NCT01575366

Brief Summary

Aim 1. Determine whether higher-velocity finger tracking training improves hand function more than slower velocity training. Working hypotheses: The higher-velocity training will have significantly greater functional improvement compared to the lower-velocity training, as measured by standardized upper extremity functional tests (Jebsen Taylor test, Box \& Block Test, and Finger extension force test) Aim 2. Ascertain whether higher-velocity finger tracking training differentially induces cortical reorganization as compared to lower-velocity finger tracking training. Working hypotheses: The higher-velocity training will have significantly greater cortical reorganization compared to the lower-velocity training, as measured by:

  1. 1.TMS - increased amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEP) from paretic extensor digitorum muscle in response to paired-pulse TMS to ipsilesional primary motor area (M1).
  2. 2.fMRI - increased volume of activation, signal intensity, and laterality of ipsilesional M1.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
5

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_1 stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2010

Typical duration for phase_1 stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2010

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 19, 2012

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 11, 2012

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

November 1, 2019

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

March 19, 2012

Last Update Submit

October 30, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Hand function improvement

    Jebsen Taylor test, Box \& Block Test, and Finger extension force test

    taken at weekly intervals for the whole study length, 20 weeks.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • corticospinal excitability

    taken at weekly intervals for the whole study length, 20 weeks.

  • cognitive function

    at the beginning and at the end of the study, which are 1st and 20th week.

Study Arms (2)

Slow tracking training

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Tracking training

Fast tracking training

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Tracking training

Interventions

The paretic finger movement training at different velocities included two 5-week periods of five days per week, 2-hours per day phases. The frequency for the higher-velocity training is 0.8 Hz, whereas the lower frequency training is 4 times slower, at 0.2 Hz. The two periods are each followed by a 3-week baseline period. The subject is seated in front of a laptop computer with the paretic forearm resting on the arm of the chair in a quiet room at home. The position of the forearm is pronated. An electrogoniometer, composed of a potentiometer attached to a custom hand splint, is placed on the paretic index finger with the potentiometer centered at the metacarpophalangeal joint. To keep the training session time equal between the two training phases, the duration of each slow training trial is 5 sec, compared to 20 sec for each fast training trial. Ultimately, the total number of required finger extension/flexion training movements is equal between the two phases.

Fast tracking trainingSlow tracking training

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Ischemic stroke - due to higher risk of seizures in hemorrhagic stroke
  • Subcortical location of stroke
  • Stroke after 6 months - lower limit of 6 months to avoid confounding from spontaneous recovery (Jorgensen, Nakayama et al. 1995) and no upper limit to maximize pool of candidate subjects while still showing training effect (Carey, Kimberley et al. 2002)
  • At least 18 years of age - to maximize pool of candidate subjects
  • Mini-Mental State Examination score \>24 - to ensure satisfactory cognition to perform tasks
  • Satisfactory corrected vision - to see computer screen during training and testing
  • Active range of MP joint at paretic index finger of at least 10 degrees - based on minimal movement required to perform training task successfully, and that larger amplitudes would reduce the pool of subjects available for participating in the study.
  • Ability to pronate the forearm so that index finger extension movement during training is vertically upward and relaxation results in the finger falling back to the flexed starting position
  • not currently receiving any other therapy - to avoid confounding treatment effects
  • Approval for participation by a neurologist - to ensure subject is reasonably safe to receive TMS testing. Subjects with proprioceptive loss or expressive aphasia will be included, providing they can carryout the training task.

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to follow 3-step commands
  • A visual field cut that causes subjects not to see all indicators on a computer screen positioned centrally in from of them
  • History of seizures
  • Family member with history of seizures
  • Presence of any other neuromuscular disorders
  • Pregnancy
  • Claustrophobia
  • Indwelling metal or medical devices/implants incompatible with functional fMRI testing
  • History of exposure to finger tracking training.
  • Informed consent will be obtained and TMS/fMRI safety screenings will be conducted prior to testing procedures.
  • Subjects will be recruited as volunteers from letters sent to previous research subjects inviting their participation, through visits to local stroke support groups meetings, newspaper advertisements and referrals from neurologists.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Huiqiong Deng, MD, MS

    University of Minnesota

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2012

First Posted

April 11, 2012

Study Start

February 1, 2010

Primary Completion

August 1, 2012

Study Completion

August 1, 2012

Last Updated

November 1, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-10

Locations