NCT01240382

Brief Summary

To investigate that the efficacy of 3% DE-089 ophthalmic solution (one drop at a time, 6 times daily, 4 weeks topical administration), in comparison to 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution (0.1% HA) (one drop at a time, 6 times daily, 4 weeks topical administration), is at least non-inferior in the change in fluorescein staining score, and is superior in the change in Rose bengal score, in a multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group comparison study. Safety profile will likewise be compared.

Trial Health

80
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
332

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2008

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 12, 2010

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 15, 2010

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 8, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

August 13, 2014

Status Verified

August 1, 2014

First QC Date

November 12, 2010

Results QC Date

May 23, 2014

Last Update Submit

August 8, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Mean Change in Fluorescein Staining Score From Baseline

    Fluorescein staining was scored according to the protocol by Shimmura et al. The cornea was divided into 3 equal zones: upper, middle, and lower. Each zone had a staining score ranging between 0 and 3 points, with minimum and maximum total staining scores ranging between 0 and 9 points. 0 is better. The degree of staining with Fluorescein dyes was scored as follows: 0 = no staining, 1= staining of less than half of the area, 2= staining of more than half of the area, 3= staining in the whole area.

    Baseline and 4-week (discontinued (LOCF))

  • Mean Change in Rose Bengal Staining Score From Baseline

    Rose bengal staining were scored according to the protocol by Shimmura et al. The ocular surface was divided into 5 zones: nasal and temporal conjunctival, and upper, middle, and lower corneal areas. A staining score between 0 and 3 points was used in each zone, with the minimum and maximum total staining scores ranging between 0 and 15 points.0 is better. The degree of staining with Rose bengal dyes was scored as follows: 0 = no staining, 1= staining of less than half of the area, 2= staining of more than half of the area, 3= staining in the whole area.

    Baseline and 4-week (discontinued (LOCF))

Study Arms (2)

3% DE-089

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: 3% DE-089 ophthalmic solution

0.1% HA

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Those who show:
  • Keratoconjunctival disorder confirmed with vital dye staining
  • Abnormal Schirmer score results

You may not qualify if:

  • Eye disease that needs therapy other than that for dry eye
  • Those who need to wear contact lenses during the clinical study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Santen study sites

Osaka, Osaka, Japan

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Takamura E, Tsubota K, Watanabe H, Ohashi Y; Diquafosol Ophthalmic Solution Phase 3 Study Group. A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Oct;96(10):1310-5. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301448. Epub 2012 Aug 21.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lacrimal Apparatus DiseasesEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
General Manager of Clinical Development Group
Organization
Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2010

First Posted

November 15, 2010

Primary Completion

February 1, 2008

Last Updated

August 13, 2014

Results First Posted

August 8, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-08

Locations