That Could be Tolerated by Participants
Changes in response to cold stimulation stated as tolerance to cold. Responses are measured with a quantitative sensory testing (QST) device. Measurements were taken before the course of a 4 week acupuncture treatment schedule.
Start of Week 1
Cold Pain Tolerance - Visit 2 or 4: Maximum Temperature (Cold) That Could be Tolerated by Participants
Changes in response to cold stimulation stated as tolerance to cold. Responses are measured with a quantitative sensory testing (QST) device. Measurements were taken during the course of a 4 week acupuncture treatment schedule. Those in the no treatment groups were attending their 2nd visit, which occured on the same timeline as if they were attending the 4th visit as a treatment group subject.
End of Week 2
Cold Pain Tolerance - Visit 3 or 7: Maximum Temperature (Cold) That Could be Tolerated by Participants
Changes in response to cold stimulation stated as tolerance to cold. Responses are measured with a quantitative sensory testing (QST) device. Measurements were taken after the course of a 4 week acupuncture treatment schedule. Those in the no treatment groups were attending their 3rd visit, which occured on the same timeline as if they were attending the 7th visit as a treatment group subject.
End of Week 4
Study Arms (6)
Healthy - True Acupuncture
ACTIVE COMPARATORHealthy volunteers with no neck or back pain who attended 7 visits over 4 weeks and received 6 30 minute acupuncture treatment sessions during visits 2-7.This group received true acupuncture treatment (the needles punctured the skin).
Healthy - Sham Acupuncture
SHAM COMPARATORHealthy with no neck or back pain who attended 7 visits over 4 weeks and received 6 30 minute acupuncture treatment sessions during visits 2-7. This group received sham acupuncture treatment (the needles did not puncture the skin).
Healthy - No Treatment
NO INTERVENTIONHealthy volunteers with no neck or back pain who attended 3 visits over 4 weeks and received no sham or true acupuncture treatment.
Pain - True Acupuncture
ACTIVE COMPARATORVolunteers with radiating neck or back pain who attended 7 visits over 4 weeks and received 6 30 minute acupuncture treatment sessions during visits 2-7. This group received true acupuncture treatment (the needles punctured the skin).
Pain - Sham Acupuncture
SHAM COMPARATORVolunteers with radiating neck or back pain who attended 7 visits over 4 weeks and received 6 30 minute acupuncture treatment sessions during visits 2-7. This group received sham acupuncture treatment (the needles did not puncture the skin).
Pain - No Treatment
NO INTERVENTIONVolunteers with radiating neck or back pain who attended 3 visits over 4 weeks and received no sham or true acupuncture treatment.
Interventions
Subjects receive 6 acupuncture treatments for neck or back pain.
Subjects receive 6 sham acupuncture treatments for neck or back pain.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject will be between ages 18 to 65 years. Both male and female subjects will be recruited.
- Subject should have had cervical or lumbar radicular pain for at least two months. This requirement is to avoid the uncertainty of an unstable pain condition and to minimize the study variation.
- Subject has a pain score of 4 or above (Visual Analog Scale (VAS): 0 - 10 from no pain to worst pain).
- Cervical or lumbar radicular pain will include, but is not limited to, such clinical conditions as disk herniation, spinal stenosis, and post-laminectomy syndrome.
- For controls, healthy subjects without radicular pain for at least three months will be recruited. \*We are no longer accepting healthy volunteers.\*
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has detectable sensory deficits at the site of QST. Sensory deficits refer to such conditions resulting from neurological diseases or medical conditions causing peripheral polyneuropathy and sensory changes, which include but are not limited to diabetic neuropathy, alcoholic neuropathy, AIDS neuropathy, severe thyroid disease, and severe liver or kidney disorders.
- Subject has scar tissue, infection, or acute injury at the site of QST.
- Subject is on anticoagulation therapy.
- Subject is pregnant.
- Subject is tested positive on illicit drugs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
MGH Center for Translational Pain Research
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Lucy Chen
- Organization
- Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lucy Chen, MD
Massachusetts General Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2010
First Posted
March 29, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
May 2, 2022
Results First Posted
July 2, 2018
Record last verified: 2022-04