Piperacillin-Tazobactam Continuous Versus Intermittent Infusion for Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
PiperTazo
Efficacy and Safety of Piperacillin-Tazobactam Continuous Infusion vs Intermittent Infusion for Complicated or Nosocomial Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection or Suspected Infection
2 other identifiers
interventional
76
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objective is to verify that the administration of piperacillin / tazobactam administered by continuous infusion to treat complicated infections or with known or suspected nosocomial isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is superior in efficacy to a 30% higher dose administered in conventional short infusion. The secondary objectives were compared between the following variables:
- Microbiological response at 3 days of starting treatment
- Time to microbiological cure
- Clinical response at 3 days of starting treatment
- Time to achieve defervescence
- To examine the relationship between pharmacokinetic variables and parameters of efficacy and safety
- To test the hypothesis that continuous infusion maintains adequate plasma drug levels compared with levels achieved with intermittent administration.
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Occurrence of adverse effects To this end, we designed a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double blind, comparing both forms of administration in patients with complicated or nosocomial infection with or without isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Patients who are candidates for inclusion are classified according to APACHE II and to have or not isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Subsequently be randomized to receive piperacillin-tazobactam by continuous infusion or short. Primary endpoint was measured as the ultimate effectiveness of treatment and other variables such as high efficiency, safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacoeconomic.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started May 2011
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedSeptember 22, 2014
September 1, 2014
2.7 years
May 16, 2011
September 19, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients with satisfactory clinical response (cure or improvement) at the end of Piperacillin-Tazobactam treatment
* Clinical cure: complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of infection * Clinical improvement: resolution or improvement of most signs and symptoms of infection
14 days
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Proportion of patients with clinical response (cure or improvement) at 3 days
3 days
Proportion of patients with microbiological response
3 days
Time to defervescence
14 days
Time to clinical cure
14 days
Mortality
28 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Piperacillin continuous infusion
EXPERIMENTALPiperacillin-Tazobactam 2gr (Loading dose DAY 1) plus Piperacillin-Tazobactam continuous infusion 8gr every 24 hours
Piperacillin intermittent infusion
ACTIVE COMPARATORPiperacillin-Tazobactam 4gr intermittent infusion 4gr every 8 hours
Interventions
Piperacillin-Tazobactam 2gr (Loading dose DAY 1) plus Piperacillin-Tazobactam continuous infusion 8gr every 24 hours (DAY 1-14)
Piperacillin-Tazobactam intermittent infusion 4gr every 8 hours (DAY 1-14)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Complicated or Nosocomial Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection or Suspected Infection
- \> 18 years and \> 40 kg
- Negative pregnancy test for women within fertile period
- Informed consent signature
You may not qualify if:
- Life expectancy \< 72 hr
- Central Nervous System (CNS) infection
- Ventilator-associated pneumonia
- Severe Neutropenia (\<500 cells/ml)
- Acinetobacter baumannii or extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) suspected infection
- Cystic fibrosis
- Shock
- Creatinine clearance \< 20 ml/min
- Dialysis or hemoperfusion
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevillalead
- Ministerio de Sanidad y Política socialcollaborator
- Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocíocollaborator
- Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarenacollaborator
- Hospital Son Espasescollaborator
- Hospital Son Llatzercollaborator
- Complejo Hospitalario de Especialidades Juan Ramón Jimenezcollaborator
- University Hospital Virgen de las Nievescollaborator
- Hospital General de Cataluñacollaborator
- Hospital Infanta Sofiacollaborator
- Hospital Universitario Ntra. Sra. de La Candelariacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
Seville, Seville, 41013, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2011
First Posted
April 13, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion
January 1, 2014
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 22, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-09