Study Stopped
Manufacturer did not develop and deliver the necessary biopsy forceps needles in time
EBUS-TBNA Versus EBUS-TBNB
Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) Versus Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Biopsy (EBUS-TBNB) in the Assessment of Mediastinal and Hilar Lymphadenopathy: a Randomised Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
2 countries
3
Brief Summary
A prospective diagnostic clinical study randomising patients undergoing endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) of enlarged mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes to have sampling using the usual EBUS-TBNA needle or a novel biopsy forceps (EBUS-TBNB). The study aims to establish whether the use of EBUS-TBNB can significantly increase the diagnostic yield over EBUS-TBNA, without an increase in complication rates.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started May 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 4, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 9, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedJuly 13, 2016
July 1, 2016
2.2 years
November 4, 2011
July 12, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The percentage of lymph nodes sampled resulting in a definitive diagnosis (as defined in the protocol) in the two study arms.
The definition of a "definitive diagnosis" is dependant on the diagnosis and is clarified below: * Carcinoma/lymphoma: The lymph node sample is adequate to make a diagnosis as well as provide immunohistochemistry information enabling subtyping of the tumour. * Sarcoidosis: The presence of well formed epithelioid non-caseating granulomas. * Mycobacterial infection: The presence of caseating granulomas, positive Ziehl Nielson staining for acid fast bacilli, or the tissue successfully cultures Mycobacterium.
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The difference in the complication rate between the two study arms
24 months
Study Arms (2)
EBUS-TBNA
ACTIVE COMPARATORSampling using endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration
EBUS-TBNB
EXPERIMENTALSampling using endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial forceps biopsy needle.
Interventions
Patients with enlarged mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes have these sampled under endobronchial ultrasound guidance using either the EBUS-TBNA needle or the EBUS-TBNB biopsy forceps.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Scheduled for EBUS-TBNA as part of clinical care
- Lymph nodes larger than 10mm in diameter
- Age \> 18 years
- Able to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications for needle or forceps biopsy (e.g. coagulopathy, anticoagulation, thrombocytopenia)
- Inability to obtain informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trustlead
- Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- Heidelberg Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg
Heidelberg, D-69126, Germany
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
London, SW10 9NH, United Kingdom
The Royal Brompton Hospital
London, SW3 6NP, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Zaid Zoumot, MBBS, MRCP, MSc
Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Fundation Trust
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pallav L Shah, MD, FRCP
Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 4, 2011
First Posted
November 9, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
July 13, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07