Robotic Brace Incorporating Electromyography (EMG) for Moderate Affected Arm Impairment After Stroke
Robotic Brace Incorporating EMG for Moderate Affected Arm Impairment After Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Stroke is the leading cause of disability in the United States. One of the reasons that it is so disabling is because of upper extremity hemiparesis (weakness in one arm), which is commonly seen after stroke. The objective of this research is to see if a robotic system worn on the weakened arm like a brace is more useful in improving the strength and coordination of the affected arm, and those of other stroke survivors, than therapy only. Muscle weakness and lack of coordination after a stroke have great effects on how severely disabled the arm is and on quality of life after a stroke. In this study, patients may be administered a new robotic brace as part of treatment for their affected arms. If they use this brace, your electromyography (EMG) signals will be used to control the powered arm brace. EMG signals are the small electrical signals that result from the actions of the muscles. The system will "listen" to patients' muscles, using small sensors that sit on top of the skin. The device will give the arm a "power-assist" when patients bend or straighten their elbows. The investigators want to test how easy and effective this system is to use. The investigators hypothesize that people using the robot will be more successful in their rehabilitative efforts - and that their movement will improve more - than people receiving traditional therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1 stroke
Started Sep 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 25, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedMarch 25, 2011
March 1, 2011
1.7 years
March 16, 2011
March 23, 2011
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline to after intervention and 3 months after intervention in the amount of active movement at each joint of the affected arm. This will be measured using the upper extremity section of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment.
The primary outcome in this study is arm impairment. We will measure this using the Fugl-Meyer; a stroke-specific measure that determines how much active movement patients exhibit at each joint of the affected upper extremity.
Twice before intervention; once after intervention; 2 months after intervention.
Study Arms (3)
Myomo + RTP
EXPERIMENTALThis group will be administered a regimen comprised of repetitive task specific practice (RTP) in conjunction with use of the robotic brace described elsewhere in this record.
Myomo
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group will only be administered the robotic brace described elsewhere in this record.
RTP only
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group will be administered repetitive task specific practice (RTP), emphasizing use of their affected arms during performance of valued, functional tasks.
Interventions
Subjects in this group will be administered about an hour/day of therapy targeting the affected arm. This therapy will include about 1/2 an hour of use of a robot that targets arm function and assists with the movement of the affected arm, and about 1/2 an hour of repetitive task specific training (TRP) using the affected arm.
Subjects in this group will be administered about an hour/day of therapy targeting the affected arm. This therapy will include consist of repetitive task specific training (RTP) using the affected arm, in which patients use the arm to relearn valued movements using their arms.
Subjects in this group will be administered about an hour/day of therapy targeting the affected arm. Subjects will use a robot that targets arm function and assists with the movement of the affected arm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Upper extremity Fugl Meyer score \>10-\< 25
- presence of volitionally activated EMG signal from the paretic biceps brachii of at least 5 ųV in amplitude
- stroke experienced \> 1 month prior to study enrollment;
- a score \> 24 on the Folstein Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE)
- age \> 35 \< 85
- have experienced one stroke
- discharged from all forms of physical rehabilitation
- Myomo brace fits on affected arm properly and without discomfort (i.e., no red marks or discomfort observed in 10 minutes of use during fitting).
You may not qualify if:
- \< 35 years old
- excessive pain in the affected hand, arm or shoulder, as measured by a score \> 5 on a 10-point visual analog scale
- excessive spasticity at the affected elbow, as defined as a score of \> 4 on the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale
- currently participating in any experimental rehabilitation or drug studies
- apraxia (\< 2.5 on the Alexander scale)
- severe sensory loss in affected hand (Nottingham sensory scale at least 75% of normal)
- severe language deficits (score \< 2 on NIH Stroke Scale question 9)
- Stroke that occurred in the brainstem
- A current medical history of uncontrolled cardiovascular, or pulmonary disease, or other disease that would preclude involvement in a therapeutic treatment
- History of neurological disorder other than stroke (other neurological disorders may affect the upper extremity motor performance of subjects.)
- Other significant pain or skin irritation in the upper extremity that would be exacerbated if by the use of the brace
- Substantial contracture of elbow, defined as \> 20 degrees of elbow flexion, as measured at the baseline evaluation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Univcersity of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2011
First Posted
March 25, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2012
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
March 25, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-03