Improving Depression Management Through Peer Support
DIAL-UP
1 other identifier
interventional
443
1 country
4
Brief Summary
We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compared the effectiveness of a telephone delivered, recovery focused, peer-support intervention to enhanced usual care for VA patients with depression.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable depression
Started Feb 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable depression
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 18, 2015
CompletedApril 27, 2015
November 1, 2014
3.6 years
October 21, 2008
December 30, 2014
April 6, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change in Functional Status-Mental Health (MCS) Over 12 Month Period
The Veterans Rand 36 Item Health Survey (VR-36) mental health component score (MCS) and physical health component score (PCS) were used as measures of functional status. The MCS and PCS have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating better health.
Change over study period
Change in Functional Status-Physical Health (PCS) Over 12 Month Period
The Veterans Rand 36 Item Health Survey (VR-36) mental health component score (MCS) and physical health component score (PCS) were used as measures of functional status. The MCS and PCS have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating better health.
Change over study period
Quality of Life
The 14-item Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF), which has good reliability and has been used in multiple depression studies, was used to assess quality of life. Responses are scored on a 5-point scale ('not at all or never' to 'frequently or all the time'), where higher scores indicate better enjoyment and satisfaction with life (possible range 14-70).
Change over study period
Depression Symptoms
The 21-item Beck Depression Inventory-2nd Edition (BDI-II) was used to assess depressive symptoms. Total score of 0-13 is considered minimal range, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe.
Change over study period
Recovery Orientation
The 30-item Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM) was used to assess recovery orientation. The MHRM has been fielded among diverse populations and has a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's α =.93) and shows change following engagement in recovery oriented treatments. The MHRM is scored using a 5 point Likert Scale (0 to 4) for each item, yielding a theoretical range from 0 - 120 for Total Score. Higher scores correspond to a higher self-reported level of mental health recovery.
Change over study period
Study Arms (2)
Enhanced Usual Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in the enhanced usual care arm received their usual mental health care, a copy of the Depression Helpbook, and bi-weekly study mailings with depression management tips.
Telephone-based peer support
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the intervention arm received usual mental health care and biweekly study mailings. In addition, they had access to a telephone platform over which they could make free calls to their peer partner for mutual peer support over a 6-month period of time.
Interventions
Patients received a) a peer-support manual that outlines self-management and recovery principles and provides peer discussion topics and b) access to a specialized telephone platform that permits free calls to their partners, ready access to mental health staff for back-up and advice on being effective partners, and recorded tips on depression management. They were asked to call their peer partner at least once a week for 24 weeks.
Patients received their usual mental health care plus a copy of the Depression Helpbook by Wayne Katon and bi-weekly study mailings with depression management tips.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- currently in treatment at Ann Arbor, Detroit, Battle Creek, or Saginaw VA or their associated community based outpatient clinics
- not receiving formal mental health services or regularly attending mutual self-help programs outside of the VA
- diagnosis of a depressive disorder in the last 24 months that is confirmed by the relevant clinician
- being seen less than bi-weekly by clinicians for psychiatric or substance use disorders
- past trial of psychotherapy and/or antidepressant trial
- have a current PHQ-9 scores \> 10 or WSAS scores \> 10
- have stable access to and ability to communicate by telephone
You may not qualify if:
- diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, MDD with psychotic features, or Bipolar I in the past 24 months. Diagnosis of active substance dependence in the past 12 months or substance abuse in the last 6 months
- an immediate risk of suicide, requiring hospitalization or urgent evaluation
- clinician assessment that participation in the study could have an adverse impact on the patient or his/her partner.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105, United States
VA Medical Center, Battle Creek
Battle Creek, Michigan, 49015, United States
John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
Aleda E. Lutz VA Medical Center
Saginaw, Michigan, 48602, United States
Related Publications (2)
Pfeiffer PN, Heisler M, Piette JD, Rogers MA, Valenstein M. Efficacy of peer support interventions for depression: a meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011 Jan-Feb;33(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.10.002. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
PMID: 21353125BACKGROUNDPfeiffer PN, Brandfon S, Garcia E, Duffy S, Ganoczy D, Myra Kim H, Valenstein M. Predictors of suicidal ideation among depressed Veterans and the interpersonal theory of suicide. J Affect Disord. 2014 Jan;152-154:277-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.09.025. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
PMID: 24135507RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
56 of the patients randomized to the telephone-based peer support intervention were excluded from main study analyses because of an unforeseen disruption in their 6-month intervention that was unrelated to patient characteristics.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Marcia Valenstein, MD
- Organization
- Veterans Affairs Healthcare System
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marcia T. Valenstein, MD AB
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2008
First Posted
October 22, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2010
Primary Completion
September 1, 2013
Study Completion
September 1, 2013
Last Updated
April 27, 2015
Results First Posted
March 18, 2015
Record last verified: 2014-11