NCT01592409

Brief Summary

Motor vehicle collisions are the leading cause of death for young people. The investigators have recently found that driving after using cannabis is more common among young Canadian drivers than driving after drinking. While this observation raises concerns, the effects of cannabis on driving-related skills in this age group are not well understood. As well, evidence suggests that residual effects of cannabis on driving-related skills may be observed up to 24 hours later. These residual effects may have important implications for the effects of cannabis use on collision risk, but little evidence on them in available. This study will examine the effects of a single dose of cannabis (marijuana) on driving-related skills immediately following consumption, 24 hours later, and 48 hours later. To date, the residual effect at 48 hours has not been examined. A total of 142 subjects aged 19 to 25 years old will be randomly assigned to smoke either a placebo or active cannabis cigarette (12.5% THC potency). Following an eligibility screening and practice session, participants will attend 3 testing days; drug-administration, 24-hour follow-up and 48-hour follow-up. The effects of cannabis/placebo on performance of driving-related skills using a high-fidelity driving simulator will be assessed on each testing day. The effects of cannabis on mood, cognition, memory and complex reaction time will also be assessed. Identifying factors that affect the collision risks experienced by young drivers is a public health priority. While many young people believe that cannabis does not impair driving, some recent studies suggest that these may be very dangerous beliefs. This study will provide important information on how cannabis may affect the driving skills of young drivers, to inform efforts to understand and address cannabis-related collision in this age group.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
99

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2012

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 3, 2012

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 7, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2012

Completed
4.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2016

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 11, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 11, 2019

Status Verified

September 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4.1 years

First QC Date

May 3, 2012

Results QC Date

December 5, 2017

Last Update Submit

September 24, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

cannabis impaired drivingdriving simulationacute psychopharmacologic effects of cannabisresidual effects of cannabisyoung drivers

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Psychomotor Impairment (Driving)

    The driving simulator will objectively measure driving behaviour during a number of pre-programmed driving scenarios. Zone/ Hazard performance measure: Mean Speed.

    Approximate: at baseline (30 minutes before smoking), 30 minutes after smoking

Study Arms (2)

Active cannabis

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In this condition, participants will receive a cigarette containing 12.5% active THC.

Drug: delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

In this condition, participants will receive a cannabis cigarette where the active THC has been removed (contains 0% THC).

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

A single cannabis cigarette (potency 12.5% THC) will be given to participants to smoke over a 10 minute period, ad lib. If the cigarette is not smoked in its entirety, the remainder will be weighed to estimate dose.

Also known as: cannabis sativa, marijuana
Active cannabis

A single placebo cannabis cigarette (0% THC) will be given to participants to smoke over a 10 minute period, ad lib. If the cigarette is not smoked in its entirety, the remainder will be weighed to estimate dose (as this is a double-blind study).

Also known as: cannabis sativa, marijuana
Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years - 25 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Males and females aged 19 to 25
  • Regular cannabis users (between one and four times per week)
  • Held a valid class G or G2 Ontario driver's license (or equivalent from another jurisdiction) for at least 12 months.
  • Willing to abstain from cannabis use for the duration of the study, and for 48 hours prior to Session 2.
  • Provides written and informed consent
  • Urine toxicology result positive for THC (indicating recent use of cannabis).

You may not qualify if:

  • Positive breathalyzer results for alcohol on any given study day.
  • Is a regular user of medications that affect brain function (i.e., antidepressants, benzodiazepines, stimulants).
  • Diagnosis of severe medical or psychiatric conditions.
  • A first degree relative diagnosed with schizophrenia.
  • Meets criteria for current or lifetime Substance Use Disorders (DSM-IV) with the exception of nicotine.
  • Meets criteria for Cannabis Dependence (DSM-IV).
  • Is pregnant, is trying to become pregnant, or is currently breastfeeding.
  • Upon eligibility assessment, toxicology results indicate that the participant has not used cannabis recently.
  • Any toxicology screen after Session 2 - Practice Day indicating a psychoactive substance has been used other than cannabis.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S1, Canada

Location

Related Publications (23)

  • Adlaf EM, Begin P, Sawka E. Canadian Addiction Survey (CAS): A national survey of Canadians' use of alcohol and other drugs: Prevalence of use and related harms: Detailed report. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Cenre for Substance Abuse 2005

    BACKGROUND
  • Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Backman JG, Schulenber JE. Monitoring the future: National results on adolescent drug use. Bethesda, MD.: National Institute on Drug Abuse 2009

    BACKGROUND
  • WHO - Programme on substance abuse. Cannabis: a health perspective and research agenda: World Health Organization 1997.

    BACKGROUND
  • Chipman ML, Macdonald S, Mann RE. Being "at fault" in traffic crashes: does alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, or polydrug abuse make a difference? Inj Prev. 2003 Dec;9(4):343-8. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.4.343.

    PMID: 14693897BACKGROUND
  • Brault M, Dussault C, Bouchard J, Lemire AM. The contribution of alcohol and other drugs among fatally injured drivers in Quebec: final results. Société de l'assurance automobile du Quebec 2002. Available from: http://www.saaq.gouv.qc.ca/publications/dossiers_etudes/drogue_an.pdf

    BACKGROUND
  • Laumon B, Gadegbeku B, Martin JL, Biecheler MB; SAM Group. Cannabis intoxication and fatal road crashes in France: population based case-control study. BMJ. 2005 Dec 10;331(7529):1371. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38648.617986.1F. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

    PMID: 16321993BACKGROUND
  • Siliquini R, Chiado Piat S, Gianino MM, Renga G. Drivers involved in road traffic accidents in Piedmont Region: psychoactive substances consumption. J Prev Med Hyg. 2007 Dec;48(4):123-8.

    PMID: 18557306BACKGROUND
  • Stoduto G, Vingilis E, Kapur BM, Sheu WJ, McLellan BA, Liban CB. Alcohol and drug use among motor vehicle collision victims admitted to a regional trauma unit: demographic, injury, and crash characteristics. Accid Anal Prev. 1993 Aug;25(4):411-20. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(93)90070-d.

    PMID: 8357454BACKGROUND
  • Drummer OH, Gerostamoulos J, Batziris H, Chu M, Caplehorn J, Robertson MD, Swann P. The involvement of drugs in drivers of motor vehicles killed in Australian road traffic crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2004 Mar;36(2):239-48. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00153-7.

    PMID: 14642878BACKGROUND
  • Lacey JH, Kelley-Baker T, Furr-Holden D, Voas RB, Romano E, Ramirez A, et al. 2007 National roadside survey of alcohol and drug use by drivers: Drug results. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 2009.

    BACKGROUND
  • Blows S, Ivers RQ, Connor J, Ameratunga S, Woodward M, Norton R. Marijuana use and car crash injury. Addiction. 2005 May;100(5):605-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01100.x.

    PMID: 15847617BACKGROUND
  • Asbridge M, Poulin C, Donato A. Motor vehicle collision risk and driving under the influence of cannabis: evidence from adolescents in Atlantic Canada. Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Nov;37(6):1025-34. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.05.006. Epub 2005 Jun 29.

    PMID: 15992751BACKGROUND
  • Adlaf EM, Mann RE, Paglia A. Drinking, cannabis use and driving among Ontario students. CMAJ. 2003 Mar 4;168(5):565-6.

    PMID: 12615749BACKGROUND
  • Fischer B, Rodopoulos J, Rehm J, Ivsins A. Toking and driving: Characteristics of Canadian university students who drive after cannabis use - an exploratory pilot study. Drugs Ed Prev Policy 13:179-87, 2006

    BACKGROUND
  • O'Malley PM, Johnston LD. Drugs and driving by American high school seniors, 2001-2006. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Nov;68(6):834-42. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.834.

    PMID: 17960301BACKGROUND
  • McGuire F, Dawe M, Shield KD, Rehm J, Fishcher B. Driving under the influence of cannabis or alcohol in a cohort of high-frequency cannabis users: prevalence and reflections on current interventions. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 53(2): 247-259, 2011

    BACKGROUND
  • Pope HG Jr, Gruber AJ, Yurgelun-Todd D. The residual neuropsychological effects of cannabis: the current status of research. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995 Apr;38(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(95)01097-i.

    PMID: 7648994BACKGROUND
  • Heishman SJ, Huestis MA, Henningfield JE, Cone EJ. Acute and residual effects of marijuana: profiles of plasma THC levels, physiological, subjective, and performance measures. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990 Nov;37(3):561-5. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90028-g.

    PMID: 1965045BACKGROUND
  • Smiley A. Marijuana: On-road and driving simulator studies. Alcohol, Drugs, and Driving. 2:121-34, 1986

    BACKGROUND
  • Crancer A Jr, Dille JM, Delay JC, Wallace JE, Haykin MD. Comparison of the effects of marihuana and alcohol on simulated driving performance. Science. 1969 May 16;164(3881):851-4. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3881.851.

    PMID: 5767792BACKGROUND
  • Cone EJ, Huestis MA. Relating blood concentrations of tetrahydrocannabinol and metabolites to pharmacologic effects and time of marijuana usage. Ther Drug Monit. 1993 Dec;15(6):527-32. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199312000-00013.

    PMID: 8122288BACKGROUND
  • Harder S, Rietbrock S. Concentration-effect relationship of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabiol and prediction of psychotropic effects after smoking marijuana. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Apr;35(4):155-9.

    PMID: 9112136BACKGROUND
  • McLaren J, Swift W, Dillon P, Allsop S. Cannabis potency and contamination: a review of the literature. Addiction. 2008 Jul;103(7):1100-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02230.x. Epub 2008 May 20.

    PMID: 18494838BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psychomotor Disorders

Interventions

Dronabinolnabiximols

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CannabinoidsTerpenesHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Limitations and Caveats

The study examined simulated driving behavior of young regular cannabis users (1 to 4 times per week) and the generalization to new or frequent cannabis users, older drivers, and to real-world driving is unclear.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Robert Mann, Senior Scientist
Organization
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Study Officials

  • Robert Mann, Ph.D.

    Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Bernard Le Foll, M.D., Ph.D.

    Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2012

First Posted

May 7, 2012

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion

August 1, 2016

Study Completion

September 1, 2016

Last Updated

February 11, 2019

Results First Posted

February 11, 2019

Record last verified: 2018-09

Locations