Evaluation of Office-Based Sheathed Flexible Nasopharyngoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The processing of standard flexible nasopharyngoscopes is a time-consuming and costly process. The goal of this study is to determine the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of sheathed flexible endoscope in an office setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 7, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 20, 2012
CompletedSeptember 16, 2016
September 1, 2016
August 7, 2012
September 14, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient pain and discomfort
Patient Pain and Discomfort i. Patient's reported level of pain based on International Association for the Study of Pain definitions of pain on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale ii. Patient's reported level of discomfort on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale
1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Physician and staff satisfaction
1 week
Optical quality
1 hour
Study Arms (2)
Traditional flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy
NO INTERVENTIONNo sheath procedure
Sheath flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORFlexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy using endosheath
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients presenting to the Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery service with complaints warranting flexible endoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- Known sinonasal masses or nasal polyposis
- Unable to complete VAS surveys
- Significant septal deviation
- Unable to tolerate in-office flexible nasopharyngoscopy
- Patients who refuse consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6H 2H7, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr. Allan Ho
University of Alberta
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2012
First Posted
August 20, 2012
Last Updated
September 16, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09