Brain Stimulation-aided Stroke Rehabilitation: Neural Mechanisms of Recovery
2 other identifiers
interventional
67
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether benefits of training the affected hand in patients with stroke can be improved by combining training with a painless, noninvasive technique called Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS). TDCS will be applied over the part of the brain responsible for movements of the affected hand. Also, the investigators will study the changes in the brain that favor recovery of hand function following combination of training and tDCS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 stroke
Started Jul 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_1 stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedJuly 16, 2020
July 1, 2020
8.4 years
February 16, 2012
July 14, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Upper limb function following combination of tDCS with CIMT
To address the functional advantage of combining tDCS and CIMT tests that evaluate impairments of the hand will be utilized. Also, change in ability to carry out activities of daily living will be measured.
Each patient will be given the assessment tests at 3 points during the study, at baseline, interim test (an average of 2.5 weeks from baseline) and at posttest (an average of 5 weeks from baseline).
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Study of change in neural mechanisms that underlie the complementary association of cortical stimulation and CIMT
Each patient will be given the assessment tests at 3 points during the study, at baseline, interim test (an average of 2.5 weeks from baseline) and at posttest (an average of 5 weeks from baseline)
Study Arms (2)
Sham tDCS plus CIMT
SHAM COMPARATORSubjects in this group will be trained on Constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) for the hand while concurrently receiving placebo noninvasive brain stimulation (tDCS). They will be receiving Sham tDCS: placebo noninvasive brain stimulation. They will be provided treatment for 3 days a week for 5 weeks for 1 hr each day at the Cleveland Clinic. They would be asked to use affected hand in daily activities for 5 hrs everyday at home while wearing a mitt on their unaffected hand.
tDCS plus CIMT
EXPERIMENTALPatients with stroke affecting the hand will receive Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) concurrent with tDCS: noninvasive brain stimulation. TDCS will be applied to areas of the brain responsible for movement of the affected hand. This combination of tDCS and CIMT will be delivered for 1 hr each day for 3 days a week for 5 weeks. Patients will also be asked to use their affected hand in daily activities at home for 5 hrs a day while wearing a mitt on the unaffected hand.
Interventions
TDCS is a method of noninvasive stimulation of the brain. Using electrodes placed in saline-soaked sponges, low level of direct current (1mA) is delivered over the scalp. This intervention is considered safe and noninvasive because it does not involve implantation or injection or any skin penetration. In the present study, tDCS will be delivered for 1 hr each day for 3 days a week for 5 weeks in conjunction with constraint-induced movement therapy for the affected hand.
Patients with stroke affecting the hand will receive constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) to re-train movements of the affected hand. Training will involve practicing tasks of daily living with qualified personnel. Training will be delivered for 1 hr each day for 3 days a week for 5 weeks. Patients will also be asked to use their affected hand in daily activities at home for 5 hrs a day while wearing a mitt on the unaffected hand.
Placebo set-up for noninvasive brain stimulation will be similar to that for the active tDCS; sponge electrodes would be placed on the scalp and connected to a batter-operated device. Patients will not receive the effective level of direct current as would delivered in active tDCS intervention. But patients will not be able to decipher whether they are receiving active or placebo tDCS.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with stroke that occurred at least 6 months ago
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant
- Ongoing use of Central Nervous System activating medications
- Presence of an electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated implant, including cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant
- Metal in the head
- A history of medication-resistant epilepsy in the family
- Past history of seizures or unexplained spells of loss of consciousness
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Related Publications (2)
Unger RH, Lowe MJ, Beall EB, Bethoux F, Jones SE, Machado AG, Plow EB, Cunningham DA. Stimulation of the Premotor Cortex Enhances Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity in Association with Upper Limb Motor Recovery in Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Stroke. Brain Connect. 2023 Oct;13(8):453-463. doi: 10.1089/brain.2022.0064. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
PMID: 36772802DERIVEDPlow EB, Cunningham DA, Beall E, Jones S, Wyant A, Bonnett C, Yue GH, Lowe M, Wang XF, Sakaie K, Machado A. Effectiveness and neural mechanisms associated with tDCS delivered to premotor cortex in stroke rehabilitation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Oct 12;14:331. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-331.
PMID: 24119615DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ela B Plow, PhD PT
The Cleveland Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Staff, Neural Control Lab, Dept. of Biomedical Engineering
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2012
First Posted
February 27, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
July 16, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The Investigators will not be sharing or releasing any study data to third parties outside the Cleveland Clinic.