Design and Validation of a Simulation-based Training Curriculum for Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Laparoscopic bariatric surgery is an advanced laparoscopic procedure with a potential for significant morbidity and mortality along the early part of a surgeon's learning curve. Simulation-based training has been shown to improve a surgeon's technical performance and shorten the learning curves in the operating room. Despite these benefits, there is no evidence-based ex-vivo training curriculum for laparoscopic bariatric surgery. The purpose of this study is to design and validate such a curriculum. This curriculum will include cognitive training, technical laparoscopic skills training (laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy) and non-technical skills training in a simulated environment. The investigators will assess the effectiveness of the proposed curriculum by conducting a randomized single blinded controlled trial. Cognitive knowledge (multiple choice test), technical skills (performance of a procedure in the operating room) and non-technical skills (performance in a simulated crisis scenario in a simulated environment) will be compared between curriculum trained and conventionally trained groups. The investigators hypothesize that curriculum trained group will have superior knowledge, technical skill and non-technical skills compared to conventionally trained group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable obesity
Started Jul 2012
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2013
CompletedNovember 17, 2015
November 1, 2015
11 months
May 30, 2012
November 16, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in operating room performance between curriculum trained and conventionally trained groups
Surgical residents participating in the study will perform a laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy in the operating room. The procedure will be video-recorded through the laparoscopic camera. The videos will be given to a blinded and trained rater who will assess the technical proficiency of the resident using a validated rating scale.
5 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Difference in cognitive knowledge between curriculum trained and conventionally trained groups
5 months
Difference in non-technical skills between curriculum trained and conventionally trained groups
5 months
Study Arms (2)
Curriculum training group
EXPERIMENTALSurgical residents in the curriculum training group will complete the entire curriculum. They will participate in a cognitive component, which will consist of self-directed readings and a faculty-led seminar. Participants will also train to proficiency in laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy and gastrojejunostomy using a laparoscopic box trainer with cadaveric porcine bowels. Finally, for the non-technical skills component participants will participate in an introductory lecture on non-technical skills in surgery, as well as a practice crisis scenario with a debriefing session.
Conventional training group
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in the conventional training group will proceed through surgical residency training in the usual fashion.
Interventions
The training curriculum will consist of a cognitive, technical and non-technical components. Cognitive component will consist of self-directed readings and a faculty-led seminar. Technical component will consist of training to proficiency on cadaveric porcine laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy and gastrojejunostomy models. Non-technical component will consist of an introductory lecture on non-technical skills in surgery and a simulated crisis scenario with a debriefing session.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Resident in general surgery at the University of Toronto
- Post - graduate year (PGY) 3 or 4
- Performed less than 10 laparoscopic bariatric operations independently
You may not qualify if:
- Residents in other surgical programs at University of Toronto
- Residents in general surgery at the University of Toronto in PGY1, 2, 5 or attending surgeons
- Residents who have performed great than 10 laparoscopic bariatric operations independently
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
Related Publications (8)
Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Simulation-based training and learning curves in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Br J Surg. 2012 Jul;99(7):887-95. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8748. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
PMID: 22511220BACKGROUNDRehrig ST, Powers K, Jones DB. Integrating simulation in surgery as a teaching tool and credentialing standard. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Feb;12(2):222-33. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0250-8. Epub 2007 Nov 15.
PMID: 18004630BACKGROUNDAggarwal R, Grantcharov TP, Darzi A. Framework for systematic training and assessment of technical skills. J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Apr;204(4):697-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.016. No abstract available.
PMID: 17382230BACKGROUNDFried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Ghitulescu G, Andrew CG. Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2004 Sep;240(3):518-25; discussion 525-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000136941.46529.56.
PMID: 15319723BACKGROUNDAggarwal R, Boza C, Hance J, Leong J, Lacy A, Darzi A. Skills acquisition for laparoscopic gastric bypass in the training laboratory: an innovative approach. Obes Surg. 2007 Jan;17(1):19-27. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9001-x.
PMID: 17355764BACKGROUNDCatchpole K, Mishra A, Handa A, McCulloch P. Teamwork and error in the operating room: analysis of skills and roles. Ann Surg. 2008 Apr;247(4):699-706. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181642ec8.
PMID: 18362635BACKGROUNDSevdalis N, Davis R, Koutantji M, Undre S, Darzi A, Vincent CA. Reliability of a revised NOTECHS scale for use in surgical teams. Am J Surg. 2008 Aug;196(2):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.070. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
PMID: 18558392BACKGROUNDKorndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Stefanidis D, Touchard CL, Scott DJ. Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jul;201(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.021.
PMID: 15978440BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Teodor P Grantcharov, MD, PhD
Unity Health Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Department of Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2012
First Posted
June 4, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2013
Study Completion
June 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 17, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11