Assess the Safety and Efficacy of CsA Ophthalmic Gel in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Disease
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of CsA Ophthalmic Gel in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
644
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of CsA ophthalmic gel in the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye disease .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Nov 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 5, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 16, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 14, 2021
CompletedApril 29, 2022
April 1, 2022
9 months
August 27, 2020
April 21, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients whose corneal fluorescein staining score (ICSS) decreased by ≥1 point from baseline at visit 5 (study eye)
ICSS:no staining = 0,few/rare punctate lesions = 1,discrete and countable lesions = 2,lesions too numerous to count,but not coalescent = 3,coalescent = 4
84 days after admission
Secondary Outcomes (6)
EDS score at the NO.3, NO.4 and NO.5 visit was compared with the baseline EDS score (binocular)
14 days after admission ,42 days after admission ,84days days after admission
Average changes in VAS scores of 6 dry eye symptoms (burning/needling sensation, pruritus, foreign body sensation, discomfort, photophobia and pain) at the NO.3, NO.4 and NO.5 visit were compared with baseline (binocular)
14 days after admission ,42 days after admission ,84days days after admission
corneal fluorescein staining score (ICSS)at the NO.3, NO.4 and NO.5 visit was compared with the baseline (binocular)
14 days after admission ,42 days after admission ,84days days after admission
oxford score at the NO.3, NO.4 and NO.5 visit was compared with the baseline (binocular)
14 days after admission ,42 days after admission ,84days days after admission
Tear break-up time(BUT) at the NO.3, NO.4 and NO.5 visit was compared with the baseline (binocular)
14 days after admission,42 days after admission ,84days days after admission
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Experimental Group
EXPERIMENTAL322 subjects will be treated with CsA eye gel: 0.3 g: 0.15 mg, 1 times daily, The treatment period is 12 weeks. The basic medicine is Hypromellose Eye Drops, 3 times daily for 12 weeks.
Control group
PLACEBO COMPARATOR322 subjects will be treated with Placebo : 0 g: 0mg, 1 times daily, The treatment period is 12 weeks. The basic medicine is Hypromellose Eye Drops, 3 times daily for 12 weeks.
Interventions
Hypromellose Eye Drops of 10ml:50mg, 3 times daily, 1-2 drop
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- )18≤Age≤80, both male and female 2)According to the symptoms and signs and ophthalmologic examinations, the patients were diagnosed as moderate to severe dry eye
- EDS score is more than 40 points;
- BUT is less than 10 s;
- Schirmer test result is less than 10mm/5 min;
- ICSS≥2 points. 3)The ICSS score of baseline decreased by≤ 20% compared with that of screening period 4)Agree to participate in the study and voluntarily sign informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Severe dry eye patients requiring surgical treatment
- Had inner eye surgery within 12 months prior to screening or required inner eye surgery during the study period;Eyelid surgery was performed within 6 months prior to screening
- Patients receiving permanent lacrimal insertion or patients receiving temporary lacrimal insertion within 6 months prior to screening;
- Operation-induced dry eye
- Glaucoma patients;
- Unwilling to avoid wearing contact lenses;
- Systemic inflammation or active eye infection and blepharitis;
- Patients with multiple episodes of viral keratitis
- Patients with ocular cicatricial pemphigoid, obvious conjunctival scar, ocular chemical burn and neurotrophic keratoconjunctivitis
- Patients with malignant tumors in the past 5 years, except the thoroughly cured basal cell carcinoma of skin, squamous cell carcinoma in situ of skin, and primordial cervical cancer;
- Perimenopausal women are taking hormone replacement therapy
- Patients who cannot stop using other eye drops and other ophthalmic preparations during the study period;
- Patients with severe cardiopulmonary diseases, uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes, etc. that affect the collection or compliance of study parameters;
- ALT and AST ≥ 2 times of the normal upper limit, and serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 times of the normal upper limit
- With a history of central nervous system disease or epilepsy, and/or a mental state that does not cooperate
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ophthalmological Center of Zhongshan University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China
Related Publications (9)
Utine CA, Stern M, Akpek EK. Clinical review: topical ophthalmic use of cyclosporin A. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2010 Oct;18(5):352-61. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2010.498657.
PMID: 20735287RESULTKunert KS, Tisdale AS, Gipson IK. Goblet cell numbers and epithelial proliferation in the conjunctiva of patients with dry eye syndrome treated with cyclosporine. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Mar;120(3):330-7. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.3.330.
PMID: 11879137RESULTStrong B, Farley W, Stern ME, Pflugfelder SC. Topical cyclosporine inhibits conjunctival epithelial apoptosis in experimental murine keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Cornea. 2005 Jan;24(1):80-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000133994.22392.47.
PMID: 15604871RESULTPerry HD, Doshi-Carnevale S, Donnenfeld ED, Solomon R, Biser SA, Bloom AH. Efficacy of commercially available topical cyclosporine A 0.05% in the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea. 2006 Feb;25(2):171-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000176611.88579.0a.
PMID: 16371776RESULTLeonardi A, Messmer EM, Labetoulle M, Amrane M, Garrigue JS, Ismail D, Sainz-de-la-Maza M, Figueiredo FC, Baudouin C. Efficacy and safety of 0.1% ciclosporin A cationic emulsion in dry eye disease: a pooled analysis of two double-masked, randomised, vehicle-controlled phase III clinical studies. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;103(1):125-131. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311801. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
PMID: 29545413RESULTKim EC, Choi JS, Joo CK. A comparison of vitamin a and cyclosporine a 0.05% eye drops for treatment of dry eye syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Feb;147(2):206-213.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.08.015. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
PMID: 18848318RESULTHolland EJ, Luchs J, Karpecki PM, Nichols KK, Jackson MA, Sall K, Tauber J, Roy M, Raychaudhuri A, Shojaei A. Lifitegrast for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: Results of a Phase III, Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Trial (OPUS-3). Ophthalmology. 2017 Jan;124(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.025. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
PMID: 28079022RESULTTauber J, Karpecki P, Latkany R, Luchs J, Martel J, Sall K, Raychaudhuri A, Smith V, Semba CP; OPUS-2 Investigators. Lifitegrast Ophthalmic Solution 5.0% versus Placebo for Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: Results of the Randomized Phase III OPUS-2 Study. Ophthalmology. 2015 Dec;122(12):2423-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
PMID: 26365210RESULTBron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea. 2003 Oct;22(7):640-50. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200310000-00008.
PMID: 14508260RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
shiyou zhou, PHD
Ophthalmological Center of Zhongshan University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2020
First Posted
September 9, 2020
Study Start
November 5, 2020
Primary Completion
August 16, 2021
Study Completion
October 14, 2021
Last Updated
April 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share