Phase III Cat-PAD Study
A Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Multi-Centre Field Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Cat-PAD Peptide Immunotherapy in Cat Allergic Subjects
1 other identifier
interventional
1,408
9 countries
118
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the treatment effect of two treatment regimens of Cat-PAD vs placebo and to evaluates the treatment effect of Cat-PAD on symptoms, rescue medication usage and Quality of Life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
118 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 15, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 14, 2018
CompletedJune 15, 2018
May 1, 2018
3.7 years
May 30, 2012
March 28, 2018
May 16, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Combined Score in Cat-PAD Treatment Groups Compared With Placebo
The primary endpoint was the mean Combined Score (CS) measured over a 3 week period (52-54 weeks after randomisation) in the Cat-PAD treatment groups compared with the mean CS in the placebo group. A higher score indicated worse symptoms or greater use of medication and thus a low score indicated a better outcome. CS = Total Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Score (TRSS) + Rescue Medication Score (RMS). Eight symptoms are defined in the TRSS, 4 nasal symptoms: runny nose, sneezing; blocked nose, and itchy nose and 4 ocular symptoms: itchy eyes; watery eyes; red eyes and sore eyes. Each symptom was rated in severity on a score of 0-3 (0=absent, 3=severe) and the total was divided by the number of symptoms to provide an average score per symptom of 0-3. RMS was scored from 0 (no allergy rescue medication use per day) to 3 (at least one dose of systemic corticosteroid per day). The RMS score was not additive, and therefore the maximum RMS was 3 and the maximum CS was 6.
52-54 weeks after randomisation
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Mean TRSS
52-54 weeks after randomisation
Mean Daily TNSS in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo
52-54 weeks after randomisation
Mean Daily TOSS in Cat-PAD Compared to Placebo
52-54 weeks after randomisation
Mean RMS in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo
52-54 weeks after randomisation
Mean RQLQ Score in Cat-PAD Compared With Placebo
52-54 weeks after randomisation
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Cat-Pad Treatment 1
EXPERIMENTALCat-PAD Treatment 1
Cat-PAD Treatment 2
EXPERIMENTALCat-PAD Treatment regimen 2
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female, aged 12-65 years.
- Moderate to severe rhinoconjunctivitis on exposure to cats for at least 2 years.
- Subjects may optionally also have GINA Step 1 controlled asthma.
- Positive skin prick test to cat hair.
- Cat dander specific IgE ≥0.35 kU/L.
You may not qualify if:
- Asthma falling under the GINA definitions "partly controlled" and "uncontrolled" or Steps 2 to 5.
- FEV1 \<80% of predicted.
- Clinically significant confounding symptoms of allergy to seasonal allergens during the final evaluation period.
- Skin prick test 5 mm greater than the negative control to perennial allergens or animal dander (other than cat) which cannot be avoided during the study.
- Significant symptoms of another clinically relevant illness that is likely to affect scoring of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms.
- Clinically relevant abnormalities detected on physical examination.
- History of severe drug allergy, severe angioedema or anaphylactic reaction to food.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Circassia Limitedlead
- inVentiv Health Clinicalcollaborator
- Pharm-Olam Internationalcollaborator
Study Sites (118)
Unknown Facility
Rolling Hills Estates, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Denver, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Eagle, Idaho, United States
Unknown Facility
Meridian, Idaho, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Evanston, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Forrest, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Normal, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Unknown Facility
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Bangor, Maine, United States
Unknown Facility
Brockton, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Bozeman, Montana, United States
Unknown Facility
Missoula, Montana, United States
Unknown Facility
Bellevue, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Fremont, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Ocean Township, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Unknown Facility
Corning, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Newburgh, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Fargo, North Dakota, United States
Unknown Facility
Minot, North Dakota, United States
Unknown Facility
Canton, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Sylvania, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Toledo, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Lake Oswego, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Medford, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Germantown, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Draper, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Glen Allen, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
South Burlington, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Warrenton, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Spokane, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Greenfield, Wisconsin, United States
Unknown Facility
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Unknown Facility
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Unknown Facility
Brussels, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Ghent, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Leuven, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Corruna, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Kanata, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
London, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Brnho, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Čáslav, Czechia
Unknown Facility
České Budějovice, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Jablonec nad Nisou, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Kutná Hora, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Prague, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Rychnov nad Kněžnou, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Berlin, Germany
Unknown Facility
Bonn, Germany
Unknown Facility
Bramsche, Germany
Unknown Facility
Cologne, Germany
Unknown Facility
Hamburg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Heidelberg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Mönchengladbach, Germany
Unknown Facility
München, Germany
Unknown Facility
Münster, Germany
Unknown Facility
Neuss, Germany
Unknown Facility
Osnabrück, Germany
Unknown Facility
Wesel, Germany
Unknown Facility
Wiesbaden, Germany
Unknown Facility
Wuppertal, Germany
Unknown Facility
Budapest, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Csorna, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Pécs, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Tatabánya, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Bydgoszcz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Gdansk, Poland
Unknown Facility
Katowice, Poland
Unknown Facility
Krakow, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lodz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lublin, Poland
Unknown Facility
Poznan, Poland
Unknown Facility
Rzeszów, Poland
Unknown Facility
Tarnów, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Wroclaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Zabrze, Poland
Unknown Facility
Zawadzkie, Poland
Unknown Facility
Barnaul, Russia
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Novosibirsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Omsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Stavropol, Russia
Unknown Facility
Tomsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Yekaterinburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Bardejov, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Martin, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Poprad, Slovakia
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- VP Clinical Operations
- Organization
- Circassia Ltd
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Harold Nelson, MD
Jewish National Health
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2012
First Posted
June 15, 2012
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
June 15, 2018
Results First Posted
May 14, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05