Comparison of Continuous Non-invasive Pressure Device Versus Invasive Pressure Measurement During Prehospital Emergency
Evaluation of a Continuous Non-invasive Arterial Pressure Device in Comparison With Invasive Pressure Measurement During Out-of-hospital Emergency
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to evaluate the accuracy of continuous non-invasive AP monitoring (CNAP) compared to simultaneous IBP measurement in intensive care patients undergoing a transport in the ambulance car. Since CNAP finger blood pressure is calibrated to NBP level, a systematic bias between IBP and CNAP as described by a recent FDA meta analysis \[ \] is expected. The most important factor of CNAP system performance is its ability to accurately track blood pressure changes. Thus, the purpose of this investigation is to show that the bias between CNAP and IBP falls within the expected range and that blood pressure alterations are detected instantaneously. The endpoints of the study are:
- The agreement of systolic, diastolic and mean CNAP and IBP readings determined on a beat-to-beat basis during:
- Takeover of the patient on the intensive care unit,
- Transport of the patient from the intensive care unit to the ambulance car
- Transport of the patient in the ambulance car
- The agreement of systolic, diastolic and mean CNAP and IBP blood pres-sure changes determined on a beat-to-beat basis during:
- Takeover of the patient on the intensive care unit,
- Transport of the patient from the intensive care unit to the ambulance car
- Transport of the patient in the ambulance car The beat-to-beat readings of CNAP and IBP will be automatically recorded electronically on a memory card in the transport monitor. CNAP data will additionally be recorded directly on the CNAP Monitor with a memory stick. Safety will be assessed by clinical observations as well as adverse events (AE) recording.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Aug 2011
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 25, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2012
CompletedJune 25, 2012
June 1, 2012
1 year
November 2, 2011
June 22, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
agreement with invasive blood pressure
beat-to-beat readings of CNAP and IBP
1 year
Study Arms (1)
Cohort
Emergency Patients with applied arterial blood pressure measurement
Interventions
Continuous non-invasive arterial blood pressure recording
Eligibility Criteria
ICU Patients with established arterial pressure measurement
You may qualify if:
- Patients willing and capable of giving informed consent or with legal agents willing of giving informed consent
- Patients undergoing a transport from the intensive care unit to another institution with the ambulance car
- Patients where the IBP cannula was already placed on the intensive care unit
- Patients where IBP cannula, and CNAP upper arm cuff can be placed on the same arm, and CNAP finger cuff can be placed on the contra-lateral arm
- Intact perfusion of both arm evidenced by a negative Allen's test
- Age 18 years and above
- ASA I-IV
- Weight \>= 40 and \<= 180 kg, BMI \< 35
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with history of neurological, neuromuscular seizure
- Patients where IBP cannula cannot be placed in the radial artery
- Patients with vascular implants at the sites of non-invasive blood pressure measurement (fingers and upper arm)
- Patients with history of arrhythmias
- Edematous patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Robert Hansslead
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel
Kiel, 24105, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Robert Hanss, PD Dr.
UKSH-Campus Kiel
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PD Dr. med.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2011
First Posted
June 25, 2012
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
August 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 25, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-06