NCT01658280

Brief Summary

The main purpose of the present study is to assess whether the sensitivity of Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is superior to that of conventional TBNA in the diagnosis of hilar/mediastinal adenopathy and lung cancer staging.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
253

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2012

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2012

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 7, 2012

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2016

Status Verified

February 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

August 1, 2012

Last Update Submit

February 2, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

transbronchial needle aspirationultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspirationsensitivityhilar/mediastinal adenopathy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To compare the sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA and conventional TBNA in the diagnosis of hilar/mediastinal adenopathies

    The sensitivity is defined as the rate of true positive diagnoses/(true positive + false negative). Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA will be considered superior to that of conventional TBNA if it will achieve at least a value of 90%

    36 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Specificity of TBNA and EBUS-TBNA

    36 months

  • Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA performed after the possible failure of traditional TBNA

    36 months

  • Number of partecipants with adverse events

    36 months

  • Costs related to each diagnostic strategy

    36 months

  • Procedural time

    36 months

Study Arms (2)

Conventional TBNA + ROSE

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients allocated in this group will undergo conventional TBNA, performed in a bronchoscopy suite by the same operator under conscious sedation, using 19-G needle size. Three needle passes for each approachable station will be performed. The samples obtained will be examined on-site by experienced blinded cytopathologist. In case of samples obtained from conventional TBNA defined as "non diagnostic", the operator will shift to the EBUS procedure.All specimens obtained will be send to definitive cytological and histological evaluation and the final diagnosis will be collected and reported on CRFs

Device: EBUS-TBNA

EBUS-TBNA + ROSE

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients allocated in the intervention group will undergo EBUS-TBNA procedure, performed in a bronchoscopy suite by the same operator under conscious sedation Three needle passes for each approachable station will be performed. The samples obtained will be examined on-site by experienced blinded cytopathologist.All specimens obtained will be send to definitive cytological and histological evaluation and the final diagnosis will be collected and reported on CRFs

Device: EBUS-TBNA

Interventions

EBUS-TBNADEVICE

Patients allocated in the intervention group will undergo EBUS-TBNA procedure, performed in a bronchoscopy suite by the same operator under conscious sedation Three needle passes for each approachable station will be performed. The samples obtained will be examined on-site by experienced blinded cytopathologist.All specimens obtained will be send to definitive cytological and histological evaluation and the final diagnosis will be collected and reported on CRFs

Conventional TBNA + ROSEEBUS-TBNA + ROSE

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age ≥ 18years;
  • presence of at least one hilar/mediastinal adenopathy \>1 cm on short axis assessed by contrast-enhanced CT scan in at least one approachable stations other than 2R and 2L;
  • ability to give an informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • presence of mediastinal adenopathy in stations 2R and 2L;
  • coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis that cannot be corrected;
  • severe refractory hypoxemia;
  • unstable hemodynamic status;
  • inability to give an informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pulmonary Diseases Unit, Department of Immunoallergic and Respiratory Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria 'Ospedali Riuniti'

Ancona, The Marches, 60100, Italy

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Herth F, Becker HD, Ernst A. Conventional vs endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a randomized trial. Chest. 2004 Jan;125(1):322-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.1.322.

    PMID: 14718460BACKGROUND
  • Gasparini S. It is time for this 'ROSE' to flower. Respiration. 2005 Mar-Apr;72(2):129-31. doi: 10.1159/000084041. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15824520BACKGROUND
  • Toloza EM, Harpole L, Detterbeck F, McCrory DC. Invasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a review of the current evidence. Chest. 2003 Jan;123(1 Suppl):157S-166S. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.1_suppl.157s.

    PMID: 12527575BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

LymphomaLung NeoplasmsSarcoidosisHypersensitivity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsLymphoproliferative DisordersLymphatic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesImmunoproliferative DisordersImmune System DiseasesRespiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesHypersensitivity, Delayed

Study Officials

  • Stefano Gasparini, Professor

    Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2012

First Posted

August 7, 2012

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion

May 1, 2015

Study Completion

July 1, 2015

Last Updated

February 3, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-02

Locations