NCT01485120

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to establish the performance of a blood pressure cuff. The hypothesis is that the blood pressure reading from the cuff will provide similar blood pressure as a radial artery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2011

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2011

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 5, 2011

Completed
7.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 31, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

May 31, 2019

Status Verified

May 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

December 1, 2011

Results QC Date

August 7, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 6, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Blood pressure (low, normal, high)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Performance Comparison: NIBP Forearm Cuff Using SuperStat Algorithm vs. Invasive Radial Blood Pressure Reading

    NIBP Forearm cuff systolic and diastolic values using SuperStat algorithm compared to invasive radial blood pressure systolic and diastolic values (both obtained simultaneously).

    Approximately 2 hours

  • Performance Comparison: NIBP Forearm Cuff Using Classic Algorithm vs. Invasive Radial Blood Pressure Reading

    NIBP Forearm cuff systolic and diastolic values using Classic algorithm difference compared to invasive radial blood pressure readings (both readings obtained simultaneously).

    Approximately 2 hours

Study Arms (1)

Blood Pressure monitoring

OTHER

Blood Pressure (BP) monitoring using invasive arterial insertion as a standard reference, and an investigational, non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitoring cuff. Data obtained from the cuff used the SuperSTAT NIBP algorithm and the Classic NIBP algorithm for output.

Device: BP monitoring using two methods

Interventions

BP readings from participant using invasive radial arterial line, Non-invasive cuff with SuperSTAT NIBP algorithm, and Non-invasive cuff with Classic NIBP algorithm.

Blood Pressure monitoring

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Ability to provide written informed consent or have a legally authorized representative provide written informed consent
  • Any volunteer subjects ≥ 18 years of age
  • Subject must have the presence of normal sinus rhythm on ECG
  • Subject will return for follow-up visit from 5 days to 8 days after study procedure

You may not qualify if:

  • Any subject who is unable to provide written informed consent
  • Any subject with the presence of peripheral vascular disease in either arm
  • Any subject that demonstrates an initial NIBP screening for a blood pressure distribution range that has already been filled.
  • Any subject who cannot tolerate 21 repeated BP measurements
  • Any subjects with clotting or bleeding disorders
  • Any subjects taking medications that are considered anticoagulants or blood thinners (For example, Clopidogrel, Warfarin, Dipyridamole, Aspirin, and Enoxaparin)
  • Any subject who is unable to have arterial line placed in the radial artery
  • Any subject that cannot tolerate 4 fast flushes for the frequency response
  • Any female subjects pregnant or lactating
  • Any subject that has previously participated in this study
  • Any subjects that cannot return 5 to 8 days post study procedure for a follow-up visit

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clinimark

Louisville, Colorado, 80027, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jeff Conner
Organization
GE Healthcare

Study Officials

  • David Ransom, MD

    Clinimark, LLC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2011

First Posted

December 5, 2011

Study Start

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion

December 1, 2011

Study Completion

December 1, 2011

Last Updated

May 31, 2019

Results First Posted

May 31, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations