Conventional Versus Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for the Diagnosis of Hilar/Mediastinal Lymphadenopathies
1 other identifier
interventional
253
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main purpose of the present study is to assess whether the sensitivity of Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is superior to that of conventional TBNA in the diagnosis of hilar/mediastinal adenopathy and lung cancer staging.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Aug 2012
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 7, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2015
CompletedFebruary 3, 2016
February 1, 2016
2.7 years
August 1, 2012
February 2, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To compare the sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA and conventional TBNA in the diagnosis of hilar/mediastinal adenopathies
The sensitivity is defined as the rate of true positive diagnoses/(true positive + false negative). Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA will be considered superior to that of conventional TBNA if it will achieve at least a value of 90%
36 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Specificity of TBNA and EBUS-TBNA
36 months
Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA performed after the possible failure of traditional TBNA
36 months
Number of partecipants with adverse events
36 months
Costs related to each diagnostic strategy
36 months
Procedural time
36 months
Study Arms (2)
Conventional TBNA + ROSE
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients allocated in this group will undergo conventional TBNA, performed in a bronchoscopy suite by the same operator under conscious sedation, using 19-G needle size. Three needle passes for each approachable station will be performed. The samples obtained will be examined on-site by experienced blinded cytopathologist. In case of samples obtained from conventional TBNA defined as "non diagnostic", the operator will shift to the EBUS procedure.All specimens obtained will be send to definitive cytological and histological evaluation and the final diagnosis will be collected and reported on CRFs
EBUS-TBNA + ROSE
EXPERIMENTALPatients allocated in the intervention group will undergo EBUS-TBNA procedure, performed in a bronchoscopy suite by the same operator under conscious sedation Three needle passes for each approachable station will be performed. The samples obtained will be examined on-site by experienced blinded cytopathologist.All specimens obtained will be send to definitive cytological and histological evaluation and the final diagnosis will be collected and reported on CRFs
Interventions
Patients allocated in the intervention group will undergo EBUS-TBNA procedure, performed in a bronchoscopy suite by the same operator under conscious sedation Three needle passes for each approachable station will be performed. The samples obtained will be examined on-site by experienced blinded cytopathologist.All specimens obtained will be send to definitive cytological and histological evaluation and the final diagnosis will be collected and reported on CRFs
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age ≥ 18years;
- presence of at least one hilar/mediastinal adenopathy \>1 cm on short axis assessed by contrast-enhanced CT scan in at least one approachable stations other than 2R and 2L;
- ability to give an informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- presence of mediastinal adenopathy in stations 2R and 2L;
- coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis that cannot be corrected;
- severe refractory hypoxemia;
- unstable hemodynamic status;
- inability to give an informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pulmonary Diseases Unit, Department of Immunoallergic and Respiratory Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria 'Ospedali Riuniti'
Ancona, The Marches, 60100, Italy
Related Publications (3)
Herth F, Becker HD, Ernst A. Conventional vs endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a randomized trial. Chest. 2004 Jan;125(1):322-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.1.322.
PMID: 14718460BACKGROUNDGasparini S. It is time for this 'ROSE' to flower. Respiration. 2005 Mar-Apr;72(2):129-31. doi: 10.1159/000084041. No abstract available.
PMID: 15824520BACKGROUNDToloza EM, Harpole L, Detterbeck F, McCrory DC. Invasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a review of the current evidence. Chest. 2003 Jan;123(1 Suppl):157S-166S. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.1_suppl.157s.
PMID: 12527575BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stefano Gasparini, Professor
Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2012
First Posted
August 7, 2012
Study Start
August 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
July 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 3, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02