NCT01572389

Brief Summary

This clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of the Healthy Outcomes through Patient Empowerment (HOPE) intervention to enhanced usual care (EUC) for diabetes and depression at 6 and 12 month follow-up. The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial enrolling 242 largely rural Veterans with uncontrolled diabetes and clinically-significant depressive symptoms. Both groups will receive screening, education, and notification of clinical findings along with follow-up in usual primary care. HOPE participants will also receive behavioral coaching telephone sessions over a six month period. Patients in the control group will be screened, and providers will be notified of high risk patients' status and need for intervention. Both groups will receive only usual primary care during the subsequent 6 month maintenance period. Study measurements using self-report questionnaires will also be collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months follow-up. The investigators will also conduct chart reviews to evaluate usual care blood tests for diabetes control. Changes in measurements from baseline will be compared between groups. This intervention will reach Veterans in rural setting where community-based primary care is needed, especially care that blends treatment strategies for physical and emotional health.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
225

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2012

Longer than P75 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 7, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 6, 2012

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2012

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 24, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2016

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

November 1, 2017

Status Verified

June 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

March 7, 2012

Results QC Date

June 14, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 14, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Diabetes MellitusDepressionAffective SymptomsSelf CareTelemedicinePsychotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Hemoglobin A1C

    Measures of Hemoglobin A1C will be taken to assess average blood glucose levels throughout the study as an indicator of diabetes control. Hemoglobin A1C is a blood test taken to assess average blood glucose levels in the body. Normal range of A1C level is below 5.7. Eligible participants had an A1C of 7.5 or higher. The higher the A1C the more a person's diabetes is uncontrolled.

    Hemoglobin A1C levels will be measured at baseline, 6-, and 12- months.

  • Change in Patient Health Questionnaires-9 During Intervention

    The Patient Health Questionnaires-9 assesses depressive symptoms during the course of the intervention. The PHQ-9 ranges in score from 0 - 27; where higher numbers represent increase levels of depression. Scores from 5 - 9 represent "minimal symptoms" of depression; 10 - 14 represent "minor depression", dysthymia, or major depression - mild; 15 - 19 represent "major depression, moderately severe"; and scores of 20 and above is considered "major depression, severe." Participants with that scored a 10 or above were eligible for the study.

    PHQ-9 will be assessed at baseline, 6-, and 12- months.

Study Arms (2)

Arm 1: HOPE

EXPERIMENTAL

The Healthy Outcomes through Patient Empowerment (HOPE) intervention group is the intervention arm which will employ behavioral health coaching telephone sessions. Tele-coaching is a theoretically grounded, structured processes guided by intervention manuals.

Behavioral: Healthy Outcomes through Patient Empowerment (HOPE)

Arm 2: EUC

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) group will serve as a concurrent control group to compare to the intervention arm of the study. Participants are screened for diabetes self-management behaviors and control and for active depressive and anxiety symptoms. Primary care providers are alerted of the patients' status and given decision support to enhance care for these uncontrolled conditions.

Behavioral: Enhanced Usual Care

Interventions

HOPE participants will receive 6 behavioral coaching telephone sessions and 3 booster sessions over a six month period followed by usual primary care during the subsequent 6 months maintenance period.

Arm 1: HOPE

All participants receive usual VA primary care plus a dedicated screening for diabetes control and clinically significant depressive symptoms. Patients and primary care providers are notified of these results and given recommendations for usual care.

Arm 2: EUC

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Veterans with comorbid diabetes and depressive symptoms receiving primary care services at VA CBOCs throughout Southeast Texas
  • as well as MEDVAMC patients living \>20 miles from the hospital who face similar distance related treatment barriers
  • Participants must have:
  • a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
  • an average HbA1c level \>7.5% in the prior 6 months
  • clinically significant symptoms of depression
  • Verification of diabetes mellitus diagnoses will be based on data collected from the VA data warehouse.
  • To verify that participants meet the depression criteria, the investigators will use participant self-report of clinically significant depressive symptoms according to the PHQ-9, where a score of greater than/equal to 10 on the PHQ-9 will signify a clinically meaningful symptom burden.

You may not qualify if:

  • The investigators will exclude potential participants only for clinical factors that would render a telephone-based behavioral activation intervention inappropriate.
  • lack of regular access to a telephone
  • significant cognitive impairment (three or more errors) on an established six-item screening exam
  • meeting criteria for bipolar, psychotic, or substance-abuse disorders
  • presence of uncorrected hearing or vision impairment
  • their medical chart recommends not titrating therapy due to prior history of significant hypoglycemic events
  • they live within 20 miles of the MEDVAMC.
  • Patients will be secondarily excluded if their HbA1C level falls below 7.5% at baseline assessment, or if they report suicidal ideation on the PHQ-9 at baseline assessment.
  • Patients receiving mental health services at the time of study recruitment will not be excluded.
  • All mental health treatments and health service-use characteristics will be included in study analyses as covariates.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Martin CE, Renn BN, Winderman KE, Hundt N, Petersen NJ, Naik AD, Cully JA. Classifying diabetes-burden: A factor analysis of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale. J Health Psychol. 2018 May;23(6):882-888. doi: 10.1177/1359105316678667. Epub 2016 Nov 21.

  • Tinetti ME, Naik AD, Dodson JA. Moving From Disease-Centered to Patient Goals-Directed Care for Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Patient Value-Based Care. JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Apr 1;1(1):9-10. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2015.0248. No abstract available.

  • Naik AD, Lawrence B, Kiefer L, Ramos K, Utech A, Masozera N, Rao R, Petersen NJ, Kunik ME, Cully JA. Building a primary care/research partnership: lessons learned from a telehealth intervention for diabetes and depression. Fam Pract. 2015 Apr;32(2):216-23. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu084. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

  • Cully JA, Breland JY, Robertson S, Utech AE, Hundt N, Kunik ME, Petersen NJ, Masozera N, Rao R, Naik AD. Behavioral health coaching for rural veterans with diabetes and depression: a patient randomized effectiveness implementation trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 28;14:191. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-191.

  • Naik AD, White CD, Robertson SM, Armento ME, Lawrence B, Stelljes LA, Cully JA. Behavioral health coaching for rural-living older adults with diabetes and depression: an open pilot of the HOPE Study. BMC Geriatr. 2012 Jul 24;12:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-37.

  • Vaughan EM, Cully JA, Petersen NJ, Hundt NE, Kunik ME, Zeno DD, Naik AD. Testing the Impact of a Collaborative, Goal-Setting, and Behavioral Telehealth Intervention on Diabetes Distress: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Telemed J E Health. 2022 Jan;28(1):84-92. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0533. Epub 2021 Mar 15.

  • Naik AD, Hundt NE, Vaughan EM, Petersen NJ, Zeno D, Kunik ME, Cully JA. Effect of Telephone-Delivered Collaborative Goal Setting and Behavioral Activation vs Enhanced Usual Care for Depression Among Adults With Uncontrolled Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198634. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8634.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes MellitusDepressionAffective Symptoms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Results Point of Contact

Title
Aanand, Naik, MD
Organization
Department of Veteran Affairs

Study Officials

  • Aanand D Naik, MD BA

    Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jeffrey Cully, PhD MEd

    Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2012

First Posted

April 6, 2012

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion

June 24, 2016

Study Completion

September 30, 2016

Last Updated

November 1, 2017

Results First Posted

November 1, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations