NCT01656044

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research study is to evaluate if a negative-pressure dressing placed over a surgical incision can reduce the risk of developing a surgical site infection compared to a commonly-used sterile gauze incision dressing. In this study, the negative-pressure dressing will be compared to a standard post-surgical sterile gauze dressing. In this study patients will either receive a negative-pressure dressing or a standard sterile gauze dressing

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
375

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2012

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 31, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 2, 2012

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

July 3, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

July 31, 2012

Last Update Submit

July 2, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rate of incisional surgical site infection (SSI), which includes superficial incisional SSIs and deep incisional SSIs as defined by the Center of Disease Control and Prevention

    Results will be analyzed initially using descriptive statistics. The proportion of SSI in the NPT group will be compared to the standard post-operative dressing group using a chi square test of proportions.

    30 days

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Rates of organ/space SSIs, seromas, hematomas, incisional cellulitis, and wound opening for any reason

    30 days

  • The cost of NPT and SSD, as well as estimate additional costs associated with incisional SSIs in affected patients

    30 days

Study Arms (2)

Arm I (SSD)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients receive SSD over their closed laparotomy incision at the conclusion of their surgery.

Procedure: wound care management

Arm II (NPT)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receive NPT dressing over their closed laparotomy incision at the conclusion of their surgery.

Procedure: wound care management

Interventions

Receive SSD

Arm I (SSD)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Surgical resection for a colorectal, pancreatic, or peritoneal surface malignancy
  • The scheduled procedure will be performed via midline laparotomy
  • The planned procedure is a clean-contaminated (class II) case (includes gastric, small bowel, and colorectal resections, as well as bile or pancreatic duct transections)
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document (either directly or via a legally authorized representative)

You may not qualify if:

  • Emergent cases will not be included in the study
  • Pregnant patients will not be included in the study as pregnancy is a relative contraindication for these types of surgical procedures
  • Clean (class I), contaminated (class III) and dirty (class IV) procedures will likewise be excluded
  • Patients on chronic immunosuppressive medications, including steroids, within the past three months
  • Patients with a history of skin allergy to iodine or adhesive drapes
  • The planned procedure involves foreign material (such as mesh or subcutaneous drains) being left in the subcutaneous space at the time of surgery (for example, a ventral hernia repair); surgical drains that are placed to drain an intraabdominal space and exit the abdominal wall remote from the incision are allowed in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colonic NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsRectal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsPancreatic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsRectal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Perry Shen

    Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2012

First Posted

August 2, 2012

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion

October 1, 2016

Study Completion

October 1, 2016

Last Updated

July 3, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-07

Locations