Assessing the Patient Experience in Cancer Care
2 other identifiers
observational
408
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Communication is an important component of comprehensive cancer care impacting patient satisfaction, adherence, and quality of life. The wide array of issues addressed in cancer clinical interactions makes communicating about a broad range of topics (including quality of life, communication, symptom control, complementary/alternative therapies, costs, treatment burden, prognosis, anxiety, side-effects, sexual function, palliative care options, etc.) especially interesting and potentially challenging. Some of these topics may not be routinely addressed in the clinical interaction or may require consultative support from other members of the comprehensive cancer care team. One frequently overlooked critical element in research on communication between cancer clinicians, their patients, and their primary care clinicians is describing real-time consultations between patients and their clinicians. These interactions provide rich material for assessing key psycho-social dynamics and identifying issues that patients find important in their care. In order to devise systems of care that optimize the patient experience, it is critical that clinicians and researchers understand, appreciate, and systematically characterize the richness and complexity of the decision-making process in routine cancer consultations between cancer patients and their treating clinicians. This study seeks to assess the patient experience in cancer care by observing patients and their physicians in their clinical interactions and following them for several months to see how their care went. By describing in-depth the conversations and experiences of patients in these clinical interactions, this study will lay the foundation for practice-based interventions to optimize patients' interactions with their cancer care teams.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2012
Typical duration for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedJanuary 20, 2016
January 1, 2016
3.3 years
June 14, 2012
January 18, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Frequency/duration/content of routine cancer consultations surrounding key topics in the clinical dialogue.
Key topics to be studied include: quality of life, complementary and alternative therapies, psycho-social characteristics, patient-clinician dynamics, health literacy
Time of enrollment through completion of 3 month follow-up survey
Eligibility Criteria
Cancer patients age 18 or over receiving care from clinicians who have also consented to participate in this study at Mayo Clinic Rochester, University of Southern California-Norris, or LA County Hospital.
You may qualify if:
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years
- Histological confirmation of: brain, breast, endocrine, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynecological, head/neck, lung, melanoma, or sarcoma malignancies.
- Speak English or Spanish
- Not enrolled in hospice
- In any of the following phases of the cancer control continuum: initial diagnosis, initial treatment, early survivorship, or recurrence.
- Provide written informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
- University of Southern Californiacollaborator
- Johns Hopkins Universitycollaborator
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)collaborator
Study Sites (3)
Los Angeles County Hospital
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
University of Southern California - Norris
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jon C Tilburt, MD, MPH
Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PI
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2012
First Posted
June 18, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 20, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01