Efficacy and Safety of PRO-148 Versus Systane®, in Patients With Mild to Moderate Dry Eye
A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PRO-148 Versus Systane®, in Patients With Mild to Moderate Dry Eye
1 other identifier
interventional
183
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of the ophthalmic solution PRO-148 in the ocular surface of patients with mild to moderate dry eye compared with ophthalmic solution Systane®
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Nov 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 15, 2017
CompletedDecember 15, 2017
May 1, 2017
1.3 years
July 19, 2012
June 14, 2016
May 8, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI©) Questionnaire
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI©) questionnaire , consists of 12 questions divided in 3 groups, Each question has a value that can go from 0 to 4 points according to the severity of the case: 0.None of the time, 1. Some of the time, 2.Half of the time, 3.most of the time and 4 all of the time. The points of all the questions will be used in the following formula for converted to a score of 0-100 : (sum of scores) x 25 / (# of questions answered), where 0 represents normality or non-symptomatology and 100 the most severe case. Will be used to measure the symptoms of dry eye disease by obtaining baseline data and comparing them against the last visit.
Day 60
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Schirmer Test
Day 60
Tear Film Break up Time
Day 60
Study Arms (2)
PRO-148
EXPERIMENTALPRO-148 containing: xanthan gum and sulphate chondroitin, ophthalmic solution doses: 1 drop in each eye, quarter in day
Systane®
ACTIVE COMPARATORSystane containing: polyethylene glycol 400 0.4%, propylene glycol 0.3% and hydroxypropyl guar doses: 1 drop in each eye, quarter in day
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mild to moderate dry eye patients based on the Report of International Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS)
- OSDI score between 12 and 45
- Provided informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with one blind eye
- Visual acuity of 20/100 or worst in any eye
- Patients with any active ocular disease that would interfere with study interpretation
- Patients in treatment with any medication that could interfere with the study, contraindication of any medication used in the protocol
- Patients with history of hypersensitivity or contraindication for any drug used in the study
- Contact lens users
- Pregnant patients, at risk of pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Patients without birth control treatment
- Patients who had participated in any clinical trial in the last 90 days
- Legal or mentally disabled patients who could not give informed consent
- Patients who do not provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Consultorio privado
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44600, Mexico
Related Publications (1)
Perez-Balbuena AL, Ochoa-Tabares JC, Belalcazar-Rey S, Urzua-Salinas C, Saucedo-Rodriguez LR, Velasco-Ramos R, Suarez-Sanchez RG, Rodriguez-Carrizalez AD, Oregon-Miranda AA. Efficacy of a fixed combination of 0.09 % xanthan gum/0.1 % chondroitin sulfate preservative free vs polyethylene glycol/propylene glycol in subjects with dry eye disease: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep 20;16(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0343-9.
PMID: 27645318DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was performed according to the clinical protocol.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Leopoldo M Baiza-Duran MD, Director of Clinical Trials
- Organization
- Laboratorios Sophia S.A. de C.V.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Leopoldo M Baiza-Durán, MD
Laboratorios Sophia S.A de C.V.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2012
First Posted
August 6, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 15, 2017
Results First Posted
December 15, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The personal data of the study subjects were treated with Confidentiality policy.